# Please recommend book about Watergate

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [June 19, 2002, 11:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832 "2002-06-19T11:38:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Carter\_of\_Mars](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/2bfe46/32.png) [@John\_Carter\_of\_Mars](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Carter_of_Mars)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 11:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/1 "2002-06-19T11:38:50Z")

</div>

A cow-orker has asked me for a book recommendation that would explain Watergate. This person is in her mid twenties, and didn’t live through it.  
I can’t think of a “primer” tybe of book that would explain the basics without being too politically biased, one way or the other.

Any ideas from the teeming millions?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plnnr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7ea924/32.png) [@plnnr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/plnnr)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 12:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/2 "2002-06-19T12:09:13Z")

</div>

All The President’s Men tells the complete story from the ground up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Carter\_of\_Mars](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/2bfe46/32.png) [@John\_Carter\_of\_Mars](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Carter_of_Mars)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/3 "2002-06-19T14:06:38Z")

</div>

Thank you, **plnnr**! I saw this movie years ago, but having never read the book, I wasn’t sure how well it was done. Thanks again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bonzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/45deac/32.png) [@bonzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bonzer)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 7:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/4 "2002-06-19T19:04:36Z")

</div>

Actually, I’m not sure I’d recommend the book of _All The President’s Men_ to a complete beginner, though it’s undoubtedly a great read. Not only is it primarily concerned with what Woodward and Bernstein were investigating, it was written with a contemporary audience in mind. It also stops before the end of the story (while their _The Final Days_ drops in right before the end without filling in the background). A clearer introduction to the whole scandel might be Fred Emery’s [Watergate](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684813238/qid=1024511130/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-8165698-1196829). He’s a well respected British journalist who was the Washington correspondent for _The Times_ during the events. For the anniversary of Nixon’s resignation, he made a TV series for the BBC in 1994 for which he interviewed most of the then surviving participants. If either you or your friend could get your hands on the series, that’d probably be ideal; otherwise, this is the book he wrote to accompany it. It’s notable largely for being a chronological narrative of the whole affair: he simply starts at the beginning and tells the story as clearly as he can. He doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary theorising or chasing dead ends. The style’s fairly dry and the tale, even straightened out, is unavoidably complicated, so it won’t be to everyone’s taste, but he doesn’t assume much background.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Carter\_of\_Mars](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/2bfe46/32.png) [@John\_Carter\_of\_Mars](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Carter_of_Mars)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/5 "2002-06-19T22:55:35Z")

</div>

Much thanks, **bonzer**. I think I’ll recommend both. Possibly read both myself, now that the subject has been brought back up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Labdad](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/439d5e/32.png) [@Labdad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Labdad)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/6 "2002-06-19T23:05:42Z")

</div>

Believe it or not, \*\*\*[The Palace Guard](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005WK6O/qid=1024527618/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/103-5680650-4092627) \*\*\* by Dan Rather is an excellent Watergate primer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jello](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f05b48/32.png) [@Jello](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jello)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/7 "2002-06-19T23:23:41Z")

</div>

John Dean’s _Blind Ambition_ is a good read, although not without bias. Meanwhile, _The Memoirs of Richard Nixon_ are boring as hell and extremely biased.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lawoot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/35a633/32.png) [@lawoot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lawoot)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2002, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/8 "2002-06-19T23:48:21Z")

</div>

For a less-than-serious point of view:

[Trout Fishing in the Reflecting Pool](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/044508314X/qid%3D1024530166/ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F0%5F1/103-2293015-3376624) by Nicholas Von Hoffman and Gary Trudeau (yes, of Doonesbury fame).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ennui](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ennui/32/3396_2.png) [@Ennui](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ennui)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2002, 4:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/9 "2002-06-20T04:48:21Z")

</div>

While not quite a pleasing read from a literary entreatment standpoint, [Silent Coup](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0312927630/qid=1024545720/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6722827-6096957) by Len Colodny and Stan Gettlin drew some high praise from some insiders to the affair (like John Mitchell and G. Gordon Liddy) even inspite of the rather frank treatment they received in the book.

The primary (but not the only) difference between S.C. and Blind Ambition-All the Presidents Men is the roll of John Dean. Dean sued the authors for libel and from what I understand has had[great difficulties](http://www.watergate.com/silentcoup/Motion.htm) in not only in proving that what Colodny and Gettlin wrote was libelous, but he couldn’t prove that it wasn’t true.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OttoDaFe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ottodafe/32/356_2.png) [@OttoDaFe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OttoDaFe)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2002, 5:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/10 "2002-06-20T05:49:50Z")

</div>

How the Good Guys Finally Won by Jimmy Breslin.

Its main distinction is that it concentrates on the _political_ events leading up to Nixon’s resignation rather than the burglary/coverup itself. It’s also rabidly partisan–the major player is Tip O’Neill (that burbling sound is a regiment of conservatives frothing at the mouth), so don’t bother if you’re looking for an impartial rendering of the facts of the case.

But it’s an entertaining read, and (to me) a very interesting insight into the behind-the-scenes maneuvering that accompanied the impeachment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![partly\_warmer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bc8723/32.png) [@partly\_warmer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/partly_warmer)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2002, 6:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-recommend-book-about-watergate/114832/11 "2002-06-20T06:47:59Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Labdad \*  
> \*\*Believe it or not, \*\*\*[The Palace Guard](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005WK6O/qid=1024527618/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/103-5680650-4092627) \*\*\* by Dan Rather is an excellent Watergate primer. \*\*

Absolutely. This is one of the clearest and briefest descriptions of events. And the implications. Even though it has a nice unbiased approach, the conclusions are considerably more chilling than I anticipated.

After having lived through those times, as the “Who” once noted, you can only wish “we won’t get fooled again”.
