# Peoples hang ups with science, what gives?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/peoples-hang-ups-with-science-what-gives/661721>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 23, 2013, 7:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/peoples-hang-ups-with-science-what-gives/661721 "2013-06-23T19:44:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Critical1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3e96dc/32.png) [@Critical1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Critical1)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2013, 2:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/peoples-hang-ups-with-science-what-gives/661721/81 "2013-07-16T02:01:08Z")

</div>

> [@Sinaptics](#):
>
> I feel like you’re getting bogged down by my examples.
> 
> My overall point was: No we don’t have current evidence. Yes it may still be possible however unlikely. My default status is to disregard the question until more evidence, yea or nay, is forthcoming.

The current and overwhelming evidence is in support of human imagination as the sole source of the creator. This is the bit that bogs me down, you are saying you are agnostic about things that have clearly been made up.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/peoples-hang-ups-with-science-what-gives/661721.md?page=4)