# Poll: How many Dopers believe President Trump is an illegitimate President?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [January 20, 2017, 5:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644 "2017-01-20T17:42:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dallas\_Jones](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dallas_jones/32/3277_2.png) [@Dallas\_Jones](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dallas_Jones)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 12:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/41 "2017-01-21T00:26:30Z")

</div>

He is legitimately elected as President.

The failure of the opposing party lies directly upon the shoulders of Hillary. Years of preparation for this election, tons of money for the campaign, A worshiping idolization from most media.

It was her election to lose and she did it well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astorian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@astorian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astorian)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/42 "2017-01-21T00:30:28Z")

</div>

He is both an asshole and a legitimate President.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![River\_Hippie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/river_hippie/32/26_2.png) [@River\_Hippie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/River_Hippie)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/43 "2017-01-21T00:37:02Z")

</div>

He is both an asshole and seems at this point to be the legitimate President. Need more info.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/44 "2017-01-21T01:15:40Z")

</div>

> [@aldiboronti](#):
>
> Here’s an idea. Start your own thread or threads asking the question using other definitions rather than trying to shoehorn your own in to this one.
> 
> Suggestion offered in the spirit of bipartisanship.

Terrible suggestion, my bipartisan friend. It’s the IE in your OP that made my suggestion necessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ukulele\_Ike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/df788c/32.png) [@Ukulele\_Ike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ukulele_Ike)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 2:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/45 "2017-01-21T02:34:49Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> …you will be surprised and delighted to learn that words have many different meanings. I direct your attention especially to definitions 3 and 4b.

Lewis MAY have meant that Trump’s daddy never married that lady orangutan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boffking](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/858c86/32.png) [@boffking](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/boffking)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 2:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/46 "2017-01-21T02:58:21Z")

</div>

> [@ultimate11](#):
>
> He won and it’s over. The data is there. The electors have spoken. He may have not won the popular vote, but then again, so did George W. Bush, and nobody was complaining about those results.
> 
> Illegitimate President? I think not.

Plenty of people are **still complaining** about those results to this day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wesley\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wesley_clark/32/20581_2.png) [@Wesley\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wesley_Clark)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 3:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/47 "2017-01-21T03:18:55Z")

</div>

Unless you can prove that Russia hacked ballot results and gave him a false victory, he is a legitimate president.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sterling\_Archer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Sterling\_Archer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sterling_Archer)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 3:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/48 "2017-01-21T03:52:05Z")

</div>

Legitimate. Idiotic, but legitimate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aldiboronti](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@aldiboronti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aldiboronti)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 4:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/49 "2017-01-21T04:00:22Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Terrible suggestion, my bipartisan friend. It’s the IE in your OP that made my suggestion necessary.

You miss the point rather spectacularly. The ie, as I have already stated, clarified the definition which I chose to use. If you prefer another one then you know how to start another thread. Continuing to insist on other definitions in this thread is completely besides the point. Others in their replies may use other definitions, that is their privilege. It is not your privilege to insist that I cannot use the definition that I chose.

I do hope you understand now, it’s rather laborsome to have to continually explain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aquadementia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aquadementia/32/555_2.png) [@Aquadementia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aquadementia)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 4:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/50 "2017-01-21T04:57:10Z")

</div>

Not illegitimate, just an inexplicably bad choice like if half the voters showed up at the polls with a fauxhawk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/51 "2017-01-21T06:53:56Z")

</div>

> [@Sage\_Rat](#):
>
> Not necessarily the best example, but let’s say that a man is arrested for a heinous and gruesome murder. He’s legally charged, legally prosecuted, legally declared guilty by a randomly selected group of his peers, and legally jailed. Eventually, he is legally executed by the state.
> 
> But the reality is that someone else was guilty of the crime.
> 
> Was the man legally executed of the crime? Yes.  
> Was this execution based on the correct premises? No. The process failed. If the process had worked as intended, the correct person would have been executed.
> 
> “Legitimacy” isn’t really the correct word for this situation, hence why I said it could be “argued”. You would have to stretch the definition of the word a bit. But certainly, it’s reasonable to say that if it had really been an election by and for the American people - which is the intent - the result could have been different.

Except in this case we know why the guy said Trump was not legitimate (Russian hacking of e-mails), and that does not cause the election to be “not legitimate”. Not to mention we have no way of knowing what might have happened in some alternate universe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 7:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/52 "2017-01-21T07:28:05Z")

</div>

Electoral shenanigans are as American as apple pie. The elections of Adams-6 in 1824 and Hayes in 1876 went against popular vote winners and left bitterness. JFK in 1960 probably cheated in both Illinois and Texas; Nixon might have been the proper winner. But Nixon returned the favor in 1968 with treason: he scuttled the Vietnam peace talks to prevent Humphrey victory. In 1972 he directed criminal activity against the Democrats — is that considered an “illegitimate victory” if he would have won in a landslide anyway?

[There is strong evidence that the Bush-Reagan team made a deal with Iran to help defeat Jimmy Carter in 1980](http://www.wrmea.org/1987-october/did-iran-delay-hostages-release-to-ensure-reagan-s-election.html); this allegation is supported by then-Iranian President Abulhassan Bani Sadr, National Security Council member Gary Sick, and former Reagan/Bush campaign staffer and White House analyst Barbara Honegger.

The infamous “butterfly ballot” cost Gore the election of 2000. Is proof of GOP malice required to use this to declare that election “illegitimate”? Lies against Kerry were needed for Bush re-election in 2004. Does that make the election “illegitimate”? Or are lies just part of the game? Shifting the blame for Cheney’s lies to Valerie Plame and a N.Y. Times reporter, and shifting the blame for Bush’s malingering to Dan Rather were certainly despicable. Is this illegitimacy? Or American politics at its rough-and-tumble finest?

The 2016 elections in Rust Belt states were so close that GOP voter suppression efforts probably made the difference. But no GOP officials, nor the GOP lawyers who lied in front of federal judges, have gone to prison. So voter suppression is “legitimate”?

I didn’t click any poll option. I need the terms defined better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/53 "2017-01-21T12:53:34Z")

</div>

> [@aldiboronti](#):
>
> How many on the board believe, as John Lewis, that President Trump is an illegitimate President, ie that Trump is in illegal occuation of the White House?

I’m curious as to why you believe that that is what Lewis meant.

Because I both agree with Lewis (or at least I agree with what I understood Lewis to be saying), and I believe that Trump is legally the President of the United States.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/54 "2017-01-21T13:25:34Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> JFK in 1960 probably cheated in both Illinois and Texas; Nixon might have been the proper winner.

AFAICT, the evidence of this is as thin as the ‘evidence’ (never been able to find more than handwaving here) that Bush won in 2004 by stealing Ohio from Kerry.

> [@](#):
>
> The infamous “butterfly ballot” cost Gore the election of 2000. Is proof of GOP malice required to use this to declare that election “illegitimate”?

No, but the various GOP efforts to delay, obstruct, and prevent a legitimate recount - most notably the ‘[Brooks Brothers Riot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_Brothers_riot)’ that interrupted the recount in Miami-Dade County, which was instigated by a bunch of GOP operatives (including Trump advisor Roger Stone) who were flown in from D.C. to disrupt the hand recount.

> [@](#):
>
> So voter suppression is “legitimate”?

In the sense of throwing up legal and/or bureaucratic obstacles to make it more difficult for U.S. citizens to register and vote: no, absolutely not. It makes a travesty of democracy. The fact that America has accepted as legitimate the results of a number of elections now where such suppression was a factor doesn’t change that in the least, IMHO.

I’d agree that the scuttling of peace/hostage release talks by the GOP candidates in 1968 and 1980 were well beyond what can be considered part of the normal political rough-and-tumble. I’m not sure I’d call either of these moves treasonous, but for persons outside the Executive Branch to interfere with foreign policy to tip an election certainly calls into question the legitimacy of the outcome.

Excepting Bush 41 (a pretty marginal exception as he was really Reagan’s third term), the last Republican President who didn’t win their initial election in a questionable way was Eisenhower. Nixon, Reagan, Shrub, and now Trump have all won by dubious means.

Lies, OTOH, are part of the political rough-and-tumble. The Swift Boat stuff probably cost Kerry the 2004 election, but he was the one who let it linger for days with the notion that the best response was regarding it as beneath a response. Boy howdy, was he ever wrong about that - and he should have known it. That’s why Clinton had his ‘quick response team’ all the way back in 1992: once the lies go unrebutted for awhile, they’re nearly impossible to dislodge from the public mind.

And of course Nixon would have won easily in 1972, absent his dirty-tricks operation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/55 "2017-01-21T15:25:18Z")

</div>

> [@aldiboronti](#):
>
> You miss the point rather spectacularly. The ie, as I have already stated, clarified the definition which I chose to use.

Who, pardon my French, gives a wet shit which definition you chose to use? It’s John Lewis who used the word, not you–unless you also think Trump is illegitimate.

Your “IE” pretty explicitly declared that you believed that was the definition Lewis was using. If you didn’t mean that, you shouldn’t have referenced him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bosda_di_chi_of_tricor/32/16845_2.png) [@Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/56 "2017-01-21T16:10:07Z")

</div>

Russian spy.

Maybe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/57 "2017-01-21T16:14:14Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> He had help from the KGB, the KKK, and the FBI. Plus the “liberal media” spent more time on Hillary’s email than on all other issues combined. Add to that some missing votes in Detroit, voter disenfranchising elsewhere and it’s clear that his “victory” was quite tainted. Perhaps not as tainted and illegitimate as Reagan, Nixon, and the Bushes but definitely not 100% legitimate.

See, I no longer even understand what the hell you mean by “legitimate.” Reagan won in landslides. There is absolutely no question whatsoever the American people preferred Reagan over his opponents. What was illegitimate about it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e47c2d/32.png) [@Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffy_the_Elephant_Shrew)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/58 "2017-01-21T17:01:23Z")

</div>

I don’t know if he’s illegitimate, but he sure is a bastard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/59 "2017-01-21T17:35:09Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> You think deliberately undermining the Iranian hostage negotiations was all peachy-keen?

That idiotic conspiracy theory you’re referring to was discredited decades ago by that right-wing pro-Reagan rag The Village Voice.

What’s next, are we going to hear about JFK getting assassinated by the CIA?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Corry\_El](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecae2f/32.png) [@Corry\_El](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Corry_El)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2017, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644/60 "2017-01-21T18:30:37Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> It wouldn’t matter if everything in the voting was on the up and up. He has repeatedly demonstrated his inability to do the job,

Maybe just inapt turn of phrase, but it absolutely matters whether or not the voting was on the up and up, no matter what you think of the candidate’s ability to do the job, different issue.

And ‘if’? There’s zero evidence the _voting_ was anything other than ‘up and up’\*. The question is about information available to the public. There’s always false information available, so that IMO can never be used to say an election outcome was illegitimate unless the government uses its monopoly on force to prevent the reporting of countervailing true information.

The question is whether the release of true information can be deemed to make the outcome illegitimate because selective leaking of it was so biased, or if one believes release by a foreign entity is so categorically different from a biased leak by a domestic entity. For that I’d say possibly, but the bar to deem the outcome illegitimate as a result would be way above what happened in this election.

\*which doesn’t mean absolute 100% freedom from errors or fraud in favor of any candidate, but lack of evidence of any significant effect, no such evidence here.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/poll-how-many-dopers-believe-president-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/777644.md?page=4)
