# Points/Yards Per Game vs. Per Possession

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177
**Category:** The Game Room
**Created:** [January 8, 2010, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177 "2010-01-08T17:06:05Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)
#### Post date: [January 8, 2010, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177/1 "2010-01-08T17:06:05Z")

</div>

ISTM that the first of these are much less relevant stats, as they are heavily influenced by the clock. The second are what counts - how your offense/defense directly stacks up against the opponents defense/offence.

But there is a lot of focus on the first of these and I never hear the second mentioned.

[In light of the above, I think the Jets, for example, have an overrated defense, since their offense focuses heavily on the run, and they likely defend far fewer possessions than many other teams.]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Munch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/munch/32/5281_2.png) [@Munch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Munch)
#### Post date: [January 8, 2010, 5:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177/2 "2010-01-08T17:42:35Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> [In light of the above, I think the Jets, for example, have an overrated defense, since their offense focuses heavily on the run, and they likely defend far fewer possessions than many other teams.]

“Likely”? If you think that Pts/Possession is a better indicator, and that Pts/Gm is terrible, then run the numbers and report back.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)
#### Post date: [March 23, 2011, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177/3 "2011-03-23T21:41:37Z")

</div>

[Here’s](http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/sports/ncaabasketball/24ncaa.html?hpw=&pagewanted=all) a story about a guy who ran the numbers, but for basketball possessions, not football. Same issue, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2011, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177/4 "2011-03-24T13:50:34Z")

</div>

Football and Basketball share a similarity in that the team on offense has a variety of strategies to choose from that can affect the pace of the game, and there are relatively few turnovers. I agree wholeheartedly that points per possession is a far more useful indicator of offensive/defensive prowess than points or yards or FG%.

I don’t know if it’s compiled anywhere for Football, but for Basketball you can go [here](http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2011.html) and look under Miscellaneous Statistics, called Offensive Rating and Defensive Rating, which is points per 100 possessions. However, they call it an estimate, perhaps there isn’t a strict accounting of # of possessions?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![markdash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@markdash](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markdash)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2011, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177/5 "2011-03-24T15:29:13Z")

</div>

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> Football and Basketball share a similarity in that the team on offense has a variety of strategies to choose from that can affect the pace of the game, and there are relatively few turnovers. I agree wholeheartedly that points per possession is a far more useful indicator of offensive/defensive prowess than points or yards or FG%.
> 
> I don’t know if it’s compiled anywhere for Football, but for Basketball you can go [here](http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2011.html) and look under Miscellaneous Statistics, called Offensive Rating and Defensive Rating, which is points per 100 possessions. However, they call it an estimate, perhaps there isn’t a strict accounting of # of possessions?

I believe the issue is free throws. Without knowing exactly what led to all of a team’s free throws (defensive 3 seconds, technical fouls, and-1 fouls, and just plain 2 shot fouls), you have to estimate how much a free throw is “worth” in terms of possessions. Most estimates are that a free throw is worth 0.44 possessions, AFAIK.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![VarlosZ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/d78d45/32.png) [@VarlosZ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VarlosZ)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2011, 4:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/points-yards-per-game-vs-per-possession/524177/6 "2011-03-24T16:37:36Z")

</div>

[Drive stats](http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/drivestats) for the NFL. Yes, more useful than per-game numbers, but generally less useful than [DVOA](http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teameff).
