# pp.?  bbl.?  What's up with these abbreviations?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [May 10, 2005, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214 "2005-05-10T13:46:31Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Hyperelastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Hyperelastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hyperelastic)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/1 "2005-05-10T13:46:31Z")

</div>

Why is “pages” sometimes abbreviated “pp.”, instead of “pgs.”? What about “barrels”? Shouldn’t it be “brls.” and not “bbl.”? Do these oddball abbreviations hearken back to an archaic or foreign spelling? Folks, what’s up here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![brassballs](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/3d9bf3/32.png) [@brassballs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brassballs)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 2:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/2 "2005-05-10T14:05:36Z")

</div>

I hope someone answers this damn thing, I have been wondering about that barrel thing for a long time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Cliffy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/59ef9b/32.png) [@Cliffy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cliffy)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/3 "2005-05-10T14:10:01Z")

</div>

I’m curious about the origin as well, although the repetition of an abbreviation to designate the plural isn’t uncommon – I see it all the time in legal briefs where the section or paragraph symbol is repeated to reference multiple sections.

–Cliffy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tim314](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tim314/32/3468_2.png) [@tim314](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tim314)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/4 "2005-05-10T14:14:17Z")

</div>

> [@Hyperelastic](#):
>
> Why is “pages” sometimes abbreviated “pp.”, instead of “pgs.”? What about “barrels”? Shouldn’t it be “brls.” and not “bbl.”? Do these oddball abbreviations hearken back to an archaic or foreign spelling? Folks, what’s up here?

I’ve never heard the “barrels” one, but I was always taught that it was “p.” for “page”, and “pp.” for “pages.” Which suggests that it’s not based on any sort of unusal spelling, just a somewhat literal way of pluralizing “page.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Eurograff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/df705f/32.png) [@Eurograff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eurograff)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/5 "2005-05-10T14:18:41Z")

</div>

Exactly. When talking about a single page, single p. is used, when multiple pages, two pp. is customary, so you say p. 14 but pp. 15-20 for example. And it seems bbl means “blue barrel” originally, this is probably because oil companies used barrels colored blue. One reason why bbl is more popular than bl is that outside US the barrel unit is only referred to when talking about oil.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![vetbridge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b5e925/32.png) [@vetbridge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vetbridge)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/6 "2005-05-10T15:45:02Z")

</div>

Lymph node is often abbreviated ln. Lymph node **s** is often abbreviated lnn.

(veterinary medicine example)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bambi\_Hassenpfeffer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Bambi\_Hassenpfeffer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bambi_Hassenpfeffer)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/7 "2005-05-10T15:58:52Z")

</div>

> [@tim314](#):
>
> I’ve never heard the “barrels” one, but I was always taught that it was “p.” for “page”, and “pp.” for “pages.” Which suggests that it’s not based on any sort of unusal spelling, just a somewhat literal way of pluralizing “page.”

Which is odd, because Spanish does this same thing – UE = la Unión Europea = the European Union and EE.UU. = los Estados Unidos = the United States.

I’ve been wondering if it has roots in Latin, or if it’s a separate development.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bibliophage](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bibliophage/32/7615_2.png) [@bibliophage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bibliophage)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/8 "2005-05-10T21:09:49Z")

</div>

I suspect this usage does derive from Latin. In English it’s usually a simple matter to add -s to pluralize the word. In Latin, there are many different plural endings, depending on case and declension, so it is simpler to double the first letter of the word, or for phrases, of the important word(s). The website [http://www.roman-britain.org/latin.htm](http://www.roman-britain.org/latin.htm) shows that this method of forming the plural of abbreviations was not unknonw in Latin in Roman times (for example AA NN = Augusti Nostri = our emperors). It may be related to the doubling of the initial letter to express the superlative (ff=fortissimo, pp=pianissimo) but I can’t find evidence that this usage was common in Roman times.

In modern English, these are some common examples for some words derived from Latin.

c. = chapter (L. caput)  
cc. = chapters (L. capita)

v. = verse (L. versus [short second “u”])  
vv. = verses (L. versus [long second “u”])

p. = page (L. pagina)  
pp. = pages (L. paginae)

ms. = manuscript (L. manu scriptum, a thing written by hand)  
mss. = manuscripts (L. manu scripta, things written by hand)

LL.B., LL.D., or LL.M. = Bachelor, Doctor, or Master of Law (L. Legum Baccalaureus, Legum Doctor, Legum Magister, where legum is the genitive plural of lex, “a law”)

q.v. = see which thing (L. quod vide)  
qq.v. = see which things (L. quae vide)

I would guess that this pluralizing process has been generalized to words not of Latin origin, which explains bbl. for barrels and hhd. for hogshead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bibliophage](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bibliophage/32/7615_2.png) [@bibliophage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bibliophage)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2005, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/9 "2005-05-10T21:22:54Z")

</div>

> [@bibliophage](#):
>
> I would guess that this pluralizing process has been generalized to words not of Latin origin, which explains bbl. for barrels and hhd. for hogshead.

:smack: I should have read **Eurograff** ’s post more closely and I should have guessed that hhd. means **h** ogs **h** ead. It appears both bbl. and hhd. can be used as either the singular or plural.

“Blue Barrel” is the correct origin of bbl., according to the Department of Energy. I didn’t know that before. [EIA Energy Kids - Energy Kids: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)](http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts/sources/non-renewable/bluebarrel.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Hyperelastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Hyperelastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hyperelastic)
#### Post date: [May 11, 2005, 1:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/pp-bbl-whats-up-with-these-abbreviations/303214/10 "2005-05-11T01:46:00Z")

</div>

> [@bibliophage](#):
>
> I suspect this usage does derive from Latin. In English it’s usually a simple matter to add -s to pluralize the word…

Fascinating! Thank you.
