By whom? Are you speaking as subject or object here?
Again, as already stated, it demonstrably is for most people. It’s also true for yourself in regards to non-personal domains.
By whom? Are you speaking as subject or object here?
Again, as already stated, it demonstrably is for most people. It’s also true for yourself in regards to non-personal domains.
There’s no way to tell what your point is. That is your point.
You say this, but I don’t trust humans to tell the truth - I am still correct.
What else should we do, then? You say we can’t believe anything someone else says to be true, because it’s illogical. Is believing everything they say is false any more logical? How can we interpret what others say without illogical faith?
Well said.
There’s an idea that robot replacing menial jobs is OK because robots can’t replace more intellectual or artistic pursuits. This is wrong.
Someday AIs will be better than humans not only at poetry but all art. At some point machines will start making art only other machines can appreciate. We’ll be like chimpanzees trying to understand human art.
Damn. Now you tell me.
This is what they’ve found out about mafioso, that the very top lead relatively normal lives, but it was a bitch to be one of the peons.
I’m with you guessing that the OP is in (his/her) teens. When my son was three or so, he discovered the shock value of saying potty words. Of course, he was only three so that was all he had to say. One thinks that the OP has discovered the shock value of saying empathy is bad.
Yes.