# Pin the ad on the hominem

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 29, 2004, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792 "2004-06-29T23:58:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 1:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/21 "2004-06-30T13:51:51Z")

</div>

Thanks, **Libertarian** ; you continue to pound nails into your own coffin, credibilitywise.

Brilliant illustration of the folly of an ad hominem attack (though I fear that was the opposite of your intent), with a little Amos’nAndy racism thrown in for good measure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/22 "2004-06-30T14:01:19Z")

</div>

Was there an incorrect fact? A lie to be found anywhere? That’s quite a double standard you have there, Kimo Sabe. If Moore had written it, your slobber would be all over his ass. Incidentally, I might point out to you that some of those things outside your window there that are moving around are called “other people”. Your backhanded attempt at disrespecting me by refusing to use my correct username deprives new people of knowing whom you were addressing. Not that you care about them, but still.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/23 "2004-06-30T14:03:30Z")

</div>

Just to clarify: the ad hominems I’m addressing in the OP and in my last post above are the ones that can be paraphrased, roughly: _“Michael Moore/MLKjr/[Whoever] once said or did [X], so Idon’t have to engage with the substance of ANYTHING he EVER says, EVER again: we take this as permission to make the entire discussion about the MESSENGER and completely ignore the MESSAGE.”_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/24 "2004-06-30T14:08:21Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> I don’t know about copout, but it’s a great scam.

Freely given does not equal a scam. I’ve bought them lunches too, at other restaurants. I’m pretty sure it evens out. And in **Airman** ’s case, he’s bright. Whether he comes out of the movie pro or anti, his views on it will be worth reading, and they will then be _his_ views. Worth it to me. YMMV

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/25 "2004-06-30T14:09:52Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Just to clarify: the ad hominems I’m addressing in the OP and in my last post above are the ones that can be paraphrased, roughly: _“Michael Moore/MLKjr/[Whoever] once said or did [X], so Idon’t have to engage with the substance of ANYTHING he EVER says, EVER again: we take this as permission to make the entire discussion about the MESSENGER and completely ignore the MESSAGE.”_

That particular sort of ad hominem is called “poisoned well”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/26 "2004-06-30T14:14:02Z")

</div>

> [@Libertarian](#):
>
> Was there an incorrect fact? A lie to be found anywhere? That’s quite a double standard you have there, Kimo Sabe.

Just when I thought my jaw couldn’t drop any lower. So you take the facts, and spin them to support an emotionally informed opinion, in order to attack Moore for doing the same thing? Hypocritical fuck.

> [@Libertarian](#):
>
> If Moore had written it, your slobber would be all over his ass.

And this goes to prove that YOU’RE the one posting from a vacuum, Libertarian. I’ve made it abundantly clear, in previous posts, that I have a pretty clear-eyed view of Moore’s strengths AND his weaknesses. I have called him a propagandist and a polemicist. But I have also said that this does not invalidate the truth, such truth as there is, to be found in his stuff.

> [@Libertarian](#):
>
> Incidentally, I might point out to you that some of those things outside your window there that are moving around are called “other people”. Your backhanded attempt at disrespecting me by refusing to use my correct username deprives new people of knowing whom you were addressing. Not that you care about them, but still.

I _am_ using your correct username, Altria. Your shameful attempt to shed the baggage of your own history is reprehensible and dishonest, and I won’t support it. I use your real name specifically with new Dopers in mind, so they know what a dishonest fuck you are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/27 "2004-06-30T14:15:03Z")

</div>

**Lib** -

Brilliant. Absolutely fucking brilliant.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/28 "2004-06-30T14:18:23Z")

</div>

> [@Lissener](#):
>
> Just when I thought my jaw couldn’t drop any lower. So you take the facts, and spin them to support an emotionally informed opinion, in order to attack Moore for doing the same thing? Hypocritical fuck.

Idiot. I was illustrating what he does. Have someone read the post’s first line to you.

> [@](#):
>
> I am using your correct username, Altria. Your shameful attempt to shed the baggage of your own history is reprehensible and dishonest, and I won’t support it. I use your real name specifically with new Dopers in mind, so they know what a dishonest fuck you are.

I reckon that dishonest is as dishonest does. One of us is using the other’s registered username. One of us is not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/29 "2004-06-30T14:18:25Z")

</div>

Correct me if I’m wrong, as I haven’t seen Fahrenheit 9/11, but isn’t a substantial portion of **it** an ad hominem attack on Dubya?

And then there’s the hatchet job on Heston from Bowling for Columbine.

Of course, one man’s ad hominem is another man’s “Telling it like it **is** , man!”

I, for one, enjoyed your deftly contructed parody, Liberal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/30 "2004-06-30T14:19:33Z")

</div>

Thank you, Shodan and Candid. An honor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/31 "2004-06-30T14:23:51Z")

</div>

> [@This Year's Model](#):
>
> . . . I’ve bought them lunches too, at other restaurants. I’m pretty sure it evens out. . . .

This is why if it’s not a scam, it’s a copout: your money is going where you don’t want it to go, just indirectly. So you trade cash depending on the restaurant. What do they care? The bottom line is the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/32 "2004-06-30T14:28:23Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> Correct me if I’m wrong, as I haven’t seen Fahrenheit 9/11, but isn’t a substantial portion of **it** an ad hominem attack on Dubya?
> 
> And then there’s the hatchet job on Heston from Bowling for Columbine.
> 
> Of course, one man’s ad hominem is another man’s “Telling it like it **is** , man!”
> 
> I, for one, enjoyed your deftly contructed parody, Liberal.

Please read the thread before you post. I’ve acknowledged that Moore is a propagandist and a polemicist. I don’t, however, use that as an excuse to ignore everything he says–baby, bathwater, and all.

In the first place.

In the second place, Moore’s an entertainer; Bush is the “elected” leader of the free world. An examination of Bush as a person is certainly more relevant in that context, if you ask me. Moore is not making \*decisions \* that decide the life or death of millions of people; he’s just a standup comic with a political POV and a camera.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![duffer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duffer/32/1026_2.png) [@duffer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/duffer)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/33 "2004-06-30T14:33:50Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Just when I thought my jaw couldn’t drop any lower. **I use your real name** specifically with new Dopers in mind, so they know what a dishonest fuck you are.

Yup, I bet that’s the name on his birth certificate! Oh wait, could it be a username? :smack: My bad.

God save us all if **lissener** isn’t around to inform all new Dopers on who’s who over the history of the SDMB. Thank you for keeping us up to date, **december.**

Huh? (hang on, I’m getting a call here, you can all listen in)

What the hell do you mean I can’t attribute a name to **lissener?** Oh, fine, he pulls out an old username, gives it to someone that publicly changed his name, and won’t let it go. Even goes so far as to quote a current post under a retired name. Fine, I’ll retract the december remark. But I won’t stop thinking it!"

OK, the call is over, back to the thread. Hope it wasn’t too loud, I hate to stir up shit. :rolleyes:

Oh and\*\* Liberal\*\*, you’re pissing me off with all the agreeing I’m doing here. Dick. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/34 "2004-06-30T14:39:46Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> This is why if it’s not a scam, it’s a copout: your money is going where you don’t want it to go, just indirectly. So you trade cash depending on the restaurant. What do they care? The bottom line is the same.

They don’t care; I do. Whether you believe I am compromising my moral purity or not is pretty much irrelevant. It’s a compromise I can live with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/35 "2004-06-30T14:43:03Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Please read the thread before you post. I’ve acknowledged that Moore is a propagandist and a polemicist. I don’t, however, use that as an excuse to ignore everything he says–baby, bathwater, and all.
> 
> In the first place.
> 
> In the second place, Moore’s an entertainer; Bush is the “elected” leader of the free world. An examination of Bush as a person is certainly more relevant in that context, if you ask me. Moore is not making \*decisions \* that decide the life or death of millions of people; he’s just a standup comic with a political POV and a camera.

Oh, I did.

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Thanks, Libertarian; you continue to pound nails into your own coffin, credibilitywise.
> 
> Brilliant illustration of **the folly of an ad hominem attack** (though I fear that was the opposite of your intent), with a little Amos’nAndy racism thrown in for good measure.

His was a work of parody to illustrate one of the problems with Moore’s style. It’s sort of strange for you to take issue with Airman’s ad hominem and Liberal’s (parody) ad hominem and not Moore’s ad hominem. Seems inconsistent. Maybe it isn’t, in your mind.

And the problem with your second comment is while Moore is a standup comic with a camera and a political POV, there’s a portion of the population salivating for the next chapter of the Gospel of Saint Moore, and that’s dangerous.

I view President Bush as dishonest and irresponsible… but two wrong’s don’t make a right, and I’m not going to give Moore a pass on the same stuff.

When someone distorts the truth consistently and repeatedly it only makes sense to begin to doubt everything they say, unless supported by outside sources.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/36 "2004-06-30T14:51:22Z")

</div>

> [@This Year's Model](#):
>
> I think the principle is that **Airman** doesn’t want to give Moore any of **Airman** ’s money. I’ve gone with co-workers a couple of times to a restaurant that I despise, and won’t willingly give my money to. Each time a co-worker has bought my lunch so I would go with them. Is that a cop-out?

In my opinion, that has nothing to do with principle, and everything to do with being cheap. Same thing with AD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/37 "2004-06-30T14:54:43Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> . . . His was a work of parody to illustrate one of the problems with Moore’s style. . . .

Hm. If that’s the case, then I was rather thoroughly whooshed. I thought he was suggesting that an ad hominem approach to an issue is perfectly valid; that we should judge King’s words with his past actions in mind, and thereby find them lacking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/38 "2004-06-30T15:00:39Z")

</div>

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> And the problem with your second comment is while Moore is a standup comic with a camera and a political POV, there’s a portion of the population salivating for the next chapter of the Gospel of Saint Moore, and that’s dangerous. . . .

So . . . you’re attacking Moore because the \*public \* is retarded?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/39 "2004-06-30T15:10:13Z")

</div>

(sorry for the fragmented responses; at work)

> [@CandidGamera](#):
>
> When someone distorts the truth consistently and repeatedly it only makes sense to begin to doubt everything they say, unless supported by outside sources.

Moore’s work doesn’t distort the truth any more than any other editorialist. He forms an opinion based on certain facts, and he then turns around and presents those facts in such a way as to illustrate his opinion. He leaves out facts that aren’t part of his argument, but that’s certainly standard for a making a “persuasive”-style argument. He IS trying to make a point, he is NOT trying to shed an objective light on the subject at hand. He sees things that outrage him, and he’s sharing that outrage. Live with it or get over it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2004, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792/40 "2004-06-30T15:12:44Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> So . . . you’re attacking Moore because the \*public \* is retarded?

Well, if you are suggesting that much of Moore’s core audience is retarded, perhaps Moore needs to be more careful with his facts.

A lot of people don’t know that Moore plays fast and loose with his accusations. Lots of Moore fans don’t care, and therefore aren’t likely to call Moore when he tells a whopper. Conservatives and/or those with a commitment to truth-telling, do care, and have therefore pointed out many instances in the past where Moore has been dishonest.

Being dishonest is wrong. Those who don’t know when it is happening, and those who don’t care when it is happening because it gores somebody’s else’s ox, aren’t going to correct the wrong. That leaves it up to the rest of us.

If you don’t know that Moore is dishonest, that’s one thing. If you do know, and don’t care, that is quite another.

Regards,  
Shodan

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pin-the-ad-on-the-hominem/252792.md?page=3)
