I’ve always thought music reviews were just a weird product. It’s so subjective that I don’t know what sort of value there is in reviewing it.
I could see the value in reviewing in aggregate - like these polls - where a lot of people share what they like. And I can see individualized suggestions, like “if you like this and this, try this”, but just writing an article to review about an album is weird.
I wonder how they did this poll. If they had ranking, or just said “what are your favorite 10 albums” and added them up or what.
It’s weighed pretty heavily towards indie rock. Not a lot of any sort of non-pop electronic - and electronic is a really broad genre and I kind of hate when it gets pigeonholed as electronica/techno.
Very radiohead heavy. I think In Rainbows is their best album (and deserves to be near the top) and probably Hail to the Thief is the second best, but that’s way down at the bottom of the list. I thought most of their stuff before those two albums is fairly overrated.
Interpol’s inclusion at 22 sort of annoys me… Interpol basically has one song, and they made 10 albums out of slight variations of it. It’s not a terrible song, but their popularity among indie rock eludes me.
The a few of the Radiohead and the two Godspeed! You Black Emporer albums are the only ones here that I actually own, although I’ve really not bought albums since the pandora/spotify era.
DJ Shadow - Endtroducing is pretty good, and, incidentally, the only time I’ve ever heard music with “DJ” in the name that was actually good.
Aphex Twin - Richard D James album is probably not their best album nor that great a representative of the sort of IDM/glitch genre.
I’m not familiar with about a third of this list. I think I’m going to check out some of it on spotify. To those of you talking about the pitchfork crowd - what’s the reputation of Pitchfork and their readers?