This armchair philosopher’s opinions:
Logic does count, thanks. And so, incidentally, does science. Science is a branch of philosophy. Without philosophy, there’d be no science as we know it. In fact, science, religion, and logic are all sibling branches of epistemology. You can look at the branches, something like this:
Philosophy
|
Metaphysics — Epistemology — Aesthetics — Ethics
|
Science — Logic — Religion
The underlying foundation of science is a philosophical principle known as “falsifiability”. For a theory to be scientific in nature, it must risk falsification; that is, it must be vulnerable to testing by experiment whether it is false. Philosophers, like the notable Karl Popper, helped formulate modern science.
Meanwhile, elsewhere… In epistemology, philosophy has given you modal logic, which has vital applications in computer science. In metaphysics, philosophy has given you quantum reality, a means of contextualizing the claims of quantum physics. (“The ontology of materialism rested upon the illusion that the kind of existence, the direct ‘actuality’ of the world around us, can be extrapolated into the atomic range. This extrapolation, however, is impossible . . . Atoms are not things.” — Werner Heisenberg). In aesthetics, philosophy has given you everything from music theory to modern art. In ethics, philosophy has given you democratic government, law, and libertarianism.
One of the unfair questions you mentioned. If you ask the same question of technology, limiting answers only to theoretical technology, you’d be hard pressed to get a response. But practical applications of philosophy, like religion for example, have helped to make your life better by making the lives of others (and therefore the world around you) better. For all the faults of religion, it has given you charities based on philosophies of love that lift people out of dispair and hopelessness. Practical applications of ethics have prevented you and those you love from being used as scientific quinea pigs. Practical applications of epistemology have given you schools, universities, and theories of learning. Practical applications of aesthetics have given you architectural wonders. Practical applications of metaphysics have given you computer artificial intelligence (primitive now, perhaps, but further advances may be pending.)
We already have. There is a branch of science that deals with the ethics of science. But I suspect that what you’re asking for is some sort of obective ethic, and are confusing it with being scientific in nature. Science will never be able to objectively arbitrate ethical disputes. Even if you know why someone behaves a certain and are able to manipulate it, the choice of which behavior is better than which is scientifically arbitrary.
