# Owners of fansites.

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/owners-of-fansites/145800
**Category:** The BBQ Pit
**Created:** [December 31, 2002, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/owners-of-fansites/145800 "2002-12-31T01:48:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lobsang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobsang/32/4067_2.png) [@Lobsang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobsang)
#### Post date: [December 31, 2002, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/owners-of-fansites/145800/1 "2002-12-31T01:48:47Z")

</div>

**Would it hurt you to carry pictures I don’t need a magnifying glass to see?**  
A lot of people are on broadband connections now, and even those who are not are prepared to wait all of 1 minute for a decent sized picture to download.

And don’t say it’s because of how much webspace you’ve got. I have got 5MB on mine (relativelt feeble amount) and I worked out that I can fit about 50 1280x1024 pictures in there (with thumbnails)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Troy\_McClure\_SF](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troy_mcclure_sf/32/4150_2.png) [@Troy\_McClure\_SF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Troy_McClure_SF)
#### Post date: [December 31, 2002, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/owners-of-fansites/145800/2 "2002-12-31T02:03:46Z")

</div>

One thing I like is how, when people try to create a thumbnail listing, simply adjust the size of the picture on the thumbnail page. So you have a pageful of 2 MB jpegs that are each 80 x 100 pixels, that takes some time to load and render, even on broadband.

“But when you click the thumbnail, the full-sized picture loads faster!” :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lobsang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobsang/32/4067_2.png) [@Lobsang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobsang)
#### Post date: [December 31, 2002, 4:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/owners-of-fansites/145800/3 "2002-12-31T04:14:05Z")

</div>

My page (recently updated, in the sig - or click www if you have sigs turned off) is a shining example of how a webpage should be!

Well maybe not, but at leas there’s no popups. And the pictures are a decent size, and the thumbnails are not just a resized link to the large picture (the thumbnails average at 10k each, main pictures 200k)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Brutus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/91b2a8/32.png) [@Brutus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Brutus)
#### Post date: [December 31, 2002, 4:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/owners-of-fansites/145800/4 "2002-12-31T04:35:56Z")

</div>

You really should put more scantily-clad women on your website.

Like any good man from the Balkans, I appreciate the picture of the 2 fine sheep (or are they some sort of wooly he-cows?), but why not some pictures of the women of Isle of Man?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lobsang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobsang/32/4067_2.png) [@Lobsang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobsang)
#### Post date: [December 31, 2002, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/owners-of-fansites/145800/5 "2002-12-31T04:40:09Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> You really should put more scantily-clad women on your website.

My dad has the link.

And I don’t have the guts to take pictures of the women of the Isle of Man. (believe me - I would rather my site was ‘sexy women I’ve taken pictures of’, but that aint going to happen soon)
