# Percentage increase calculation

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/percentage-increase-calculation/464742
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [September 22, 2008, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/percentage-increase-calculation/464742 "2008-09-22T20:38:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2008, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/percentage-increase-calculation/464742/1 "2008-09-22T20:38:53Z")

</div>

Bloody tacher forgot to mention we needed to know something for a test, so the sooner I get an answer the better. [Leelu]Plaese halp![/Leelu]

Basically, how do I figure percent increases?

Let’s say I do my calculations and find that productivity increased from 127 units/input to 167 units/input. Or whatever.

Is the calc for percent change as follows?

167/127 = 1.31 ~ 131% (subtract 100% for base value = 31% increase

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2008, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/percentage-increase-calculation/464742/2 "2008-09-22T20:47:39Z")

</div>

The equation is:

127 + 127x = 167  
127x = 40  
x = 40/127  
x = 0.315

So the percentage increase is 31.5%

(edit: Or your way is quicker. You’re saying 167 is 131% of 127, which essentially answers the same question, except you have to subtract the 1 at the end.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Santo\_Rugger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e95f7d/32.png) [@Santo\_Rugger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Santo_Rugger)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2008, 8:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/percentage-increase-calculation/464742/3 "2008-09-22T20:48:38Z")

</div>

Yes. Keep in mind that if the numbers were reversed, it wouldn’t be a 31% decrease, though, it’d be a 127/167 = .76, 1-.76 = 24% decrease.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Chessic\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7c8e57/32.png) [@Chessic\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chessic_Sense)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2008, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/percentage-increase-calculation/464742/4 "2008-09-22T20:55:22Z")

</div>

Change divided by origninal, or (new-old)/old. As was said above, the denominator must always be the old value, even when decreasing.

ETA: My favorite math rule, because it comes up everywhere- “Of means multiply”. So if you say that something went up 35%, the complete statement would be “Jim added on 35% \*\*of \*\*his previous weight.” or the “stock lost 25% \*\*of \*\*its value.” Thus, it’s Jimnew = Jimold +.35xJimold.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)
#### Post date: [September 22, 2008, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/percentage-increase-calculation/464742/5 "2008-09-22T21:22:18Z")

</div>

Thanks. Where I get messed up is because I didn’t know we needed it, and I forgot to take off the 100% base on my quickly-figured-out version. Fortunately, the test was administered so badly that the entire thing will be regiven. Now, if I can only figure what some of the more exotic terms meant.
