In the cause of fighting ignorance, it would be great if users defined their terms. Or at least gave a link to further reading.
Sorry; as a Dawkins fan I assumed the term to be common knowledge, much like “meme”. My fault.
I apologize if I came across as being snarky, but I never heard of the green-beard effect and have no idea who Dawkins is. I didn’t mean to sound so rude.
Tee-hee.
Hey , I’m not even British, and I don’t want to indulge in any “Beggin’ your pardon” exchange! Fair said, fair accepted!
But you should read Dawkins. Really.
And maybe also “get the female to stop paying attention to the foal and focus back on me”.
:dubious:
Wow, what a dick that yikes is.
This is pure speculation.
So, they quit mating once they’re pregnant. He’ll never be able to mate with her until after she gives birth, and once she gives birth, it obviously isn’t his. All he has to do is remember which females he’s gotten lucky with.
He could probably also tell whether a female is pregnant through her pheremones and put “kill her kid” on his to do list.
Animals are smarter than we give them credit for.
I grew up on a farm, and my own experience is people often back explain things to suit them. I would bet the Zebra has no real idea who is or who is not his foal and just killed it. It’s really very little biological expense for him to mate again, so if he kills one of his own, it’s not that big a deal to him.
And one thing I learned being raised amongst animals is simply some animals can be jerks.
Not whole species, but like some humans some animals are simply jerks.
I saw something similar with hippos in one doc. One of the males (I don’t think it was the Alpha Male, though) just decided to kill one of the calves.
Maybe like people, some hippos and zebras are just jerks.
A big part of the problem is that scientists often speak in shorthand, which lay people misunderstand.
Traits which tend to improve reproductive success are selected for in the animal world. So scientists say things like “this animal does X because it increases his reproductive success”, and people think the animal is consciously attempting to improve his (or her) reproductive success. In reality no animal has any clue about what does or doesn’t improve their reproductive success, and they couldn’t care less about it either. It’s all instincts that they don’t understand but which are selected for.
In this case, an instinct which would cause an animal to kill his own offspring would be selected against, while an instinct that caused him to kill anothers’ offspring might be selected for, in the right circumstances. Exactly what the instinct is is hard to know. Maybe smell, for all I know. Or maybe he kills all foals for X period of time after he takes over the herd. But he has no thought out plan for why he’s doing it - that much is obvious.
Let’s summarize all the theories presented so far in the thread:
-
Pheromones and smell.
-
Feticide and killing of male foals that weren’t able to be feticided.
-
Timing/killing of all male foals born within a certain time period.
-
Zebras are assholes.
-
Who knows?
Does that cover it?
To clarify a bit, when I wrote “X period of time” I was really thinking of the first season. I believe all baby zebras are born at around the same time, and it’s possible that a new stallion kills everyone born the first season (none of them will be his).
Njtt: Not so far from the truth. I have no cirte ready, but I understand that zebras have variations in their striping patterns that is unique from individual to individual. So while they may all look the same to us, they probably don’t to each other.
This makes perfect sense to me. I’m not sure why we are so quick to assume a zebra is too stupid to remember who he has mated with. In fact, he probably doesn’t need to “remember”. We humans usually feel some kind of connection with others we have mated with. There’s no reason a zebra couldn’t feel the same.
This is a known action in cats: a tom cat will kill the newborn kittens if they can. Doesn’t seem to matter if the kittens are his or not. Thus the mother moves the kittens to a new nest soon after giving birth.
And it’s not just “focus back on me”. In cats, the females will not mate again until the kittens are a few weeks old. Or dead. So a male killing the kittens will trigger the female to accept mating again.
Of course, cats are not herd animals like zebras, so this probably doesn’t apply to zebra stallions.
There’s also the possibility that the nature film edited the footing into a better story. Remember the Disney lemmings?