There’s a name for that, but I forget what it is at the moment. At any rate, I’m sure it’s a far more intellectually honest method of debate than you’ll find from them danged self-indulgent Yur-peens.
*[sub]You’re right, 'possum stalker; it IS possible to choke on your own sarcasm…[/sub]
You know, that kind of rings a bell. Something about demonstrating dishonest debate tactics as an object lesson, as an example to lesser minds on improper conduct.
Oh, the perfidious French! Had it not been for thier chicanery and diplomatic skullduggery, the entire world would have joined in a unanimous chorus of glad approval for the US. They would have been clamoring to shower us with troops and money, seeing clearly to utter moral rectitude of our cause. But for the French.
Were it not for thier invention of oral sex, I would be hard pressed to forgive them.
I’m sure that all of Yurp weeps for the loss of your support, dishonest debating tactics and all – isn’t there a word for that? Just one last question – if France was providing arms to support Mr. secular socialist alternative to the Mullahs Saddam Hussein, weren’t they aiding in the great struggle against Shari’ a Laws?
PS: Are you sure you don’t want to borrow my internet tag with the word ‘Cognitive’ thrown in front of it?
I hear the French have no rights, and they spit on pictures of Ayn Rand. Also, they eat brie n’ infants!
Not really! Tee-hee. No facts. Debate technique. I win again. Time to take my ball and go home.
Yes, it’s hypocrisy season alright.
Before this thread dries out and blows away like the goat turd it is, I’d like to take a special moment to recognize sterling efforts by jjimm,elucidator, and dissonance in the fight against the forces of asininity. Huzzah!