# Our "security" is so good, nothing fucking works anymore

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 13, 2019, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368 "2019-11-13T16:17:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eva\_Luna](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e495f1/32.png) [@Eva\_Luna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eva_Luna)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/41 "2019-11-17T15:54:58Z")

</div>

> [@Broomstick](#):
>
> This isn’t _entirely_ new - back in the 1990’s when the company I worked at was using the internet more and more the IT department put a porn filter on the web brower/e-mail/etc.
> 
> The problem? My department was _medical research_ doing a project on _ **breast** cancer_. Yep, EVERYTHING blocked. Howls from the researchers. Management meetings.
> 
> The IT department’s answer? “Can’t you use words other than “breast” and “mammary”?”
> 
> Uh, no, not really, not when you’re searching for information on _breast cancer_ in the published literature where literally all the titles and keywords were things like “breast” and “mammary”.
> 
> Eventually something was sorted out so our department, at least, could search on terms like “breast” (and other “naughty” body parts).
> 
> But I suspect it’s only gotten worse.

Years ago, when I was working in-house in a large financial services corporation, I was working on a greed card application for a lovely Chinese woman whose last name was Dong. One day I tried to send an email to outside counsel about her case, and got a sternly worded auto-response that I had violated the company’s profanity policy, and that action would be taken up to and including termination. When I realized what had happened, I called the help desk and told them they had tweaked their filters a bit too hard - it was her name, for chrissakes! They were laughing and told me that there was a Thai women whose name included the letters “porn” who was unable to get any email at all, among other things.

Then, since my function was part of the employment law department, I marched down the hall to my boss’ boss, who was married to a Chinese woman (my immediate boss was on maternity leave, and this issue would have been more his department anyway) and told him what had just happened in case IT contacted him to inform him of my horrible policy violation. We both had a good laugh about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/42 "2019-11-17T16:27:07Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Although I am the only “employee,” and am basically just a science writer, I had to answer questions regarding my policy on disposing of nuclear waste, and on equal opportunity hiring.:dubious:

So, what _is_ your policy on disposing of nuclear waste?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![susan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/susan/32/17537_2.png) [@susan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/susan)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/43 "2019-11-17T17:13:59Z")

</div>

I’ve also been to my post office to fill out a slip of cardstock. They say that there is a glitch and no one can get authorized on line right now. Oh, how we laughed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Folacin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/folacin/32/3195_2.png) [@Folacin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Folacin)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/44 "2019-11-17T18:26:04Z")

</div>

> [@Bayaker](#):
>
> Off I go to the Post Office. The nice lady at the counter gives me a short form, which I fill out while we chat pleasantly about the weather and my upcoming fishing trip. I hand her back the form and go on my way.
> 
> No ID or any “verification” was requested, much less required. Aaargh!

Not that the hoops aren’t ridiculous (if they even worked), but if I’m a hacker looking for laughs, I could presumably fairly easily code up something to randomly put a hold on the mail for an entire city if there aren’t at least some checks on the online form.

Doing it in person would be a tad more difficult.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/45 "2019-11-17T18:38:41Z")

</div>

> [@MEBuckner](#):
>
> So, what _is_ your policy on disposing of nuclear waste?

Put it in dumpster next door and run like hell before anyone sees me.

As much as I might be in favor of diversity in the workplace, unfortunately at the moment my staff consists of a single white male (me).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LurkMeister](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/3da27b/32.png) [@LurkMeister](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LurkMeister)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/46 "2019-11-17T20:02:17Z")

</div>

> [@Bayaker](#):
>
> The same thing happened to me about a week ago. An additional tidbit is that on the registration screen “phone number” is a required field, but below that is a box for “cell(maybe it was mobile) number” which is _not_ a required field. I didn’t fill that out because my cell is turned off most of the time and don’t want the USPS calling it anyway. I got to the Hold Mail screen and was informed about the necessity of my cell number for “verification”, and had to go back and update my profile to include it. Of course then my cell number was unacceptable to them for no given reason. Apart from getting a letter in ten days (I was going out of town in three days) the only other option is that I do it in person at the Post Office. I suppose there has been a problem with evildoers who have someone else’s mail held for shits and giggles while they twirl their mustache, otherwise they wouldn’t require all this crap, right?
> 
> Off I go to the Post Office. The nice lady at the counter gives me a short form, which I fill out while we chat pleasantly about the weather and my upcoming fishing trip. I hand her back the form and go on my way.
> 
> No ID or any “verification” was requested, much less required. Aaargh!

I recently went through the same thing, except that somewhere I found a phone number that allowed me to register the hold request just by going through an automated phone tree. At the end of the call I was given a confirmation number. Just to double-check I then went to the USPS website and called up the hold request to verify it. Good thing I did, because they had the wrong date delivery was supposed to resume. They also had my name (which I had been required to give during the phone call) as something like “baba wawa”. I had also requested that they mail me a registration number, which I got three days later and was able to post to my account before I left.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2019, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/47 "2019-11-18T16:24:13Z")

</div>

I’ve seen plenty of security “successes”.

1. Log-in client A and log-in client B clipping the inputted password to different lengths. Passwords should never be clipped at any length a person is likely to type anyway (because it reduced the number of possible passwords), but at least do it consistently.

2. Password restrictions on the characters typed like: after three lower-case letters you have to have a number or upper-case letter. Which greatly reduces the possible number of passwords.

3. System-wide lock-outs. If a username is tried and fails to log-in after five tries, that user cannot log-in _anywhere_ on the network for 30 minutes. That got fixed quickly when pranksters (it wasn’t me!) repeatedly failed to log in with the CEO’s username, thereby locking the CEO out of everything. Multiple times.

4. Requiring files to be encrypted to each user and with an admin master keyfile, but then encrypting the master keyfile. No one noticed until a user forgot their password and the admin couldn’t reset with the master key, because they needed the unencrypted master key to do it. Analogous to locking yourself out of the car. Fortunately they had also added some Microsoft OS key (which brings up more questions) into the encryption, so after a day or so on the phone with MS support, they were able to get things unlocked.

> [@Hermitian](#):
>
> But doesn’t just about every system lock you out after about 5 tries anyway? So why is brute-forcing even a concern?

Brute forcing is a concern because of this attack: someone gets access to the system and manages to copy the password table to their own system. The passwords should be salted and hashed, so the table doesn’t immediately help the attackers. But, they can then try the most common passwords against each entry in the table at their own leisure. This is why anything that reduces the possible number of passwords is a security flaw.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2019, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/48 "2019-11-18T16:55:55Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> As much as I might be in favor of diversity in the workplace, unfortunately at the moment my staff consists of a single white male (me).

If I were you, I’d report my manager to HR. And unionize to fight against discriminatory hiring practices. And then fire myself for spreading that dangerous union talk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rysto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ecccb3/32.png) [@Rysto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rysto)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2019, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/49 "2019-11-18T18:18:05Z")

</div>

Then sue yourself for labour law violations and you’ll be rich!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2019, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/50 "2019-11-18T19:50:08Z")

</div>

> [@Bayaker](#):
>
> I suppose there has been a problem with evildoers who have someone else’s mail held for shits and giggles while they twirl their mustache, otherwise they wouldn’t require all this crap, right?
> 
> Off I go to the Post Office. The nice lady at the counter gives me a short form, which I fill out while we chat pleasantly about the weather and my upcoming fishing trip. I hand her back the form and go on my way.
> 
> No ID or any “verification” was requested, much less required. Aaargh!

Since you weren’t twirling your mustache in the post office they knew you were okay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alphaboi867](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alphaboi867/32/3898_2.png) [@alphaboi867](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alphaboi867)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2019, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/51 "2019-11-19T00:40:08Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> …On a related note, my phone wasn’t working, and nobody could call me because it didn’t ring, but went straight to voice mail. I IM’ed the helpless desk. Their first question was “what is your call back number?” And they couldn’t accept my cell number because it had to be a company-owned device…

A few months ago I got locked out of all systems at work including my email. The IT “Help” Desk kept insisting they had to send me a password reset email and that it was the only way to reset my password. :smack: They were very insistent that it was impossible to reset it any other way. To be fair he did offer to send it to my personal email; which is blocked on company computers, we have no wifi for ordinary employees, and data service in our building sucks. Eventually I had to escalate 2 management levels to get it resolved. And our parent company is a global technology company to boot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gotpasswords](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c57346/32.png) [@gotpasswords](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gotpasswords)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2019, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/52 "2019-11-20T21:18:46Z")

</div>

> [@Die Capacitrix](#):
>
> And we also had a system with an interesting feature. People would set their password to **password12** and the system would accept it. But when they input the password, it got truncated to **password** before being sent to the system. They could never log in again.

Sounds like there may have been an old mainframe in there somewhere. Until just a couple of years ago, our mainframes running CA Top Secret would cheerfully ignore the ninth and any further characters typed into the password field at login. You couldn’t create a password longer than eight characters, but if your password was **password** you could enter **passwordsarethetoolofthedevilandadda#anda7forthehellofit** and you’d get in. That’s been fixed and users can use anything from 6 to 128 characters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Llama\_Llogophile](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@Llama\_Llogophile](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Llama_Llogophile)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/53 "2019-11-21T19:46:58Z")

</div>

Hey, I’ve got another one.

Got assigned an online course for company training. I’ve used this system before but can’t find my credentials. I get on the site and the only way to recover a password is if you already know your user name. I call them up, they readily acknowledge that I am, in fact me, because I can spell my complex last name, and I know the email and phone number associated with the account.

But… no. They won’t give me my user name, which would enable me to reset my password. Because “security”. I have to contact some damn administrator at my company. We are truly living in Terry Gilliam’s Brazil.

What’s really laughable about this is the training and tests I’m supposed to do are very industry specific and esoteric information. They even give you the answers as part of the course! What am I going to do, hire a 15-year old Asian kid to take it for me like it’s the SAT? This is absurd.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/54 "2019-11-21T19:57:49Z")

</div>

I don’t understand this one. They shouldn’t just give you your username over the phone. And you have to call someone to get it? So what? It’s for your own protection.

Security is not there for your convenience. It’s for your protection. Read some of Mitnick’s books about what he could accomplish simply because people told him stuff over the phone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Llama\_Llogophile](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@Llama\_Llogophile](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Llama_Llogophile)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/55 "2019-11-21T20:10:01Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> I don’t understand this one. They shouldn’t just give you your username over the phone. And you have to call someone to get it? So what? It’s for your own protection.
> 
> Security is not there for your convenience. It’s for your protection. Read some of Mitnick’s books about what he could accomplish simply because people told him stuff over the phone.

As I said in the last paragraph of my post, it’s more because the stakes are so low that I find this ridiculous.

But even so, the information I gave them (on the phone because there was no other method provided) should pretty well establish my identity. Counting the email address, I gave them about 5 factors of authentication. My own protection? Maybe in theory. But in actuality here’s what was accomplished today - they prevented an authentic user from accessing the system legitimately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/56 "2019-11-21T20:14:18Z")

</div>

> [@Llama\_Llogophile](#):
>
> As I said in the last paragraph of my post, it’s more because the stakes are so low that I find this ridiculous.
> 
> But even so, the information I gave them (on the phone because there was no other method provided) should pretty well establish my identity. Counting the email address, I gave them about 5 factors of authentication. My own protection? Maybe in theory. But in actuality here’s what was accomplished today - they prevented an authentic user from accessing the system legitimately.

Sometimes that happens. Perhaps the system also prevented 25 malicious users from accessing the system illegitimately?

I’m curious though, did you give them all your 5 factors of authentication before or after they told you that you had to call someone else to get your username?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Llama\_Llogophile](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@Llama\_Llogophile](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Llama_Llogophile)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/57 "2019-11-21T20:25:17Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> Sometimes that happens. Perhaps the system also prevented 25 malicious users from accessing the system illegitimately?

I seriously doubt that, again because this a very esoteric undertaking with not very much at stake. There would be no reason to hack it. The only thing I can imagine their precautions would guard against would be someone else logging in as me to take the tests for me. But if I were going to do that, I’d just give my credentials to that person. Or, if physically present, log in and let them have at it.

More to the overall point though, when we design security systems that are meant to thwart the .0000whatever percentage of people with nefarious intentions and inconvenience the vast majority of people who aren’t up to no good… well, that’s bad. I grant you, sometimes it’s necessary when the stakes are high. But even then, we see things go awry (hello TSA!) and have good reason to question how we do things.

I see a lot of creep on this, both online and in the physical world and I’m getting a bit fed up. Hence the title of this thread. I’m not up to no good, never have been, never will be and I’m tired of being thwarted from doing what I need to do by security that is poorly designed, overly aggressive and sometimes of questionable necessity in the first place.

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> I’m curious though, did you give them all your 5 factors of authentication before or after they told you that you had to call someone else to get your username?

I spoke with two people and gave them both some information to identify myself. They seemed about to help, then put me on hold, came back and said no.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/58 "2019-11-21T20:47:29Z")

</div>

> [@Llama\_Llogophile](#):
>
> More to the overall point though, when we design security systems that are meant to thwart the .0000whatever percentage of people with nefarious intentions and inconvenience the vast majority of people who aren’t up to no good… well, that’s bad.

Seems to me to only inconvenience those who forget their username, and don’t know the policy on who to call to get it. Clear instructions on what to do to get your username should be on the web site. If they are not, that’s not security’s fault.

> [@](#):
>
> I spoke with two people and gave them both some information to identify myself. They seemed about to help, then put me on hold, came back and said no.

Those two people wasted your time because they didn’t know the policy. Again, not security’s fault.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![squidfood](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a87d85/32.png) [@squidfood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/squidfood)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/59 "2019-11-21T21:16:16Z")

</div>

I did science for a Federal agency. I worked on a campus with several federal buildings. The building next to mine was a different branch of our agency, but we collaborated a lot. Also, this campus was a loong way from Washington DC.

We had a project the required the regular transfer of many many GB back and forth (but a high-speed network was still faster than carrying a hard drive back and forth). Unfortunately, the two agency branches had their own separate IT security divisions headquartered in DC. So the setup meant every byte had to go from our campus to DC, be inspected by one branch’s security outbound, go to the other branch in DC, be inspected inbound, then sent back to the other building on our campus. This was incredibly slow AND kept breaking/timing out. After many many tickets and lots of head-scratching, and many many refusals from national IT to bypass, someone in DC (and I got this in writing) said: there’s no policy we can find against just running a stealth cable between buildings and treating one computer in building A as if it was located in building B. So that’s what we did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2019, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368/60 "2019-11-21T21:19:03Z")

</div>

> [@squidfood](#):
>
> I did science for a Federal agency. I worked on a campus with several federal buildings. The building next to mine was a different branch of our agency, but we collaborated a lot. Also, this campus was a loong way from Washington DC.
> 
> We had a project the required the regular transfer of many many GB back and forth (but a high-speed network was still faster than carrying a hard drive back and forth). Unfortunately, the two agency branches had their own separate IT security divisions headquartered in DC. So the setup meant every byte had to go from our campus to DC, be inspected by one branch’s security outbound, go to the other branch in DC, be inspected inbound, then sent back to the other building on our campus. This was incredibly slow AND kept breaking/timing out. After many many tickets and lots of head-scratching, and many many refusals from national IT to bypass, someone in DC (and I got this in writing) said: there’s no policy we can find against just running a stealth cable between buildings and treating one computer in building A as if it was located in building B. So that’s what we did.

When was this?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/our-security-is-so-good-nothing-fucking-works-anymore/843368.md?page=4)
