Parking lots lined using green paint

Hmmm… It seems this has everybody mystified. :smiley:

It is possible, I suppose, that they were aiming for higher visibility. If they were, it is my opinion that they missed badly. The lines are not a lime green at all - the shade of green is actually pretty dark. On black tarmac, I think they’re far less visible than white.

So much less visible that it had crossed my mind that it was an attempt to be (for some reason) more subtle with the striping, in a stereotypical “weird tree-huggin’ California way.” From a distance, new parking lots now look like unlined expanses of black tarmac. What doesn’t make sense about my theory is that I can’t see why this would be in any way more “natural” than a brightly lined lot. However, decisions made on wacky grounds are not unheard of around here, so I’m not ready to rule that out just yet.

I did another web search, and I came up with ONE hit which makes an oblique reference to the green being a requirement. This newsletter of the Newport Harbor Nautical Museum (which is in Newport Beach, CA) states:

Now, I am a bit confused, as the Irvine Company is more deeply involved with city planning in Irvine than in adjacent Newport Beach, but the exact nature of the relationship and just what it encompasses is unclear to me.

I suppose it could be that the Irvine Company owns all of those “greened” parking lots, and has decided (for whatever reason) that all lots on its property are to become green-striped. I did a bit of poking on their website, and came up with this tidbit which makes that sound likely:

So they probably do own all of that land, and thus make the rules (so to speak).

If that’s the explanation, then the question of why green stripes would be preferred is still open. :confused: