# Police response during mass shooting event {Not Gun Control, 2nd Amendment or Politics}

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [May 26, 2022, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165 "2022-05-26T18:28:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mighty\_Mouse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mighty_mouse/32/7776_2.png) [@Mighty\_Mouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mighty_Mouse)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/461 "2022-05-30T16:00:10Z")

</div>

I’m starting to wonder if the police lined up nineteen kids and two teachers and gunned them down, what some people here would be saying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/462 "2022-05-30T16:01:32Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Librarian](#):
>
> Those guys are uncharacteristically fast in condemning their colleagues.

Incidentally, I can think of another explanation for this one …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/463 "2022-05-30T16:08:14Z")

</div>

> [@Mighty\_Mouse](#):
>
> I’m starting to wonder if the police lined up nineteen kids and two teachers and gunned them down, what some people here would be saying.

I think I already covered this. They would be exonerated for taking reasonable measures to protect themselves from cootie exposure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![China\_Guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@China\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/China_Guy)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/464 "2022-05-30T16:09:18Z")

</div>

@The_Librarian Suggest you read the NY Times op-ed: [I Created the F.B.I.’s Active Shooter Program. The Officers in Uvalde Did Not Follow Their Training](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/30/opinion/uvalde-school-shooting.html). I believe I can directly quote the following under fair use:

**The day after the F.B.I. released its latest active shooter figures, Robb Elementary School was attacked. In the past two years, the Uvalde school district has hosted at least two active shooter trainings, according to [reporting](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/26/us/mass-shooting-school-security.html) by The Times. One of them was two months ago. Current protocol and best practices say officers must persistently pursue efforts to neutralize a shooter when a shooting is underway. This is true even if only one officer is present. This is without question the right approach.**

**We need to understand why that protocol was not followed in Uvalde. I am still confident the F.B.I.’s focus on training to this standard was right, but I’m less confident in its execution. The officers who responded may have been unprepared for conflict, which can lead to fatal results. Law enforcement officers need to be mentally prepared before they arrive on the scene, so they can respond immediately.**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/465 "2022-05-30T16:14:34Z")

</div>

Just piggybacking on this … though I believe this has already been covered:

> [@](#):
>
> ### Training manual: Officer’s first priority is to ‘confront attacker’
> 
> Guidelines on handling active shooter situations in the state’s commission on law enforcement training manual that was obtained by CNN say an “officer’s first priority is to move in and confront the attacker.”
> 
> The 2020 manual says carrying out that first priority and confronting the shooter “may include bypassing the injured and not responding to cries for help from children.”
> 
> “As first responders we must recognize that innocent life must be defended,” it says. “A first responder unwilling to place the lives of the innocent above their own safety should consider another career field.”
> 
> All law enforcement officers in Texas are trained on those guidelines.

[**SOURCE**](https://www.cbs58.com/news/somebody-was-wrong-texas-shooting-victims-father-demands-accountability-over-police-delays-at-school)

There really isn’t a lot of grey area here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Librarian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_librarian/32/402_2.png) [@The\_Librarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Librarian)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/466 "2022-05-30T16:23:01Z")

</div>

While I acknowledge that it really doesn’t look good, I keep wondering how much of this training is in breaching doors or windows.

All the links you gave me do not mention anything about that.

Is it reasonable to assume that the first people on the scene were trained with, equipped with the tools to get past those doors/through the window?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/467 "2022-05-30T16:25:43Z")

</div>

Can we all agree that since cops never execute “no knock warrants” there’s no reasonable expectation that they are trained in door and window breaching?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/468 "2022-05-30T16:26:23Z")

</div>

> [@Crane](#):
>
> If they had taken action they would be criticized with lots of second guessing.

I know this wasn’t the main thrust of your comment, but I don’t think it’s true. In situations where first responders have entered a horrific scene and done their best to engage an active shooter, putting themselves in harms way without adequate backup, I really can’t recall a lot of second guessing if the outcome isn’t ideal. I guess the exception might be if the first responder accidentally harms someone innocent. But given the degree of criticism of law enforcement in general, this seems notable to me as a situation where nobody usually has anything bad to say, and there is nothing but respect for their bravery.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/469 "2022-05-30T16:26:28Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Librarian](#):
>
> Is it reasonable to assume that the first people on the scene were trained with, equipped with the tools to get past those doors/through the window?

IIRC, I addressed this exact question (of yours) in post #459.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/470 "2022-05-30T16:26:50Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> Just a couple of months ago, the Uvalde CISD police department [held active shooter training](https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid02AYRqQRcMKWGb8BgqpVLV2DsR9rJLjSYjf4FzqV5k8pqTPYZNHFUrTgDT6cfHyNMvl&id=316657282269575), with the training led by three members of that force. I assume they had some input into the training they offered their colleagues.

What did the training consist of?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/471 "2022-05-30T16:28:57Z")

</div>

I have no idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Librarian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_librarian/32/402_2.png) [@The\_Librarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Librarian)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/472 "2022-05-30T16:30:02Z")

</div>

I fail(ed) to get your point.

Did the room(s) have other point of entry? Is the school building actually a tent?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/473 "2022-05-30T16:30:11Z")

</div>

My cite in post #465 gives us some important visibility into the strategy if not the individual tactics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/474 "2022-05-30T16:31:04Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Librarian](#):
>
> I fail(ed) to get your point.

If these officers were/are not trained to breach a locked door, that is another problem, not an excuse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Librarian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_librarian/32/402_2.png) [@The\_Librarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Librarian)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/475 "2022-05-30T16:32:05Z")

</div>

Please just link to the post. In my interface the post’ number is not easily found.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/476 "2022-05-30T16:32:47Z")

</div>

Try SHIFT-3, and then enter the post number.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mordecaiB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mordecaib/32/7725_2.png) [@mordecaiB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mordecaiB)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/477 "2022-05-30T16:45:32Z")

</div>

> [@elbows](#):
>
> I can’t make the link work, do a search for Angeli Gomez, you’ll find the photo and the story.

Thanks, first time I saw that. I wonder how she managed to get in the school? I was thinking windows but the article says she was actually inside the school.

> [@Railer13](#):
>
> Not to be snarky, but how else do mass shootings end? Unless the shooter kills himself before the cops arrive, he kills himself when confronted by the cops, gets shot by police, or is taken into custody

Yes, the arrival of police who take action ends the shooting in one way or another and allows medical care to begin. Standing outside doing nothing allowed the shooter to directly kill one student he found with a phone and allowed who knows how many to bleed out. Clearly the police engaging is the superior of the two options.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> We know what the failure point was. Next time, there will be different people in the places in the plan, but that won’t change the failure point, because the failure point is human nature.

This is not true, this plan has worked many times over and is the best plan anyone has come up with. If not for the teacher who let the shooter into the building and the cop turned politician who didn’t follow his own safety doctrine, this wouldn’t have been such a clusterfuck.

Thinking there is a plan that doesn’t involve humans in it at some point is bananas. Humans make and execute the plans. Unless your referring to things that are out of bounds for talking about in this thread, there is no way to take humans out of this equation.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Insisting it’s a good plan because it worked once it was followed has a very “First, assume the cow is a sphere” vibe.

It’s worked many times, and no, it’s nothing like that.

> [@The\_Librarian](#):
>
> 40 mins really isn’t very long to determine and execute an appropriate response in a dangerous situation.

Yes it is a really long time. They already had plans and doctrines on how to handle an active shooter. They had just had an active shooter drill two months ago, with “bodies” and everything. Active shooter protocols are probably one of the few things that every LEO branch across the country has the same rule: Immediately remove the shooter, even if you have to step over wounded to do it.

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> The fly in the ointment would be the use of students as a shield by the shooter.

How would he do this? All the students were laying on bunches on the ground along with their dead and wounded classmates, not randomly walking around the room. Not to mention that elementary students make lousy shields for an adult who police are firing at with rifles from 30 feet away.

> [@crowmanyclouds](#):
>
> You could just wait until he runs out of child shields and then the ointment is flyless!

Man, why didn’t I think of that? Now that’s a well thought out plan, and it would work every single time! 👍🏽

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/478 "2022-05-30T16:46:33Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Librarian](#):
>
> Please just link to the post. In my interface the post’ number is not easily found.

You seem to be expressing strong opinions without knowing a lot of factual information that has been discussed at some length in the thread. I’d recommend reading the thread at least from the point where @DavidNRockies posted clear photos of the windows, which is easy to find:

[Police response during mass shooting event {Not Gun Control, 2nd Amendment or Politics} - #365 by DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/365)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/479 "2022-05-30T16:54:21Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Librarian](#):
>
> You get called to an “active shooter situation”.  
> You do exactly as you were trained to do: rush in towards the sound of gunfire.  
> You find yourself at a locked door, finding out it was locked gets you(r colleague) shot.
> 
> And now you don’t get a few minutes to figure out what to do?

That’s exactly the situation where you don’t take a few minutes to figure out what to do.

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> I expect the story to change several times along the way, perhaps the media should have waited to report unverified stories.

When the media has incomplete information, that’s one thing. When the incorrect information is coming from the police department themselves, that’s another thing entirely. The statement by the police is the verification the media, and we, should be waiting for, and when it’s wrong, it makes it much harder to get the truth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mighty\_Mouse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mighty_mouse/32/7776_2.png) [@Mighty\_Mouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mighty_Mouse)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165/480 "2022-05-30T16:57:12Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> When the media has incomplete information, that’s one thing. When the incorrect information is coming from the police department themselves, that’s another thing entirely. The statement by the police is the verification the media, and we, should be waiting for, and when it’s wrong, it makes it much harder to get the truth.

You need to wait for them to get their stories straight. In this case somehow the shit flowing downhill overwhelmed LE’s blue wall.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165.md?page=23)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/police-response-during-mass-shooting-event-not-gun-control-2nd-amendment-or-politics/965165.md?page=25)
