# Please tell me about "git" (noun)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [July 14, 2006, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534 "2006-07-14T20:39:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2006, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/1 "2006-07-14T20:39:43Z")

</div>

I picked up this word on the boards and I like it a lot because it’s short and to the point and it even sounds like what you are describing. It’s a dick/shit/pissant what has gotten me into a snit.

So at least in my mind I have started referring to “that stupid git”, etc. Should I have any reservations about using it? Is there a sexual connotation to anyone, like wanker or bugger for Brits? Is it really a curseword/obscenity (like “dickwad”)and I don’t know it, or is it mild and not loaded, like “jerk”/“idiot”??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2006, 8:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/2 "2006-07-14T20:48:32Z")

</div>

**git**

_n_ : a person who is deemed to be despicable or contemptible; “only a rotter would do that”; “kill the rat”; “throw the bum out”; “you cowardly little pukes!”; “the British call a contemptible person a `git’” [syn: rotter, dirty dog, rat, skunk, stinker, stinkpot, bum, puke, crumb, lowlife, scum bag, so-and-so]  
Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

No sexual connotations, no loading, just a very handy little word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2006, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/3 "2006-07-14T20:54:12Z")

</div>

No, nothing sexual. As with many derogatory terms, it’s vague and depends on context. “The Old Gits” were characters from a few years ago in Harry Enfield sketches, two old men who spent their whole time finding things to complain about and being mean to each other and everyone else, and pretty much demonstrate the most typical use of the word. Think Grandpa Simpson.

It also gets used in more generalised ways. A lid that you can’t unscrew could equally be referred to as “what a bastard”, “come on, you fucker” or “you little git”. Or someone who comes out with an amusing insult might get the light-hearted response “you git”. Depending on company 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seosamh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@seosamh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/seosamh)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2006, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/4 "2006-07-14T22:38:07Z")

</div>

Another famous British Git: the character Alf Garnett in the BBC comedy “Till Death Us Do Part” (Warren Mitchell) had a lazy son-in-law from Liverpool (“Mike Rawlins”, married to Alf’s daughter, Rita) whom he habitually called an idle or randy Scouse Git (Scouse = Liverpudlian). Back in the mid-60s it was considered quite shocking to hear the word on TV.

The Monkees’ “Randy Scouse Git”, which I presume was some sort of homage to “Till Death …” was generally referred to over here as “Alternate Title” so as not to offend the kiddies.

By the way, the actor who played the son-in-law, Anthony Booth, is actually Tony Blair’s father-in-law.

I believe “All In The Family” was loosely based on “Till Death…”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2006, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/5 "2006-07-14T23:12:49Z")

</div>

I would say it means someone who is viciously, constructively stupid; a person who goes out of their way to obstruct common sense or to cause pointless inconvenience to others, of course as an insult, its usage is far broader, but whereas Doctor Evil is a generic bad guy, Mini-Me is a _git_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pjen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Pjen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pjen)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2006, 6:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/6 "2006-07-15T06:34:27Z")

</div>

IIRC it is derived from get- slang for child, with a half hidden implication that the child is unwanted- either illegitimate or subnormal. Get as begot, and begot as misbegot.

Hence implying bastard or useless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kambuckta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/53a042/32.png) [@kambuckta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kambuckta)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2006, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/7 "2006-07-15T13:00:52Z")

</div>

**Git** is to mad old bloke as **Bint** is to mad old woman in my lexicon.

It generally refers to slightly senile older people who do funny things that are not particularly offensive (otherwise they get much more derogatory labels). A ‘Git’ is a person who toddles across the busy intersection against the red light, or one who rails madly against liberals/conservatives/whacky conspiracy theories when you shout them a beer in yer’ local pub. They’re mad old gits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beware\_of\_Doug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Beware\_of\_Doug](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beware_of_Doug)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2006, 2:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/8 "2006-07-15T14:42:56Z")

</div>

[Git](http://www.pianosa.com/pic/sketches/mrmrsgit.htm) thee hence and experience the _Monty Python_ sketch about Mr. and Mrs. Git.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Celyn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9dc877/32.png) [@Celyn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Celyn)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2006, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/9 "2006-07-15T16:38:55Z")

</div>

[kb]Kabukta\*\* is no doubt right about Oz, but in Brtish usage, it seems to me that we can call anyone of whatever age “a stupid git” or “a useless git” (sometimes “get” in Scotland) and it seems to mean roughly the same as stupid/useless jerk. Funnily enough, it occurs to me that I seldom would use it without a qualifying adjective, although that might be must me, for all I know, whereas you could say that someone was a “jerk”, needing no adjective.  
Me, I’m a lazy procrastinating git, so please forgive any typos as I dash out to the world. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2006, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/10 "2006-07-17T14:31:52Z")

</div>

> [@seosamh](#):
>
> whom he habitually called an idle or randy Scouse Git (Scouse = Liverpudlian). Back in the mid-60s it was considered quite shocking to hear the word on TV.
> 
> The Monkees’ “Randy Scouse Git”, which I presume was some sort of homage to “Till Death …” was generally referred to over here as “Alternate Title” so as not to offend the kiddies.

So “git” was the part of it that was considered offensive? Maybe the way asshole and bullshit have become accepted on TV more recently…

> [@Celyn](#):
>
> it occurs to me that I seldom would use it without a qualifying adjective, although that might be must me, for all I know, whereas you could say that someone was a “jerk”, needing no adjective.

I would usually go with “stupid” in front of either one.

Thanks for the info and references, all!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheLoadedDog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/35a633/32.png) [@TheLoadedDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheLoadedDog)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2006, 10:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/11 "2006-07-18T10:17:52Z")

</div>

> [@Celyn](#):
>
> [kb]Kabukta\*\* is no doubt right about Oz, but in Brtish usage, it seems to me that we can call anyone of whatever age “a stupid git” or “a useless git” (sometimes “get” in Scotland) and it seems to mean roughly the same as stupid/useless jerk. Funnily enough, it occurs to me that I seldom would use it without a qualifying adjective, although that might be must me, for all I know, whereas you could say that someone was a “jerk”, needing no adjective.  
> Me, I’m a lazy procrastinating git, so please forgive any typos as I dash out to the world. 🙂

Naah, **kam** ’s being a git. 😃

I’ve always used it as the British do. Anybody can be a git. To me, it has a main connotation of stupidity, more than many people have been mentioning here. A git will do something stupid, but they can be a generally stupid person, or it might be a one-off display of absent-mindedness. Git-like examples of stupid behaviour can be endearlingly stupid or annoyingly stupid, but never _extremely_ stupid. I don’t think you could call Dubya a git for his foreign policy because that’s too serious, but you could call him a git for leaving the microphone on. The guy that stalls his car in front of you at the lights is a “stupid bloody git”, as is the bloke who base-jumps off skyscrapers. A guy who cuts somebody off in traffic is a git, but only if he does it to somebody else. If he does it to you, he’s an arsehole, not a git.

**Kambuckta** ’s example is correct though, but only as a specific _type_ of git.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jabiru](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/bbce88/32.png) [@jabiru](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jabiru)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2006, 10:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/12 "2006-07-18T10:44:44Z")

</div>

> [@gigi](#):
>
> So “git” was the part of it that was considered offensive? Maybe the way asshole and bullshit have become accepted on TV more recently…

I always thought it was _randy_ which was causing the offence. Randy = libidinous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pushkin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ee59a6/32.png) [@Pushkin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pushkin)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2006, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/13 "2006-07-18T13:05:50Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> I would say it means someone who is viciously, constructively stupid; a person who goes out of their way to obstruct common sense or to cause pointless inconvenience to others, of course as an insult, its usage is far broader, but whereas Doctor Evil is a generic bad guy, Mini-Me is a _git_.

Agreed, forget Grampa Simpson, a git is never meant in a soft or friendly way like, perhaps, “daft bugger.”

Its meant as an indication of malevolence beyond what is necessary or a lack of skills and/or knowledge that someone should have for their sake and others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DooWahDiddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e9bcb4/32.png) [@DooWahDiddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DooWahDiddy)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2006, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/14 "2006-07-18T13:25:02Z")

</div>

And let’s not forget the Beatles called Sir Walter Raleigh “such a stupid git” in “I’m So Tired”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2006, 1:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/15 "2006-07-18T13:43:58Z")

</div>

> [@Pushkin](#):
>
> Agreed, forget Grampa Simpson, a git is never meant in a soft or friendly way like, perhaps, “daft bugger.”
> 
> Its meant as an indication of malevolence beyond what is necessary or a lack of skills and/or knowledge that someone should have for their sake and others.

So I am assuming someone who acts stupid in traffic would qualify?? That seems to be when I wield the term most often.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pushkin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ee59a6/32.png) [@Pushkin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pushkin)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2006, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/please-tell-me-about-git-noun/364534/16 "2006-07-18T13:54:45Z")

</div>

> [@gigi](#):
>
> So I am assuming someone who acts stupid in traffic would qualify?? That seems to be when I wield the term most often.

Indeed, someone who should know better for their own sake and everyone elses, but blithely goes ahead knowing the chaos they’re causing.
