# Please explain Lauren Boebert

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [September 15, 2023, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163 "2023-09-15T14:41:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![InternetLegend](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/internetlegend/32/13154_2.png) [@InternetLegend](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/InternetLegend)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 9:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/101 "2023-09-16T21:54:49Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> But I don’t think what she’s doing would be considered adultery, not unless you’re one of those people who think that you have to stay married for life and divorce is against God. All she’s waiting on is legal paperwork. In any way that a Christian would care about, she has no commitment to her husband. There’s nothing in the Bible about waiting for divorce paperwork to be filed with the government.

Matthew 5: 31-32  
31 “It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’  
32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery."

So…

(To be clear, Protestant religions since Henry VIII found his marriage inconvenient have decided not to think about these verses, and I personally am a big fan of liberal divorce laws. But Someone did indeed have something to say about divorce, and it’s more than He said about abortion or homosexuality, if you’re a big proponent of doing things “because Jesus said so”.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 10:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/102 "2023-09-16T22:46:09Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> You consented to being publicly watched performing sexual acts in exchange for money, and you are a moron if you didn’t think your public show wasn’t being archived and put up on multiple other sites _in real time_ (not two years later) while you were performing them. That’s the reason for the ‘protected by DMCA’ watermarks, which everyone ignores.

I wish I could remember the source, but I remember reading an interview where someone asks Jenna Jameson what advice she’d give to young women interested in breaking into the porn business. Since I know most people who post here are dedicated to intellectual pursuits rather the pruient desire, by the mid 1990s, Jameson was one of the biggest porn actresses in the business. But from what I can recall about her advice, it went as follows:

1. Don’t be afraid to say no. If there’s a specific act you don’t want to do it’s okay to say no.
2. You don’t have to be particularly good looking. No matter how you look, _somebody_ wants to see you naked.
3. Choose your actor name carefully. Don’t go for something crass you’ll end up regretting later.
4. If you go into porn you need to realize it will follow you for the rest of your life.

We could argue all day whether it’s fair, but once you go into porn there’s a good chance you’re never going to walk away from it free and clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![F.U.Shakespeare](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/aca169/32.png) [@F.U.Shakespeare](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/F.U.Shakespeare)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/103 "2023-09-16T23:19:05Z")

</div>

ATF Form 4473 [(which is required in all fifty states when you buy a gun](https://www.wavy.com/news/investigative/your-gun-or-your-ganja-its-illegal-for-marijuana-users-to-own-a-gun/)) asks if you are using marijuana.

_“Your honor, it depends on what your definition of “are” is.”_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![InternetLegend](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/internetlegend/32/13154_2.png) [@InternetLegend](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/InternetLegend)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 11:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/104 "2023-09-16T23:28:31Z")

</div>

See, I’ve been wondering about this ever since I heard about this _Beetlejuice_ incident and the Hunter Biden indictment on the same day. Certainly the GOP would want the same law to apply to one of their own, right? Right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/105 "2023-09-16T23:31:22Z")

</div>

Is it anything more than speculation that she was vaping something with THC in it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![F.U.Shakespeare](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/aca169/32.png) [@F.U.Shakespeare](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/F.U.Shakespeare)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/106 "2023-09-16T23:32:48Z")

</div>

Nah! It’s common sense that _relatives_ of elected officials must be held to higher standards than the officials _themselves_. Although this is subject to change without notice. /s

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outlierrn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/outlierrn/32/3005_2.png) [@outlierrn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/outlierrn)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/107 "2023-09-16T23:49:18Z")

</div>

I think we can judge her the same way she would have judged an LGBTQ couple sitting next to her (including her own definition of adultery). Now, maybe she would have been ‘meh, I’m not on the clock.’ But we only have how she’s presented herself to know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![F.U.Shakespeare](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/aca169/32.png) [@F.U.Shakespeare](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/F.U.Shakespeare)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/108 "2023-09-16T23:56:19Z")

</div>

When I worked for the federal government, we were subject to random drugs tests, which seemed to occur more “randomly” if we had traveled out of the country, or to states where marijuana was legal.

\*_Lock her up! With a cup!_

\*In a bathroom.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2023, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/109 "2023-09-16T23:58:24Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> We could argue all day whether it’s fair, but once you go into porn there’s a good chance you’re never going to walk away from it free and clear.

Indeed, I don’t personally think having worked in the sex industry disqualifies Gibson from politics per se, it’s her lack of a basic understanding of contemporary American politics 101 and not thinking that it would come back to haunt her that disqualifies her. In other words, the fact that she is a moron disqualifies her. This is something she did publicly and left a record of; it’s not something like cocaine use in college that she could deny having done. I don’t even fault her and her attorney for trying to go on the attack and making the ridiculous accusation of it being revenge porn, her campaign is toast and there’s not much else she could try doing. She could deny having done it even though there is video evidence of it, but it would take a special kind of moron to try to do that… oh yeah, this is a Boebert thread. Never mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 12:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/110 "2023-09-17T00:06:37Z")

</div>

> [@InternetLegend](#):
>
> Matthew 5: 31-32  
> 31 “It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’

She’s divorcing him so that doesn’t even apply. Taking the verses literally just doesn’t work, not with the modern US legal system.

Honestly, I have never heard of someone being called an adulterer because the formality of the paperwork hasn’t finished completely, in a religious sense or otherwise.

As I said, if you want to attack her morals or call her a hypocrite that’s probably the weakest way to do it. There’s a whole plethora of options in her case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flurb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/51bf81/32.png) [@flurb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flurb)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/111 "2023-09-17T00:23:48Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> Indeed, I don’t personally think having worked in the sex industry disqualifies Gibson from politics per se, it’s her lack of a basic understanding of contemporary American politics 101 and not thinking that it would come back to haunt her that disqualifies her.

Gibson had a contested primary, for a very competitive seat that could give Republicans and Glenn Youngkin unified control of Virginia state government. Regardless of whether you or I find this conduct relevant to her ability to serve in the Legislature, she fucked over her party by concealing it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/112 "2023-09-17T00:24:07Z")

</div>

In the 1960s, when the Yippies fucked in public, it was to shock the national consciousness against the war. But this! This has no higher purpose, it’s just self-centered trashy sleaze.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/113 "2023-09-17T00:47:01Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> She’s divorcing him so that doesn’t even apply.

Well, her bible **definitely** doesn’t allow **that**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/114 "2023-09-17T00:51:42Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> She’s divorcing him so that doesn’t even apply. Taking the verses literally just doesn’t work, not with the modern US legal system.

The Bible definitely doesn’t permit a woman that kind of agency.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/115 "2023-09-17T00:59:33Z")

</div>

[https://www.meidastouch.com/news/republican-youth-conference-adds-lauren-boebert-amid-theater-scandal](https://www.meidastouch.com/news/republican-youth-conference-adds-lauren-boebert-amid-theater-scandal)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DoctorJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doctorj/32/2904_2.png) [@DoctorJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DoctorJ)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/116 "2023-09-17T01:56:05Z")

</div>

> [@Moriarty](#):
>
> Translation: I got so flustered being in public that I didn’t know how to conduct myself.

Or: I was already high as fuuuuuck when we got there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 2:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/117 "2023-09-17T02:01:53Z")

</div>

> [@Happy\_Lendervedder](#):
>
> Seriously, if they want to use the Bible as a weapon against others, it’s only fair to call them out on their flaming hypocrisy. Their weaponization and politicization of religion is as dangerous as anything they do.

From an NPR interview with Russell Moore, a former top official in the Southern Baptist Convention:

> It was the result of having multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching — “turn the other cheek” — [and] to have someone come up after to say, “Where did you get those liberal talking points?” And what was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, “I’m literally quoting Jesus Christ,” the response would not be, “I apologize.” The response would be, “Yes, but that doesn’t work anymore. That’s weak.” And when we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we’re in a crisis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/118 "2023-09-17T02:09:11Z")

</div>

Actually, most of Jesus’ teachings are very subversive to the way we run the world and the USA. But in this case, the quote is about the Southern Baptists finding themselves in a crisis. And a very different crisis than that of the world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 2:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/119 "2023-09-17T02:12:55Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> Honestly, I have never heard of someone being called an adulterer because the formality of the paperwork hasn’t finished completely, in a religious sense or otherwise.

I have, plenty of times. In fact, the usual assumption is that they must’ve already been cheating if they couldn’t wait until the divorce was final. Heck, if you don’t have the normal mourning period after a divorce, that is assumed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2023, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163/120 "2023-09-17T02:38:31Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> It’s fair to criticize her moral failings in light of these kinds of attacks:

She is certainly a reviler. Not to mention greed, And what she did in the audience could be considered sexual immorality. But it is adultery.

**Luke 16:18**  
_Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery._

**Romans 7:3**  
_Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress._

Either you follow the New testament, or you do not.

Personally I think Paul went too far, and neither he nor many Christians after h9im actually followed the teachings of Jesus.

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> And what was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, “I’m literally quoting Jesus Christ,” the response would not be, “I apologize.” The response would be, “Yes, but that doesn’t work anymore. That’s weak.” And when we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we’re in a crisis.

Exactly.

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> She’s divorcing him so that doesn’t even apply. Taking the verses literally just doesn’t work, not with the modern US legal system.
> 
> Honestly, I have never heard of someone being called an adulterer because the formality of the paperwork hasn’t finished completely, in a religious sense or otherwise.

Sure. But in the US Legal system, being gay or trans or a TV is all legal. That doesnt stop her from trying to make that illegal.

I just gave you some verses. They are just as valid as: Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

So if gay sex is a sin, then she is an adulterer.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-explain-lauren-boebert/990163.md?page=7)
