# Polling is broken, right? Or is it the news? Or all of the US?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Tags:** trump\
**Created:** [November 27, 2023, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779 "2023-11-27T17:30:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2024, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/282 "2024-05-15T20:58:56Z")

</div>

Another big polling miss - at least 15% or so:

> <https://twitter.com/jamiedupree/status/1790693532027466185?t=wAVaQC_9rMTOMTOdNcJTjA&s=19>

This was a Democratic party primary, but there have also been a lot of big misses in general election polling recently, consistently underestimating Democratic support.

I continue to suspect that there is some segment of Democratic voters that polling is largely failing to capture - my hypothesis has been young, very progressive, and very internet savvy voters, that I dub “Swifties”, are particularly adept at avoiding pollsters, whether by phone or online, and are consistently under weighted in polling. I wonder if we could look at the details of the above primary - perhaps Alsobrooks (the winner) had the lion’s share of the Swifties, and that’s why she was consistently underestimated?

If I’m correct, then if Biden gets the Swifties, he’s likely to over perform the polls.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2024, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/283 "2024-05-15T20:59:25Z")

</div>

This isn’t a polling issue per se, but given the severity of the consequences of Trump winning, polling has to kind of take that into account. A doctor telling you that there’s a 50% chance of you having the flu is drastically different than a doctor telling you that you have a 50% chance of having pancreatic cancer, even if the percentage is the same.

In other words, a 4% Biden lead in the polls over Trump has to be considered a lot less reassuring than, say, a 4% Biden lead over Romney or a normal Republican.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2024, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/284 "2024-05-15T21:00:19Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> polling is largely failing to capture - my hypothesis has been young, very progressive, and very internet savvy voters, that I dub “Swifties”, are particularly adept at avoiding pollsters, whether by phone or online, and are consistently under weighted in polling. I wonder if we could look at the details of the above primary - perhaps Alsobrooks (the winner) had the lion’s share of the Swifties, and that’s why she was consistently underestimated?

But what motive would pollsters have to avoid Swifties and what motive would Swifties have to avoid being polled?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2024, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/285 "2024-05-15T21:04:10Z")

</div>

It’s not about motive for pollsters - they’re just having a harder time getting the Swifties (if my hypothesis is correct). The Swifties use cell phones, and are more adept at avoiding callers they don’t want to talk to, and avoiding online solicitations they’re not interested in. They have other things they want to do with their phones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2024, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/286 "2024-05-15T21:37:22Z")

</div>

Simon again – **[new article today](https://www.hopiumchronicles.com/p/alsobrooks-rocks-it-good-inflation)**:

> [The New York Times] [released a **second** national poll _(! -b)_](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/05/14/upshot/support-third-party-candidates.html) conducted with a different pollster, Ipsos. This poll did not find the kind of structural weakness for Biden their big Monday poll did. In this poll Biden leads 45.5% to 42.5% (+3) in their initial head to heads between the two candidates.
> 
> To understand what an outlier Monday’s NYT battleground states poll was let’s look at the other national and state polls [released in recent days](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/)(Biden-Trump):
> 
> - NPR/Marist 51%-46% (+5) likely voters
> - ABC News 49%-45% (+4) likely voters
> - NYT/Ipsos 45.5%-42.5% (+3)
> - RMG 44%-42% (+2) likely voters
> - TIPP 42%-40% (+2)
> - Big Village 42%-41% (+1) likely voters
> - Data For Progress 47%-46% (+1)
> - Economist/YouGov 43%-43% (tied)
> - Yahoo/YouGov 45%-45% (tied)
> - USA/Suffolk 37%-37% (tied)
> - Morning Consult 43%-44% (-1) and 43%-43% (tied)
> - Quinnipiac Wisconsin 50%-44% (+6)
> - Orbital Digital Arizona 39%-38% (+1)
> - CBS News MI 51%-49% PA 49%-50% WI 49%-50%
> 
> 12 national polls. Biden leads in 7, 4 are tied, Trump leads in 1. State polls by serious credible pollsters showing Biden in far better shape than the NYT polls. All of these polls, with the exception of Data For Progress are independent polls, not controlled or paid for left of center organizations. I include DfP because historically their polling has not been favorable to Democrats.
> 
> Part of the reason I got the 2022 election right when so many got it wrong was that I broke out independent polls like these from polling averages which had been influenced by a flood of Republican aligned polls. These Republican funded polls often produced results 3-4 more points more Republican than independent polling. I think we are starting to see something similar happen in this election, with most independent polls finding a close competitive election, perhaps one now where we have a slight advantage; and R funded polling (and NYT/Siena) finding it much more Republican. It’s clear Trump and Republicans think they are seeing a new red wave, and that they lead. I don’t think it’s a fair read of the data, just as I didn’t think the red wave was a fair read of the data in 2022.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2024, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/287 "2024-05-15T22:05:06Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I continue to suspect that there is some segment of Democratic voters that polling is largely failing to capture - my hypothesis has been young, very progressive, and very internet savvy voters, that I dub “Swifties”, are particularly adept at avoiding pollsters, whether by phone or online, and are consistently under weighted in polling.

_From Swiftboating to Swifties: Presidential Politics in the Early 2000s_

(Write that book!)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chappachula](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d2c977/32.png) [@chappachula](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chappachula)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 6:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/288 "2024-05-16T06:49:49Z")

</div>

> [@bordelond](#):
>
> independent polls, not controlled or paid for left of center organizations.
> 
> a flood of Republican aligned polls.These Republican funded polls often produced results 3-4 more points more Republican than independent polling.

What are “republican aligned polls” and polls “controlled by left of center organizations”?  
How do their methods differ from " normal" polls?

I can see why they mighr choose to publicize or not publicize certain results of their polls. But how does their methodology differ, so that it consistently creates the results which they prefer?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.winston_oboogie/32/2945_2.png) [@Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Winston_OBoogie)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 1:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/289 "2024-05-16T13:32:02Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I continue to suspect that there is some segment of Democratic voters that polling is largely failing to capture - my hypothesis has been young, very progressive, and very internet savvy voters, that I dub “Swifties”, are particularly adept at avoiding pollsters, whether by phone or online, and are consistently under weighted in polling.

I think this needs to be generalized. Yes, the pollsters are missing your “swifties”, but who’s to say that there aren’t a large number of young, conservative, internet savvy voters (in my mind, modern yuppies) who are adept at avoiding pollsters.

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> But what motive would pollsters have to avoid Swifties and what motive would Swifties have to avoid being polled?

Lord knows that the pollsters aren’t intentionally missing the “swifties”; the swifties might not be avoiding the polls _intentionally_, it’s just a side effect of their lifestyle - the polls just need to find them.

Society has changed; the polls are changing, but probably not fast enough. As we (in general) change our habits, I have faith in the long run that the statisticians will find the correct mix; probably just in time for society to change again.

> [@chappachula](#):
>
> What are “republican aligned polls” and polls “controlled by left of center organizations”?  
> How do their methods differ from " normal" polls?

Biased polls. If you see a poll where the first question is “Do you approve of Biden’s open border policy for illegal aliens?” it’s probably a “republican aligned” poll. The questions are skewed to elicit a certain response. Many of them are much more blatant that that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 1:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/290 "2024-05-16T13:35:27Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](#):
>
> I think this needs to be generalized. Yes, the pollsters are missing your “swifties”, but who’s to say that there aren’t a large number of young, conservative, internet savvy voters (in my mind, modern yuppies) who are adept at avoiding pollsters.

This is possible too, though ISTM that younger and tech savvier people are overwhelmingly progressive, but I don’t have any data at my fingertips to support this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawkeyeop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/958977/32.png) [@Hawkeyeop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hawkeyeop)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/291 "2024-05-16T14:25:22Z")

</div>

Lots of segments of people are unlikely to participate in polling. Pollsters aren’t stupid though and I’m not sure why so many people here think otherwise. At least the good ones understand that there are groups that they will get a limited sample of and take steps to give them proper sampling.

Polling isn’t perfect, and individual polls have limited value, but the aggregate polling figures are the best evidence we have of the state of the elections. Certainly way more accurate than TV pundits or esoteric message boards. Even in the age of ubiquitous cell phones, there is no evidence that polling is getting less accurate. There also isn’t one side that the data routinely over or under counts. Often a pollster will correct for errors from prior elections and the new error will be based on if they over or under corrected.

If I’m the Democratic I trust the polling is more or less accurate and stop trying to live in denial and stop blaming the media for delivering news I don’t like. This is absolutely a winnable election, but the polling is showing real problems for Democrats with minorities and the youth and courting those groups needs to be a primary focus.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/292 "2024-05-16T14:26:16Z")

</div>

> [@Hawkeyeop](#):
>
> If I’m the Democratic I trust the polling is more or less accurate and stop trying to live in denial and stop blaming the media for delivering news I don’t like. This is absolutely a winnable election, but the polling is showing real problems for Democrats with minorities and the youth and courting those groups needs to be a primary focus.

You might be right, but in recent elections the polling has been way off, mostly underestimating Democratic support.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jas09](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d07c76/32.png) [@Jas09](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jas09)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 2:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/293 "2024-05-16T14:37:26Z")

</div>

To expand on this a little bit, here were the various polls for the MD Democratic primary race: [2024 Maryland Senate - Democratic Primary | RealClearPolling](https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/senate/democratic-primary/2024/maryland)

You can see that it is correct to say that the average had Trone ahead, but there weren’t really enough polls to state a good average. And the latest poll had Alsobrooks ahead by 3. I would argue that the earliest polls are pretty useless due to the high number of undecided voters.

The only one that was way off was the Baltimore Sun poll from early April that had Trone up 12. That seems to be an outlier. It was done by an outfit called OpinionWorks that I’ve personally never heard of. It has a terrible [rating](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/) from 538 (1.8 stars).

So the rule of thumb remains: take an average of lots of reputable polls, and accept that there may be a swing in either direction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawkeyeop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/958977/32.png) [@Hawkeyeop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hawkeyeop)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 2:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/294 "2024-05-16T14:45:00Z")

</div>

Again you have to look at things in the aggregate. The fact that their are some elections that were off one way, does not mean that either polling has become more inaccurate or that their is a bias in a certain direction. You don’t have to go back very far to see elections undercounting republicans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/295 "2024-05-16T14:47:37Z")

</div>

Yes, you might be right. Or you might be wrong. We’ll see.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawkeyeop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/958977/32.png) [@Hawkeyeop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hawkeyeop)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/296 "2024-05-16T14:54:15Z")

</div>

Definitely one of those two options. For the record, I hope I’m wrong, and the polling is failing to capture a surge of youthful Democrats.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2024, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/297 "2024-05-16T16:53:02Z")

</div>

> [@chappachula](#):
>
> What are “republican aligned polls” and polls “controlled by left of center organizations”? **How do their methods differ from " normal" polls?**
> 
> I can see why they might choose to publicize or not publicize certain results of their polls. **But how does their methodology differ, so that it consistently creates the results which they prefer?**

Besides the question-rigging @ [Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Winston_OBoogie) mentions, a pollster can simply apply an intentional oversample or undersample.

**[I posted one example of a sampling on Tuesday](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/277)** – the **[May 11 NYT/Siena poll](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/05/13/us/elections/times-siena-poll-registered-voter-crosstabs.html#:~:text=Nate%20Cohn's%20Analysis-,Cross%2DTabs%3A%20May%202024%20Times%2FSiena,Poll%20of%20the%20Presidential%20Battlegrounds&text=Donald%20Trump%20leads%20Joe%20Biden,28%20to%20May%209%2C%202024.)** only had 22% of their respondents self-report as liberal vs. 36% conservative. **[Their October 2023 poll](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/11/07/us/elections/times-siena-battlegrounds-registered-voters.html)** was sampled at only 20% liberal vs. 36% conservative.

Another example of sampling bias was **[a March 2024 Grinnell College/Selzer Trump +7 poll](https://www.grinnell.edu/news/grinnell-college-national-poll-consensus-protecting-kids-social-media-not-school-shootings)** that was rolled into the RealClear Polling average during late March and early April. Scroll down to the section titled “_Biden Trails Trump and Loses Ground in Key Demographics_” and the caption of the graph therein reads:

> Source: Grinnell College National Poll - conducted by Selzer & Co.,  
> of 1,005 U.S. adults including 715 likely voters ( **308 Republicans, 231 Democrats** , 158 Independents), March 2024.

…

It’s also possible to run a squeaky-clean poll (or nearly so) in earnest, and then to repeat the process a few more times. A pollster can then pick just one set of results to report publicly – one that best supports the narrative of their choice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2024, 11:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/299 "2024-05-19T11:43:19Z")

</div>

This piece on recent polling strikes a good balance between exaggerated alarm and unwarranted complacency:

> **[Biden’s path to winning the Electoral College runs through the Midwest](https://abcnews.go.com/538/bidens-path-winning-electoral-college-runs-midwest/story?id=110231273)**
>
> Polls suggest Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania will be pivotal states for Biden's chances of winning the Electoral College.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TeroSunbear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/terosunbear/32/14748_2.png) [@TeroSunbear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TeroSunbear)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2024, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/300 "2024-05-20T01:05:19Z")

</div>

How exactly does Trump “understand” voters in these states? Blaming Biden is not exactly understanding. [CBS News poll finds Biden-Trump race tight in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin - CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-trump-poll-michigan-pennyslvania-wisconsin/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2024, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/302 "2024-05-20T02:17:34Z")

</div>

Worth noting in the MD case that Trone is a billionaire who owns a chain of 250 big-box liquor stores, whereas Alsobrooks is an African-American civil rights lawyer and longtime ally of Obama and Kamala Harris. In other words, Trone is exactly the kind of business-friendly candidate that the polls seem to be skewed in favor of these days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmyk](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmyk/32/3353_2.png) [@cmyk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmyk)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2024, 2:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779/303 "2024-05-20T14:24:30Z")

</div>

One area of how polling might not reach the younger sector are indeed smartphones. I can’t speak for Android, but I do know that since fairly recently, iPhones screen calls based on your contact list. _“Silence Unknown Callers”_ is on by default. [According to one survey,](https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/10/10/iphone-remains-the-top-smartphone-for-teenagers-says-piper-sandler) nearly 90% of Gen Z Americans use iPhones. So, if cold calling is one of the major tactics in reaching potential voters for most pollsters… they ain’t getting through.

Take that for what it’s worth.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779.md?page=14)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/polling-is-broken-right-or-is-it-the-news-or-all-of-the-us/993779.md?page=16)
