on 25. Aug 2003 08:50 grant pittman wrote:
> In Canada it is certainly ok as long as you aren’t raking/collecting. I’m sure this
> holds true in the U.S also. GRANT PITTMAN
It depends on local statutes, usually at the state level. You can use google or some other search engine to find your states statutes on-line.
For example, from Chapter 47, Gambling, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes:
§ 47.02. Gambling
(a) A person commits an offense if he:
(1) makes a bet on the partial or final result of a game or contest or on the performance of a participant in a game or contest;
(2) makes a bet on the result of any political nomination, appointment, or election or on the degree of success of any nominee, appointee, or candidate; or
(3) plays and bets for money or other thing of value at any game played with cards, dice, balls, or any other gambling device.
(b) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the actor engaged in gambling in a private place;
(2) no person received any economic benefit other than personal winnings; and
(3) except for the advantage of skill or luck, the risks of losing and the chances of winning were the same for all participants.
© It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor reasonably believed that the conduct:
(1) was permitted under the Bingo Enabling Act (Article 179d, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes);
(2) was permitted under the Charitable Raffle Enabling Act (Article 179f, Revised Statutes);
(3) consisted entirely of participation in the state lottery authorized by the State Lottery Act (Chapter 466, Government Code);
(4) was permitted under the Texas Racing Act (Article 179e, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes); or
(5) consisted entirely of participation in a drawing for the opportunity to participate in a hunting, fishing, or other recreational event conducted by the Parks and Wildlife Department.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
(e) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that a person played for something of value other than money using an electronic, electromechanical, or mechanical contrivance excluded from the definition of “gambling device” under Section 47.01(4)(B).
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1981, 67th Leg., 1st C.S., p. 101, ch. 11, § 43, eff. Nov. 10, 1981; Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 957, § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 1990; Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 6, § 3; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 107, § 4.04, eff. Aug. 30, 1993; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 774, § 2, eff. Aug. 30, 1993. Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 14.53, eff. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 318, § 20, eff. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 931, § 79, eff. June 16, 1995; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1256, § 124, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
So, three stipulations must be satisfied in a valid defense: private place, no person economically benefitted other than personal winnings, AND everybody has the same chance of winning, excepting the advantage of skill or luck.
Your mileage may vary.
Paul Stine
College Station, TX