Actually you must be able to provide physical proof via e-mail to claim the prize. That would be a neat trick. Like I always say when I can download a cheese burger I will be impressed. You do know that page is a joke, right?
My personal favorite of the phenomenon is Gerardus Bouw, a Ph.D in astronomy, who signed up for geocentrism on scriptural grounds (see also Wiki).
Are you sure about that? Really sure?
How about this offer, is that a joke too? Are you sure? Of course, challenges of this type are never serious, but that doesn’t mean they are deliberate jokes.
Anyway, I’d love to know if the professor in the OP can refute the claims made, or if he’ll even agree with them.
From the MAd Revisionist:
And no, your second cite is not a joke at all. The fact that you apparently cannot see the distinction between the two “challenges” is…disturbing.
Please, guys – spelling! You’re bringing back unpleasant memories of the imdb boards.
If we didn’t go to the Moon, what have we been doing with that flying saucer technology from Roswell?
Seriously, one thing I’m curious about (although not enough to read through all of Hoagland’s garbage): what do these nuts say about the Apollo 15 - Apollo 17 missions, and all that film of driving over the Lunar surface (with its eerie clarity and deceptively close horizon) in that groovy electric dune buggy known as a Lunar Rover? That must have been one big soundstage!
I imagine that there’s at least one person out there who will claim, with a straight face, that they can recognize at least some features from Monument Valley in that footage.
Monument Valley is pretty amazing. I’ve also been to the badlands of southern Utah; that area’s been used to stand in for an alien planet in several movies.
I agree.
It’s not a completely unreasonable idea, really. If you begin with the assumption that the moon landings must be faked, it would be one relatively accessible location where the hoaxers could find some otherworldly-seeming terrain. I just think that finding, or claiming to have found, any point for point correlation between Monument Valley and the lunar moonscape as shown in the Apollo films and photos is too far-fetched to take seriously.
It’s done with minatures on a sound stage. That’s why it looks so convincing. If it were real it would look more fake.
Stranger
Yes, I’m quite sure. Read the rest of the site.
Hovind isn’t joking; he’s just ignorant. You honestly can’t tell the difference?
To continue (briefly) on the Hovind sidetrack, look at what Hovind demands as “proof” of evolution:
[quote]
When I use the word evolution, I am not referring to the minor variations found in all of the various life forms (microevolution). I am referring to the general theory of evolution which believes these five major events took place without God:
[ol][li]Time, space, and matter came into existence by themselves. [/li][li]Planets and stars formed from space dust. [/li][li]Matter created life by itself. [/li][li]Early life-forms learned to reproduce themselves. [/li][li]Major changes occurred between these diverse life forms (i.e., fish changed to amphibians, amphibians changed to reptiles, and reptiles changed to birds or mammals).[/ol][/li][/quote]
Only his fourth point (sort of) anmd his fifth point even address actual evolutionary theory. The rest is the same sort of silliness that many Creationists frequently conflate with evolution that involves hypthoses of wholly separate scientific disciplines and are irrelevant to discussions of evolution.
I’ve read it. I was the one who linked to it, remember.
I never suggested otherwise. What I suggested was that the moon guy is equally serious, and equally ignorant. There are a lot of crazy people out there making similar offers in perfect seriousness.
Can you?
Are you sure?
Question for you: was I joking or serious?
Whether you’re serious is more than I can say. The moon guy, however, is not. It’s a parody of holocaust deniers. And a demonstration of how stubborn skepticism cannot be beaten into submission with any amount of evidence or reasoning.
I take exception to your use of the term skepticism. Holocaust deniers are not skeptics they are either idiots or rascists with an agenda.
He is not serious. It. Is. Meant. As. Parody.
Did the whole, send us physical proof via e-mail, not clue you in? Nothing physical can be sent via e-mail. What about their self described purpose that I quoted earlier the part that says:
Just like with gunfire!
:rolleyes: I know. I knew that when I first posted it. That fact appears to have gonee way over your head.
I don’t know what made any of us think you thought the “moon guy” was serious.
Oh wait I remember:
just can’t admit error, can you.