# Pope Benedict XVI and Catholic Jewish relations

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564
**Category:** Great Debates
**Created:** [January 29, 2009, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564 "2009-01-29T16:18:00Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/1 "2009-01-29T16:18:00Z")

</div>

The Pope [rehabilitates](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7855816.stm) a Holocaust denier bishop and is surprised that it throws off Catholic Jewish relations?

It _does_ seem that this Pope is undoing much of what Vatican 2 accomplished in warming Catholic Jewish relations. In context, earlier in his papacy he reintroduced [a version of the Good Friday Prayer](http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,542872,00.html) that many Jews find insulting, that had been replaced by Vatican 2.

> [@](#):
>
> The new wording is similar to the original version of the prayer, which read: “Let us pray also for the faithless Jews: that almighty God may remove the veil from their hearts; so that they too may acknowledge Jesus Christ our Lord.”
> 
> This original version was toned down at the 1962-1965 Second Vatican Council which introduced many far-reaching reforms of the Catholic Church, including replacing the Tridentine Mass with vernacular liturgies. The Good Friday Prayer then became: “Let us pray for the Jewish people, the first to hear the word of God, that they may continue to grow in the love of his name and in faithfulness to his covenant.”
> 
> In contrast to his predecessor Pope John Paul II, who was feted for his efforts to build bridges with other religions, Benedict has succeeded in alienating members of other faiths on several occasions since he took office in 2005. He offended Muslims with a 2006 speech at the University of Regensburg in which he quoted a Byzantine emperor who described Islam as violent. Many Jews were disappointed with Benedict’s 2006 visit to Auschwitz, having hoped for a stronger message on the Church’s role in the Holocaust. More recently, Jewish groups criticized Benedict’s meeting with a notoriously anti-Semitic Polish priest in August 2007.

It is a shame that he has chosen a path so different than Pope John Paul II’s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/2 "2009-01-29T16:51:36Z")

</div>

Well, in His Holy Defense, it’s probably not a specifically antisemitic move - that knucklehead seemed astonished that innocently saying (sorry, quoting, “I’m not the one saying it, no really !”) that Islam as a whole was evil, inhuman and inherently preached by the sword could be perceived as a negative comment by the Muslim community.

His Hatness isn’t big on fraternity and understanding between peoples, that’s all. Which probably means God ain’t either these days, since Benny’s canonically the mouth of Saur… I mean Yahweh.

ETA : heh, that was mentionned in your cite. Nevermind then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Huerta88](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/82dd89/32.png) [@Huerta88](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Huerta88)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/3 "2009-01-29T17:02:44Z")

</div>

It should be noted that the guys he rehabilitated (and what he did was dis-excommunicate them, i.e., only acknowledge that they are no longer beyond the pale – somewhat different to giving them a good conduct medal) were excommunicated in the first place not for their (it now emerges) goofy views on what the Nazis did, but for schismatic behavior (following a dissident bishop who was in open revolt against the Vatican). So it’s an internal governance matter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/4 "2009-01-29T18:34:44Z")

</div>

Unfortunately I have long noted that every non-Catholic, and most Catholics, have no bloody idea what excommunication is.

Which makes this entire thread, as well as the controversy itself, a lot of ignorance rolled into one little package.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/5 "2009-01-29T18:44:13Z")

</div>

> [@smiling\_bandit](#):
>
> Unfortunately I have long noted that every non-Catholic, and most Catholics, have no bloody idea what excommunication is.
> 
> Which makes this entire thread, as well as the controversy itself, a lot of ignorance rolled into one little package.

Except that the whole point of this thread is what message the pope is sending. If everyone in the world fails to understand what excommunication is, the pope should be aware of that, and should factor it into his decisions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Huerta88](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/82dd89/32.png) [@Huerta88](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Huerta88)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/6 "2009-01-29T18:46:14Z")

</div>

> [@MaxTheVool](#):
>
> Except that the whole point of this thread is what message the pope is sending. If everyone in the world fails to understand what excommunication is, the pope should be aware of that, and should factor it into his decisions.

Including his decisions about internal disciplinary proceedings? That hardly is a necessary truism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Anne\_Neville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Anne\_Neville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anne_Neville)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/7 "2009-01-29T19:07:46Z")

</div>

Would it have been possible for the Pope to revoke their excommunication with a minimum of publicity? (This is not a rhetorical question)

If that is possible, that would probably have been the way to go.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/8 "2009-01-29T19:13:48Z")

</div>

> [@Anne\_Neville](#):
>
> Would it have been possible for the Pope to revoke their excommunication with a minimum of publicity? (This is not a rhetorical question)
> 
> If that is possible, that would probably have been the way to go.

Can the Pope do anything with a minimum of publicity, though?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Huerta88](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/82dd89/32.png) [@Huerta88](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Huerta88)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/9 "2009-01-29T19:15:27Z")

</div>

> [@Anne\_Neville](#):
>
> Would it have been possible for the Pope to revoke their excommunication with a minimum of publicity? (This is not a rhetorical question)
> 
> If that is possible, that would probably have been the way to go.

I think he could have done it and tried to keep it quiet, but they (the former dissidents) would have wanted to publicize it. And the point (AFAICT) of lifting the excommunication was to reconcile internecine disputes over LeFebvre and his ultra-conservative constituency; it would hardly achieve the goal of bringing the sort of sedavacantists back from the fringe if they didn’t know their ‘martyrs’ had been found not to have been in super-grave error or insubordination worthy of excommunication.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mswas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e99b99/32.png) [@mswas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mswas)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/10 "2009-01-29T19:20:00Z")

</div>

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> Well, in His Holy Defense, it’s probably not a specifically antisemitic move - that knucklehead seemed astonished that innocently saying (sorry, quoting, “I’m not the one saying it, no really !”) that Islam as a whole was evil, inhuman and inherently preached by the sword could be perceived as a negative comment by the Muslim community.
> 
> His Hatness isn’t big on fraternity and understanding between peoples, that’s all. Which probably means God ain’t either these days, since Benny’s canonically the mouth of Saur… I mean Yahweh.
> 
> ETA : heh, that was mentionned in your cite. Nevermind then.

So what you’re saying is that you know next to nothing about the current pope?

I agree.

The Catholic Church is in the business of saving souls as they see it. Relationships with Jews are irrelevant if they conflict with the core mission.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/11 "2009-01-29T19:28:35Z")

</div>

I myself don’t have any problem with this version:

> [@](#):
>
> “Let us also pray for the Jews: That our God and Lord may illuminate their hearts, that they acknowledge that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all men.”

A bit annoying to have Catholics attempting to horn in, but that is what postheletizing religions do, more or less - seek to convert everyone to what they believe to be the Truth with a capital “T” (Judaism itself of course not falling into this category - it is not a prostheletizing religion).

The original version was clearly insulting:

> [@](#):
>
> “Let us pray also for the faithless Jews: that almighty God may remove the veil from their hearts; so that they too may acknowledge Jesus Christ our Lord.”

“Faithless Jews” is pretty clearly insulting and intended to be, as is the assertion that their hearts are “veiled”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![buttonjockey308](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bcef8e/32.png) [@buttonjockey308](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/buttonjockey308)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/12 "2009-01-29T20:04:42Z")

</div>

His poopiness doesn’t and doesn’t HAVE to care about the jews. He doesn’t care about much except Holy Mother Church and her mission in the world, which is his job technically, but his lack of human understanding means, at least to me that he’s no different, that the Taliban or any other fundamental group leader/tyrant. It’s another poor choice in a long history of poor choices by the Holy See, choosing this man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/13 "2009-01-29T20:21:35Z")

</div>

> [@Malthus](#):
>
> The original version was clearly insulting:
> 
> “Faithless Jews” is pretty clearly insulting and intended to be, as is the assertion that their hearts are “veiled”.

And it used to be “the perfidious Jews”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mswas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e99b99/32.png) [@mswas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mswas)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/14 "2009-01-29T20:22:48Z")

</div>

> [@buttonjockey308](#):
>
> His poopiness doesn’t and doesn’t HAVE to care about the jews. He doesn’t care about much except Holy Mother Church and her mission in the world, which is his job technically, but his lack of human understanding means, at least to me that he’s no different, that the Taliban or any other fundamental group leader/tyrant. It’s another poor choice in a long history of poor choices by the Holy See, choosing this man.

Lack of human understanding? :rolleyes:

Please prove that he doesn’t understand the issue. I am having trouble seeing it myself behind all the projection upon Pope Benedict’s state of mind.

I see no indication that he was surprised about anything, other than a misleading thread title of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/15 "2009-01-29T20:22:57Z")

</div>

> [@mswas](#):
>
> The Catholic Church is in the business of saving souls as they see it. Relationships with Jews are irrelevant if they conflict with the core mission.

That’s right! Just ask Pious XII.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mswas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e99b99/32.png) [@mswas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mswas)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/16 "2009-01-29T20:24:44Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> That’s right! Just ask Pious XII.

:rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sarahfeena](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sarahfeena/32/519_2.png) [@Sarahfeena](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarahfeena)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/17 "2009-01-29T20:30:04Z")

</div>

> [@MaxTheVool](#):
>
> Except that the whole point of this thread is what message the pope is sending. If everyone in the world fails to understand what excommunication is, the pope should be aware of that, and should factor it into his decisions.

In his decisions on whether or not someone should remain excommunicated? He can’t do that…the Pope technically doesn’t excommunicate someone…they excommunicate themselves by separating themselves from the Church and it’s teachings. These guys did that by not accepting the authority of Rome. If they change their minds and decide to fall back in line with Rome, then they are no longer outside the Church, and the Pope is merely acknowledging that. Excommunication isn’t a punishment for doing something really really bad, it’s just a state of being that a person chooses to be in, usually indicated by the person literally renouncing some doctrine the Church holds (not disobeying the doctrine, but coming right out and opposing it deliberately).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)
#### Post date: [January 29, 2009, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/18 "2009-01-29T21:33:29Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> That’s right! Just ask Pious XII.

Pius XII.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2009, 1:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/19 "2009-01-30T01:57:54Z")

</div>

> [@Sarahfeena](#):
>
> In his decisions on whether or not someone should remain excommunicated? He can’t do that…the Pope technically doesn’t excommunicate someone…they excommunicate themselves by separating themselves from the Church and it’s teachings. These guys did that by not accepting the authority of Rome. If they change their minds and decide to fall back in line with Rome, then they are no longer outside the Church, and the Pope is merely acknowledging that. Excommunication isn’t a punishment for doing something really really bad, it’s just a state of being that a person chooses to be in, usually indicated by the person literally renouncing some doctrine the Church holds (not disobeying the doctrine, but coming right out and opposing it deliberately).

Implying the pope had no choice in the matter? I find that a bit hard to believe.

If nothing else, he could have issued a statement (and maybe he did but it wasn’t widely reported) saying “these guys are utter douchebags and their views are loathsome and hateful and wrong and we hate them, BUT we have no choice but to do what is basically a minor procedural action, please don’t read anything into it”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2009, 2:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564/20 "2009-01-30T02:26:15Z")

</div>

> [@MaxTheVool](#):
>
> Implying the pope had no choice in the matter? I find that a bit hard to believe.
> 
> If nothing else, he could have issued a statement (and maybe he did but it wasn’t widely reported) saying “these guys are utter douchebags and their views are loathsome and hateful and wrong and we hate them, BUT we have no choice but to do what is basically a minor procedural action, please don’t read anything into it”.

It is not a minor matter. It is a religious principle that you can be a douchebag, and it’s between you and God. Excommunication has nothing to do with that. Second, the Church does not go around calling poeple douchebags. At least not in public.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pope-benedict-xvi-and-catholic-jewish-relations/483564.md?page=2)
