# Paying to be annoyed
**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [June 17, 2006, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014 "2006-06-17T00:53:33Z")
**Posts on this page:** 18
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)
#### Post date: [June 17, 2006, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/1 "2006-06-17T00:53:33Z")
I’ve received a couple of recorded marketing calls on my mobile phone since I changed my number. I thought it was illegal to make such calls, so I dropped a line to Cingular. This is what they said:
> [@](#):
>
> Due to recent changes in Federal Telemarketing Regulations, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was required to release wireless numbers to open marketing. Unfortunately, this applies to all wireless carriers and customers…
And…
> [@](#):
>
> Any incoming or outgoing calls that utilize airtime will use airtime. If you answer a call and it is a marketing call, you are using airtime, and will be charged for it. If you go over the minutes in your package, you will be charged overages. If you are close to your limit every month, the only thing you can do is go to a higher package if you are concerned about going over the minutes. Cingular does not credit for marketing calls. If you receive marketing calls after adding your number to the do
> not call registry, then you are legally able to go after the company that is marketing to you unsolicited. Beyond that, the only option you have if you do not wish to use airtime would be to not answer the incoming phone call if you are unsure of the caller’s identity.
So whose bright idea was it to change the rules so that people will (potentially) pay to be annoyed by telemarketers on their wireless phones? When did the rules change?
---
### Author:  [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)
#### Post date: [June 17, 2006, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/2 "2006-06-17T00:57:56Z")
And who do we shoot for changing them?
---
### Author:  [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)
#### Post date: [June 17, 2006, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/3 "2006-06-17T01:00:09Z")
Oh – If I get a call after my numbers are on the do-not-call list, how would I go about making a complaint? Do I get any money from the telemarketing company? Or does the fine go to the FCC?
---
### Author:  [@diggleblop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/diggleblop)
#### Post date: [June 17, 2006, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/4 "2006-06-17T20:34:45Z")
Just go to the File a Complaint link on that site. I’ve done it many times. THey never called back either. The Direct Marketing Association in D.C. has an updated list of the Do-Not-Call numbers on their desk daily.
---
### Author:  [@Number](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Number)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/5 "2006-06-18T00:19:22Z")
Er, really? I thought the plan to open up cell phones to telemarketing was an urban legend. [Snopes](http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/cell411.asp) says so, as does the [linked page](http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/04/dnc.htm) from the Federal Trade Commission.
> [@](#):
>
> FCC regulations prohibit telemarketers from using automated dialers to call cell phone numbers. Automated dialers are standard in the industry, so most telemarketers are barred from calling consumers on their cell phones without their consent.
Did the Cingular rep provide any cites for the regulation changes?
---
### Author:  [@Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_T-Bonham.net)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/6 "2006-06-18T00:34:50Z")
> [@Johnny L.A.](#):
>
> So whose bright idea was it to change the rules so that people will (potentially) pay to be annoyed by telemarketers on their wireless phones?
George Bush’s appointees on the FCC changed the rules. It was probably the ‘bright idea’ of the tele-marketing companies.
Additional comments on this should probably go into the pit, rather than GQ.
---
### Author:  [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/7 "2006-06-18T00:44:20Z")
> [@t-bonham@scc.net](#):
>
> George Bush’s appointees on the FCC changed the rules.
Do you have a cite for this? I’d be surprised as the FTC webpage linked to above appears to say otherwise, and I would expect them to keep their page current.
---
### Author:  [@Rhubarb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rhubarb)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/8 "2006-06-18T00:51:08Z")
I saw a brief article about this today in the [Fort Worth Star-Telegram](http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/business/14842388.htm). according to the article, it is illegal in most cases.
> [@Star-Telegram](#):
>
> Worse than a chain letter, an e-mail making the rounds in recent weeks claims that telemarketers are soon going to have access to cellphone numbers. It’s not true, according to the Federal Communications Commission.
So maybe they hit your cellphone by way of their general shotgun approach to marketing (I’ve had a couple - in Spanish, no less). The Do Not Call list should end this problem for you.
---
### Author:  [@Sierra\_Indigo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sierra_Indigo)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 12:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/9 "2006-06-18T00:54:46Z")
So hang on, just to clarify - If you have a cellphone, and I want to call you (say from my cellphone) that would cost me minutes that I’ve paid for, plus it would cost you minutes that you paid for on your own plan? And if you get unwanted calls like marketing or wrong numbers, you have to pay for them as well?
That’s a pretty ass-backward system. Everybody loses except for the phone companies.
---
### Author:  [@drachillix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/drachillix)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/10 "2006-06-18T01:22:21Z")
> [@Sierra Indigo](#):
>
> That’s a pretty ass-backward system. Everybody loses except for the phone companies.
I believe from their POV its called the perfect system.
---
### Author:  [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/11 "2006-06-18T02:15:36Z")
> [@Number](#):
>
> Er, really? I thought the plan to open up cell phones to telemarketing was an urban legend. [Snopes](http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/cell411.asp) says so, as does the [linked page](http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/04/dnc.htm) from the Federal Trade Commission.
>
> Did the Cingular rep provide any cites for the regulation changes?
The Cingular rep did not offer a site. What I quoted is what he sent.
> [@Rhubarb](#):
>
> (I’ve had a couple - in Spanish, no less)
Yeah, these were recorded messages in Spanish.
> [@Sierra Indigo](#):
>
> So hang on, just to clarify - If you have a cellphone, and I want to call you (say from my cellphone) that would cost me minutes that I’ve paid for, plus it would cost you minutes that you paid for on your own plan? And if you get unwanted calls like marketing or wrong numbers, you have to pay for them as well?
That’s mostly correct; only I think that Cingular-to-Cingular calls are free. (I’m not certain though.)
---
### Author:  [@tofergregg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tofergregg)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 2:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/12 "2006-06-18T02:23:32Z")
> [@Sierra Indigo](#):
>
> So hang on, just to clarify - If you have a cellphone, and I want to call you (say from my cellphone) that would cost me minutes that I’ve paid for, plus it would cost you minutes that you paid for on your own plan? And if you get unwanted calls like marketing or wrong numbers, you have to pay for them as well?
Let me guess – you’re not in the U.S.? When I lived in Australia, I was surprised to find out that calls I _received_ on my mobile phone were free for me, and that I only paid for outgoing calls. I was used to the U.S. system where you pay for all calls (or at least minutes get used up on each call). I liked the Australian system better, although that said I still paid through the nose for service compared to the U.S. rates.
-Tofer
---
### Author:  [@tofergregg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tofergregg)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2006, 2:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/13 "2006-06-18T02:25:57Z")
p.s. Furthermore, it costs more in Australia to call a mobile phone, no matter who is doing the calling. I.e., if I want to call you on your landline, it will cost $x per minute (or a flat fee per month, etc.), but if I want to call you on your mobile it will cost $x+y per minute. I normally gave people my landline number and had it forwarded to my mobile phone, so I ate the cost of getting calls on my mobile and others didn’t need to pay for it.
-Tofer
---
### Author:  [@Number](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Number)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2006, 11:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/14 "2006-06-19T23:00:17Z")
I can’t find any references to regulation changes on Google News, and the FCC’s page seems pretty [emphatic](http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/truthaboutcellphones.html) that these kinds of calls are still illegal.
> [@](#):
>
> - Establishing a wireless 411 directory is only in the idea stage, at present.
>
> - Even if a wireless 411 directory is established, most telemarketing calls to cell phones would still be illegal. For example, it is unlawful for any person to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with express prior consent) using any automatic telephone dialing system or any artificial or prerecorded voice to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, mobile telephone service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call. This prohibition applies regardless of whether the number is listed on the Federal Government’s National Do-Not-Call Registry.
---
### Author:  [@Harmonious\_Discord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonious_Discord)
#### Post date: [June 20, 2006, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/15 "2006-06-20T00:02:53Z")
In Wisconsin our local Do Not Call laws are a lot beter than the Federal. Last year the telemarketing companies put a lot of effort into getting the Wisconsin law declared illegal or to get a ruling saying that the Federal law over rules our’s. This year I have heard about three attemps at calling that are illegal. It’s great to not be harassed, and all the states should pass the same law. It’s funded by the yearly fee for the list, and all unused funds are given back to the marketers at the end of the year. Now we need to get a list going for political calls. You shouldn’t have to listen to multiple campain calls that average five minutes.
---
### Author:  [@Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otto)
#### Post date: [June 20, 2006, 12:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/16 "2006-06-20T00:17:32Z")
> [@Harmonious Discord](#):
>
> You shouldn’t have to listen to multiple campain calls that average five minutes.
Hang up.
---
### Author:  [@Harmonious\_Discord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonious_Discord)
#### Post date: [June 20, 2006, 1:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/17 "2006-06-20T01:30:58Z")
> [@Otto](#):
>
> Hang up.
They leave them on the answering machine and are up to five minutes each. The answering machine won’t erase until a message is played back fully once. You come home to a full machine and the calls that matter are not recorded, because the 15 minutes are used up.
---
### Author:  [@Declan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Declan)
#### Post date: [June 20, 2006, 6:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/paying-to-be-annoyed/361014/18 "2006-06-20T06:17:55Z")
> [@Harmonious Discord](#):
>
> They leave them on the answering machine and are up to five minutes each. The answering machine won’t erase until a message is played back fully once. You come home to a full machine and the calls that matter are not recorded, because the 15 minutes are used up.
Do you have the option of hitting 3 3 , that bypasses the voice message on my land line, but I dont know if cell voice mail boxes can do the same thing.
Declan