# Overrepresentation of "von"s among July 20 conspirators?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 2, 2009, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614 "2009-01-02T18:27:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2009, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/1 "2009-01-02T18:27:48Z")

</div>

After seeing [Valkyrie](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0985699/) the other day, and doing a bit of additional reading on the plot to assassinate Hitler, it seems to me that people whose last names were ‘von-something’ (e.g. von Tresckow, von Boeselager, etc.) may have been overrepresented in the plot. In fact, Stauffenberg himself was also a “von”.

I recognize that the prefix ‘von’ in Germany at that time often did indicate families who were members of the aristocracy, and possibly even true nobility. I recognize further that many members of these families served as officers in the German army. This led to a high number of "von"s, an _excess_ if you will, among German officers in general.

So, given that there was, indeed, an excess of "von"s in the German officer corps, was the presence of so many "von"s among the July 20 conspirators simply a reflection of the high proportion of officers of aristocratic descent or was it truly disproportionately high? Since the erstwhile nobility and aristocracy tended to dislike, and even loathe, Hitler and Nazism, I suspect there is a real excess of "von"s among the plotters. Am I right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Scrivener](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/eada6e/32.png) [@The\_Scrivener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Scrivener)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2009, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/2 "2009-01-02T22:54:39Z")

</div>

I think you’re right on both counts – representative of some true bluebloods, but also out of proportion with the general population (and even that of the armed forces).

FWIW, I’ve read that at least a few Germans tried to dress up their class identity by affecting a “von”; General Friedrich Paulus, commander of the ill-fated 6th Army in Stalingrad, called himself “von Paulus” even though his parentage was bourgois middle class. (He was also said to have been a stickler for being smartly turned out – that is, being very concerned with personal hygiene and the presentability of his uniform.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2009, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/3 "2009-01-02T23:27:48Z")

</div>

In case anyone is interested, here’s Wikipedia’s list of people involved in the plot:

> **[List of members of the 20 July plot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_July_20_plot)**
>
> On 20 July 1944, Adolf Hitler and his top military associates entered the briefing hut of the Wolf's Lair military headquarters, a series of concrete bunkers and shelters located deep in the forest of East Prussia, not far from the location of the World War I Battle of Tannenberg. Soon after, an explosion killed three officers and a stenographer, injuring everyone else in the room. This assassination attempt was the work of Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, an aristocrat who had been severely w...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2009, 3:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/4 "2009-01-03T03:13:05Z")

</div>

Keep in mind that the conspirators were a self-selected group. They were most likely to trust and recruit officers who came from the same background as they did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2009, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/5 "2009-01-03T16:14:41Z")

</div>

Thanks for all your answers.

What **Little Nemo** said, in particular, makes a lot of sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2009, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/6 "2009-01-03T16:56:49Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> What Little Nemo said, in particular, makes a lot of sense.

If this board ever needs a new motto…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 12:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/7 "2009-01-04T00:35:32Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Scrivener](#):
>
> I think you’re right on both counts – representative of some true bluebloods, but also out of proportion with the general population (and even that of the armed forces).
> 
> FWIW, I’ve read that at least a few Germans tried to dress up their class identity by affecting a “von”; General Friedrich Paulus, commander of the ill-fated 6th Army in Stalingrad, called himself “von Paulus” even though his parentage was bourgois middle class. (He was also said to have been a stickler for being smartly turned out – that is, being very concerned with personal hygiene and the presentability of his uniform.)

Nazi diplomat Joachim von Ribbentrop was another self-styled aristocrat; I believe he was really just Joachim Ribbentrop. It seems to me that the National Socialists in general continued to regard the aristocracy in somewhat better esteem than vice versa, and they did share some common ground, such as being anti-leftist. This would have been more the case after the more populist, “socialist” wing of the party was eliminated in The Night Of Long Knives in 1934.

One should keep in mind that, in the German system of nobility, lower level aristos might have the “von” prefix but would be on par with mere squires or other representatives of the gentry in Great Britain, where the gentry is not usually considered part of the nobility. I point this out lest anyone think that all these “vons” are counts or barons with castles and huge tracts of land and so forth. Also there are a few noble German families, very old and noble, who do not use the “von”, and again, a few other non-noble families who have the “von”, much like “van” in The Netherlands.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kellner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/c2a13f/32.png) [@kellner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kellner)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 3:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/8 "2009-01-04T03:45:26Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> Nazi diplomat Joachim von Ribbentrop was another self-styled aristocrat; I believe he was really just Joachim Ribbentrop.

He was born as the commoner Joachim Ribbentrop. As an adult he was adopted by a noble relative. This did not make him a nobleman but he was legally a _von_ Ribbentrop. Although he probably enjoyed the confusion, I can’t believe that he actually claimed nobility. That would have been a pretty serious issue and an officer of the time would have been expected to put a bullet through his head for less than that.

> [@](#):
>
> One should keep in mind that, in the German system of nobility, lower level aristos might have the “von” prefix but would be on par with mere squires or other representatives of the gentry in Great Britain, where the gentry is not usually considered part of the nobility. I point this out lest anyone think that all these “vons” are counts or barons with castles and huge tracts of land and so forth.

That’s an important point. Most of those families were essentially farmers. They might have been the most important landowners in their respective villages but for most that meant neither fabulous wealth nor the cushy court life that people often imagine – especially not for younger sons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kellner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/c2a13f/32.png) [@kellner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kellner)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 3:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/9 "2009-01-04T03:54:22Z")

</div>

> [@kellner](#):
>
> […] and an officer of the time would have been expected to put a bullet through his head for less than that.

Well, technically Ribbentrop was a retired officer but of course he wasn’t exactly famous for that. Sorry, somehow I was still in “aristocratic officer” mode.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 6:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/10 "2009-01-04T06:33:47Z")

</div>

> [@kellner](#):
>
> He was born as the commoner Joachim Ribbentrop. As an adult he was adopted by a noble relative. This did not make him a nobleman but he was legally a _von_ Ribbentrop. .

I didn’t know about the adoption. Was the relative’s name von Ribbentrop or von “something else”? If it was ‘von R.’, then does it/did it frequently happen that there would be common and noble branches of the same family, using the same name with or without the ‘von’ depending?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 7:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/11 "2009-01-04T07:43:19Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> I didn’t know about the adoption. Was the relative’s name von Ribbentrop or von “something else”?

The relative’s father (Karl Ribbentrop) had been knighted in 1884, so his daugter Gertrude had the surname von Ribbentrop. Gertrude was the one who adopted the famous Nazi, in return for his promise to pay her a pension (which he then broke).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Scrivener](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/eada6e/32.png) [@The\_Scrivener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Scrivener)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/12 "2009-01-04T13:25:02Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Amazing](#):
>
> The relative’s father (Karl Ribbentrop) had been knighted in 1884, so his daugter Gertrude had the surname von Ribbentrop. Gertrude was the one who adopted the famous Nazi, in return for his promise to pay her a pension (which he then broke).

[snorts] Figures… first the Molotov - von Ribbentrop Pact, then his word to his aunt [or whatever she was in relation to him]… 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/13 "2009-01-04T16:36:23Z")

</div>

> [@kellner](#):
>
> Most of those families were essentially farmers. They might have been the most important landowners in their respective villages

I suppose there’s a pretty close parallel here to the fictional Bennetts in _Pride And Prejudice_. They and their type are often described in fiction of the period as “the principal inhabitants” of whatever village. But they certainly don’t come off as stereotypical nobles (aside from the fact that they aren’t in the UK system).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2009, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/14 "2009-01-04T16:42:51Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Amazing](#):
>
> The relative’s father (Karl Ribbentrop) had been knighted in 1884, so his daughter Gertrude had the surname von Ribbentrop. Gertrude was the one who adopted the famous Nazi, in return for his promise to pay her a pension (which he then broke).

Did being knighted entitle the honoree and his family to start calling themselves ‘von’? I recall that the French had a similar system, from reading that the Montgolfier brothers, for their achievement, were ennobled and this gave them the right to call themselves ‘de Montgolfier’ instead of just ‘Montgolfier’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2009, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/15 "2009-01-15T16:38:35Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> …huge tracts of land…

Python reference duly noted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2009, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/16 "2009-01-15T17:06:42Z")

</div>

> [@KarlGauss](#):
>
> Since the erstwhile nobility and aristocracy tended to dislike, and even loathe, Hitler and Nazism, I suspect there is a real excess of "von"s among the plotters. Am I right?

It was mutual. One of the main reasons Hitler showed preference to the Waffen SS over the regular Germany army. The aristicracy were firmly entrenched in the military. From long before Hitler. They didn’t like him. They looked down on him as just an Austrian Corporal. Hitler knew this and hated them right back. He saw the plot as a way to clean house. BTW the person that Cruise plays in the movie was not just a “von”, he was a Graf.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2009, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/17 "2009-01-15T17:07:08Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> Did being knighted entitle the honoree and his family to start calling themselves ‘von’?

It did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Scrivener](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/eada6e/32.png) [@The\_Scrivener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Scrivener)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2009, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/overrepresentation-of-von-s-among-july-20-conspirators/479614/18 "2009-01-15T20:07:23Z")

</div>

> [@Loach](#):
>
> It was mutual. One of the main reasons Hitler showed preference to the Waffen SS over the regular Germany army. The aristicracy were firmly entrenched in the military. From long before Hitler. They didn’t like him. They looked down on him as just an Austrian Corporal. Hitler knew this and hated them right back. He saw the plot as a way to clean house. BTW the person that Cruise plays in the movie was not just a “von”, he was a Graf.

Not only was he a “von” and a “Graf,” he was also a “Schenk”… [Claus Philipp Maria Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_von_Stauffenberg) [whew!]. Here’s the Wiki on the [German nobility titles system](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nobility), which was officially disbanded in 1919 under the Weimar govt., so the titles were no longer reigning, even if the nobles still enjoyed trotting them out for social/class reasons. Note that just as in other languages, the titles themselves became popular surnames (Kaiser, Koenig, Kurfurst, Prinz, Herzog, Furst, Pfalzgraf, Schenk, Graf, Ritter, etc.).
