Maybe this is a law-talkin’ thing, but how the actual fuck do you “withdraw” a warrant that’s already been executed? That’s like unshooting a murder victim.
There was never going to be a prosecution. This was entirely about trashing the business and information technology assets of a political troublemaker. And after that, “shucks, didn’t mean to do that” is entirely irrelevant.
I’m not a law-talkin’ guy, but my assumption was that withdrawing the warrant means anything they seized during the search is inadmissible as evidence in a trial.
But you’re right, if the point of the raid was just to intimidate the newspaper and there was never going to be a trial, then whether or not any “evidence” is admissible in court is moot.
Right, plus the article states that they must return all seized assets to the newspaper.
In a related twist, it appears that the Magistrate who approved the warrant has a bit of a checkered past herself.
This article certainly does not speak well of the Kansas judicial system. Many of those judges appear to have attended the same judge-training academy as Aileen Cannon.
I heard earlier today that this newspaper has had 3,000 new subscribers since all of this happened, most of them not local, and a surprising number from outside the U.S.
Who knows what they did with it or what they installed on it while they had it. Even if it’s all in perfect working order, a wipe and reinstall would be prudent.