On an average evening shift at my Walgreens, I can count on at least three people asking me, “Don’t you have a penny?” and when I say, “Sorry, not at the moment”, looking around on the ground, usually futilely.
…and THEN (and this is what really chaps my hide)–they pull out…ANOTHER FRIGGIN’ DOLLAR BILL.
It’s not that they’re short, see–it’s that they’re Karl Gauss, and they think they should be given free money.
And, FWIW, aside from the occasional little kid who just doesn’t “get” how money works and only has a dollar for his $1 snack which will require $1.01, it’s overwhemingly a twenty/thirty/forty-something guy thing, too.
So if Walgreens gives away 3 cents a night, times 365 nights, times 6000 stores, that’s $65,700 a year. Explain to me, please, why Walgreens, a profit-making arm of capitalism, should donate $66,000 a year to people who think the world should give them free money. “Customer care”? Is it “customer care” to hand free money to people? We already have an array of IMO truly astonishing loss-leader coupons every week; “Loss-leader” means we lose money on them, every time someone comes in and buys, for example, ONLY the 3 oz. Turtles for 99 cents-with-coupon. Isn’t that enough? You want us to GIVE him a free penny, too, after we already lost $1.50 on the Turtles? So his purchase will cost us $1.51, instead of only $1.50? Multiply that by 6,000 stores.
Plus, you think I and all nine other Service Clerks at my store ought to have a raise of 5 cents an hour? Fine with me–except that, once again, we’re back to why Walgreens Corporate should dip into its own pocketbook in order to fund Karl Gauss. We’re not talking about “Giving to charity” here; we’re not talking the United Way or the Salvation Army. We’re talking about simply giving money to people at random. You might as well ask a businessman to grab fistfuls of cash from his till and walk around in the street outside his place of business, handing it out. The question is “why should he?” Giving people money isn’t going to make them patronize his business any more than they already were going to. By and large, they’ll just take the money and run, congratulating themselves on having been on hand the day some poor charitable sap decided to share the wealth.