# Popular Mechanics the target of 9/11 conspiracy theorists!

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/popular-mechanics-the-target-of-9-11-conspiracy-theorists/376744
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share
**Created:** [October 17, 2006, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/popular-mechanics-the-target-of-9-11-conspiracy-theorists/376744 "2006-10-17T03:58:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)
#### Post date: [October 17, 2006, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/popular-mechanics-the-target-of-9-11-conspiracy-theorists/376744/1 "2006-10-17T03:58:11Z")

</div>

Last year, Popular Mechanics put out a special issue dealing with the techical issues of 9/11, debunking the various conspiracy theories. There’s an interesting article from the Editor-in-Chief giving an update: [The Conspiracy Industry](http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html). He gives an account of the flak they took from the conspiracy theorists, and also a well-rounded account of conspiracy theories generally.

Since “Did 9/11 really happen?” threads pop up from time-to-time in Great Debates, and are promptly slapped down, I thought people might find it interesting to read the article, but I don’t see a debate, so I stuck it here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ice\_Wolf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/dfb087/32.png) [@Ice\_Wolf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ice_Wolf)
#### Post date: [October 17, 2006, 9:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/popular-mechanics-the-target-of-9-11-conspiracy-theorists/376744/2 "2006-10-17T09:21:28Z")

</div>

Thanks for the link, **Northern Piper**. Off to have a good read of both articles now. Looks extremely interesting. Cheers.
