# Passports to be required to enter US from Canada, Mexico, elsewhere

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 5, 2005, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858 "2005-04-05T16:27:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 19\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e19adc/32.png) [@Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2005, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/41 "2005-04-06T20:10:43Z")

</div>

> [@Chad C. Mulligan](#):
>
> From the context, I assume you meant “tourism”. 😃
> 
> Made me do a double-take, I tell you what.

Canada: we’re really fucking mean to American tourists 😃 That is one mighty typo of mine, and I’m glad I didn’t do that at work.

As for the simplicity of getting your first American passport compared to Canada, I agree that it will not deter anyone planning a trip across the border, or to anyone who regularly crosses the border for economic reasons: it will detract from the initial, impulsive trips that many people make. I could ask around the office and easily find dozens of people who made their first trip to Canada as an impulsive weekend roadtrip while in college. _That_ kind of trip will disappear for a number of years, until the U.S. and Canada reach the stage where everyone has a passport.

It’s just sad that this is the complete opposite direction that Europe is taking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2005, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/42 "2005-04-06T21:01:50Z")

</div>

I’m still unclear what this is supposed to accomplish. Did we almost get taken over by Canada or something? Because… someone would have let me know, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2005, 9:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/43 "2005-04-06T21:06:47Z")

</div>

For those actually paying attention, from the link in post #35:

> [@](#):
>
> The Department of Homeland Security says that some means of identification besides passports might be accepted. Special passes now issued to people who cross the Mexican border frequently will probably continue to be valid, the agency said.
> 
> U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, who co-authored the intelligence reform law, said she included a provision to ensure that the interests of border community residents are taken into account in new rules, including developing special programs for those who cross the border frequently.

And from the first link (Dept. of State) in UncleBeer’s post (my bolding):

> [@](#):
>
> The Departments of State and Homeland Security announced today the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative to secure and expedite travel. The Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative will require all U.S. citizens, Canadians, citizens of the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda, and citizens of Mexico to have a passport **or other accepted secure document** to enter or re-enter the U.S. by January 1, 2008.
> 
> \<snip\>
> 
> As previously noted, the passport (U.S. or Foreign) will be the document of choice for entry or re-entry into the U.S. However, another document that we anticipate will be acceptable under the travel initiative is the Border Crossing Card, (BCC – or “laser visa”). Currently, the BCC serves in lieu of a passport and a visa for citizens of Mexico traveling to the U.S. from contiguous territory. Other documents that we anticipate will be acceptable under this Initiative are the Customs and Border Protection Secure Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid Inspection (SENTRI), NEXUS and Free and Secure Trade (FAST) program cards.

I’m not familiar with the hassle factor of getting one of these other documents, but it seems that it is incorrect to jump to the conclusion that a passport will be required in all instances, and that State is simply ignoring the needs of border residents.

For the record, though, I doubt this action will make us any more secure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reeder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c6cbf5/32.png) [@Reeder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reeder)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2005, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/44 "2005-04-06T22:14:05Z")

</div>

Won’t people please think of the poor citizens of Point Roberts Wa.?? Their only road out of town goes into Canada.  
What a hassle that will be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gangster\_Octopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a8b319/32.png) [@Gangster\_Octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gangster_Octopus)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2005, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/45 "2005-04-06T22:56:06Z")

</div>

What percentage of Americans and Canadians have passports? My firends in Europe tell me one of the first things they do for thier newborns is get them a passport.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2005, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/46 "2005-04-06T23:21:58Z")

</div>

It just doesn’t seem that big a deal to me. If you live near the border and think you’ll want to casually go back and forth, then get a passport. It’s not that much of an expense if border-crossing figures frequently in your lifestyle. And for Americans, the passport lasts for 10 years.

If you don’t live near the border but find yourself headed to Canada or Mexico for a vacation, then having to get a passport is a minor inconvenience at most. Even before we heard of these new proposals, I’d read that a passport was not necessary but strongly recommended for going to Canada, or into Mexico beyond the border zone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2005, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/47 "2005-04-06T23:23:26Z")

</div>

> [@Gangster Octopus](#):
>
> What percentage of Americans and Canadians have passports? My firends in Europe tell me one of the first things they do for thier newborns is get them a passport.

Probably not many. I think I heard someone on the radio say 35% yesterday, but that sounds awfully high. The plain truth is that the vast majority of Americans never go overseas, and until now have never needed passports for visiting Canada or Mexico.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![detop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/bcef8e/32.png) [@detop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/detop)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 6:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/48 "2005-04-07T06:15:31Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> It doesn’t even need to be tit-for-tat. I was reading an article about this in the paper today which stated that Canada and Mexico would look at requiring US citizens to show passports to enter their respective countries for the simple reason that they don’t want a bunch of Yanks stranded at the border when they try to return to the US.

Actually we should take the high road and not demand passports to enter Canada. So when all the absent-minded Americans are stuck on our side of the border, we would make a killing feeding them, providing them with accomodations, etc… while they sort out their situation 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rfgdxm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c0e974/32.png) [@rfgdxm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rfgdxm)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 12:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/49 "2005-04-07T12:52:38Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre of Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> Probably not many. I think I heard someone on the radio say 35% yesterday, but that sounds awfully high. The plain truth is that the vast majority of Americans never go overseas, and until now have never needed passports for visiting Canada or Mexico.

And distances between foreign countries in Europe is small, and they can be driven to. I live in Michigan. At the moment, I’d have to drive to Central America before I got to a country I needed a passport to enter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/50 "2005-04-07T13:28:19Z")

</div>

**John, Unc** , if you don’t even know what these alternative procedures even _are_, much less that they’ll be implemented instead, you’re not in a good position to claim the situation won’t really be that bad, now are you? Believe it or not, you righties are not required to back each other all the way, no matter what, ya know - unless that’s part of the secret blood oath of loyalty you don’t talk about. If this law/proposal/whateveryoulike isn’t defensible, you look foolish trying to defend it anyway.

> [@Unc](#):
>
> I can see why you may have reached that conclusion

Then knock off the silly abuse attempts and try to make your points more clearly in the future. If \*that \* problem is a symptom of muddled thinking on your part, don’t blame anybody else for it.

**detop** , be careful what you wish for - there’s a lot more Yanks than Canucks, the visitors might like it in Canada and stay, then they’d start agitating about taxation without representation, and you know where \*that \* leads.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/51 "2005-04-07T14:27:42Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre of Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> It just doesn’t seem that big a deal to me.

Hey, if it is no big deal, then why implement the plan?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/52 "2005-04-07T15:55:19Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> **John, Unc** , if you don’t even know what these alternative procedures even _are_, much less that they’ll be implemented instead, you’re not in a good position to claim the situation won’t really be that bad, now are you?

Except that I never said “the situation won’t really be that bad”. You did. Given that you were in error saying that a passport would be required, it is encumbent on YOU to demonstrate that these other means of identification are “that bad”. But the fact is, we really don’t know what the final policy will be, so none of us really is in a position to say. Maybe the “other means of identification” will turn out to be a ruse, and they won’t help any. Maybe a workable accomodation will be made for those liviing in border communities. Right now, we really don’t know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/53 "2005-04-07T17:44:08Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> it is encumbent on YOU to demonstrate that these other means of identification are “that bad”.

Snort. No one else has any obligation to supply the underpinnings for your own speculation.

The “proposal” as it stands does require passports. There “may” be alternative methods made available, or there may not. They still _would_ be burdens on travelers that do not at present exist. That should be clear to you. There will likely be no benefit in terms of actual security, either - no one in this thread has agreed with Bush’s assertion that there will.

So we have definable negative consequences for the US and its neighbors, although the precise extent is discussable (and much less rudely than you’ve done so thus far). There are no definable positive benefits that anyone here accepts as real. Your reasons for not joining in the deploring of this move are, then, subject to others’ speculation, are they not? Care to elaborate for us instead?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UncleBeer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/977dab/32.png) [@UncleBeer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UncleBeer)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/54 "2005-04-07T17:50:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> John, Unc, if you don’t even know what these alternative procedures even are, much less that they’ll be implemented instead, you’re not in a good position to claim the situation won’t really be that bad, now are you?

Elvis, if the regulations currently publicized are only _proposed_, you’re not in a good position to claim the situation will be so terrible, now are you?

Sheesh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BwanaBob](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bwanabob/32/2985_2.png) [@BwanaBob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BwanaBob)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/55 "2005-04-07T18:06:31Z")

</div>

I have to laugh at all you people pissing and moaning about getting a passport.

You probably blow more than $100 on night out on the town - so skip one night out and get yourself a passport.

You know you can actually use it to visit Europe and Asia too? :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gaudere](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e495f1/32.png) [@Gaudere](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gaudere)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/56 "2005-04-07T18:24:58Z")

</div>

Part of the hassle of getting a passport is the wait–about six weeks for regular or you can pay $60 more and get expedited service of two weeks if it’s an emergency. I cen definitely see it cutting down on any trips people don’t plan two months in advance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/57 "2005-04-07T19:28:33Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> Snort. No one else has any obligation to supply the underpinnings for your own speculation.

Snort? I guess you really ARE funny.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 7:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/58 "2005-04-07T19:43:00Z")

</div>

> [@Unc](#):
>
> Elvis, if the regulations currently publicized are only proposed, you’re not in a good position to claim the situation will be so terrible, now are you?

Consider the possibilities and outcomes:

1. It happens as advertised, and therefore will be as bad as the Dopers think. No benefits, significant costs.
2. It won’t happen at all, and we’ll stay as insecure as the Bushies claim (no, strike that from the list of possibilities, they won’t/can’t back down).
3. Something in between, as yet undefined (but still clear enough to you and **John** to get you up on your hind legs and demand that others provide evidence against), still useless but still with costs that are even less defined than with the passport proposal. Still requires Bush to back down, notice.

**John** , the insistence that this prospective middle ground is not only possible but likely, as well as acceptable, _is_ the product of your own imagination. Provide your own evidence or think harder before posting about it, m’kay? Hell, even before the evidence, provide your own _definition_ if you want any real discussion.

Now, how can anyone with a claimed libertarian orientation, or even a more-inchoate but more-common “get government off our backs” orientation, or even anyone versed in cost-benefit analysis, not oppose this? Is there another possibility than reflexive partisanship?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eva\_Luna](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e495f1/32.png) [@Eva\_Luna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eva_Luna)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2005, 2:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858/59 "2005-04-08T02:16:13Z")

</div>

> [@Gaudere](#):
>
> Part of the hassle of getting a passport is the wait–about six weeks for regular or you can pay $60 more and get expedited service of two weeks if it’s an emergency. I cen definitely see it cutting down on any trips people don’t plan two months in advance.

I think that estimate is padded; I got mine renewed a couple of years ago, and it took less than 3 weeks door to door. The initial application, way back when (sheesh, is it really 16 years ago already?) took 2 weeks door to door. Of course, it probably takes longer in spring and summer, when everyone is planning vacations. How many people really take their first trip outside the U.S. on less than 3 weeks’ notice?

Of course, I really doubt that requiring passports for international travel is going to deter much of anybody from much of anything.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/passports-to-be-required-to-enter-us-from-canada-mexico-elsewhere/297858.md?page=2)
