Nope, sorry but you’re still wrong, and for two reasons: 1) Paterno wasn’t told that it was naked hugging. What he was told was ambiguous enough due to the fact that McQueary couldn’t seem to identify just what it was that he did see so as to leave room for the possibility that he had misinterpreted a more innocent explanation; and 2) you cannot say with certainty that naked hugging was the least innocent possibility for what was going on. McQueary testified that the famous “rhythmic slapping sounds” he heard only consisted of two or maybe three slaps and that Sandusky was not in fact hugging the boy but was holding him at the waist with both hands. For all we know the kid could have slipped and Sandusky caught him just as the kid put his hands against the wall to steady himself, at which point McQueary looked around the corner and saw what he mistook for anal sex.