No question. Some people seem to have gone fucking insane on this board.
Now that you’ve decided he’s a rapist shitbag who calls his victim a liar… do you think that maybe he was lying about knowingly having a Nazi tattoo, or are you still gonna cling to the whole “boys gonna be boys” thing about that?
I’ll say it once again for maybe the hundredth time - @Smapti, you’re a fucking weirdo.
Some of us realize that reprehensible people are generally reprehensible in many different ways. Getting a Nazi tattoo is reprehensible. People who get Nazi tattoos are almost always reprehensible people. It’s no surprise, then, that he’s reprehensible in other ways too.
Him not knowing it was a Nazi tattoo fits the evidence. It’s as simple as that.
And we’ve decided he was a rapist because an anti-progressive propaganda putlet published an unsubstantiated claim by a woman who says she came forward because of her sympathy for Brett Kavanaugh supporters, timed strategically to try to force him out of the race.
I don’t know how you don’t recognize a ratfuck when it’s right in front of you.
You’re way out in left field on this one.
This is a weird hill to die on, since he’s really going to drop out.
Well, that was a nice Senate majority we almost had. I hope your moral purity is worth the national abortion ban Collins will vote for next year.
The allegation has multiple points of contemporary support, including messages and conversations with multiple friends long before Platner was politically relevant.
You’re a weirdo.
Let’s go Troy Jackson!
Then why isn’t he being prosecuted?
Because it never happened and this is a politically motivated hit job by Democratic insiders to sabotage any chance of a progressive getting into the Senate.
“Why isn’t he being prosecuted,” he asks about the information that was first published just over 2 hours ago.
For the same reasons why most rapists never get prosecuted? Plus, of course, the accusation dropped like two hours ago?
Trump wasn’t prosecuted for raping E. Jean Carroll, for reasons such as the narrow definition of rape in New York at the time of the offense and the statue of limitations. That doesn’t mean he didn’t do it. A jury adjudicated that he had raped her by the commonly-held definition of the term.
While I generally believe people are “should not be considered legally guilty until proven in court”, that doesn’t mean that everyone not yet prosecuted has never done anything wrong.
Yeah, I was being told the same thing two years ago when I was saying Bidien dropping out was a bad idea and if he did Trump would win.
Guess who wound up being right about that?
Go to therapy.
I guess whatever you say from here on out is undoubtedly correct, no matter how ridiculous, oh prognosticator of prognosticators. Should we build the shrine to you now or after you’re dead?
I wore a red shirt the other day and it was raining. I guess my shirt makes it rain.
There’s no way Biden staying in the race would have been better. Zero. In all likelihood, no Democrat would have won because incumbents were being defeated globally in reaction to inflation, as stupid as it was. Trump lucked out by riding that wave back into office.
If Biden had stayed in the race he would have won, but he was sabotaged by the Democratic establishment.
If Platner stays in the race he will win, but he’s being sabotaged by the Democratic establishment.
The parallels are right there for anyone to see.
Dude. Do you track your predictions? Or do you cherry-pick one conditional prediction, state with confidence that it’s right even though there’s no way to know, since the condition wasn’t met, and use that to justify your prophetic powers?