# Prince William 'eligible'

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [June 24, 2000, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373 "2000-06-24T00:19:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lindsay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/3be4f8/32.png) [@lindsay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lindsay)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/1 "2000-06-24T00:19:18Z")

</div>

Yawn, so William is now 18. Someone was swooning and saying he is the world’s most elibible bachlor.

My question is eligible for what? Lottery winnings, a scholarship?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tracer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tracer/32/20578_2.png) [@tracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tracer)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/2 "2000-06-24T00:28:53Z")

</div>

I though “eligible” in “eligible bachelor” was a code word meaning “rich guy.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ike\_Witt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ike_witt/32/283_2.png) [@Ike\_Witt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ike_Witt)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/3 "2000-06-24T00:34:34Z")

</div>

I heard on the radio that William has to marry a virgin. However, he himself doesn’t have to be one. T

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tracer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tracer/32/20578_2.png) [@tracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tracer)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/4 "2000-06-24T00:43:03Z")

</div>

Yeah. I remember it was a big deal that Lady Diana, before she was allowed to marry Prince Charles, had to be inspected by a doctor to ensure that her hymen was intact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HomeSlice](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/9d8465/32.png) [@HomeSlice](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HomeSlice)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/5 "2000-06-24T01:06:59Z")

</div>

Hey, he may be the sh!t and all, but he still drives a VW Golf. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Sorry. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 2:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/6 "2000-06-24T02:12:31Z")

</div>

He used to be on my total heartthrob list, but he’s looking more and more like his father these days. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![casdave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c6cbf5/32.png) [@casdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/casdave)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 11:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/7 "2000-06-24T11:32:23Z")

</div>

Yeah , wealth and unearned privelidge are always a turn-on aren’t they ladies?

And to think there is a thread saying women are better than men.

Just goes to show how superficial we all can be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TomH](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/90db22/32.png) [@TomH](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TomH)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 11:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/8 "2000-06-24T11:43:24Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I heard on the radio that William has to marry a virgin. However, he himself doesn’t have to be one.

Not true.

> [@](#):
>
> Lady Diana, before she was allowed to marry Prince Charles, had to be inspected by a doctor to ensure that her hymen was intact.

Also not true. BTW, a ruptured hymen is not conclusive evidence that a woman has had sexual intercourse; there are other things that can rupture the hymen.

I have heard this a number of times from Americans, and it’s not true. I think it may have arisen from the fact that to commit adultery with the wife of the heir to the throne is technically treason (though no prosecution would ever be brought these days).

There is now at least some prospect of the heir to the throne marrying a divorced mother of two. I don’t think it will happen, but nobody is saying, “Well, she’s not a virgin, so that’s that.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ruadh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/d2c977/32.png) [@ruadh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ruadh)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 12:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/9 "2000-06-24T12:09:20Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*\*  
> Yeah , wealth and unearned privelidge are always a turn-on aren’t they ladies?
> 
> And to think there is a thread saying women are better than men.
> 
> Just goes to show how superficial we all can be.  
> \*\*

Casdave, can you please quote the post in which a woman here says that she finds his wealth and privilege a turn-on?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![David\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@David\_B](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_B)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 12:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/10 "2000-06-24T12:31:40Z")

</div>

[Moderator Hat: ON]

I can think of nothing more Mundane and Pointless than the British royal family. So off it goes…

* * *

David B, SDMB Great Debates Moderator

[Moderator Hat: Handed Off to Euty & Unc]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![casdave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c6cbf5/32.png) [@casdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/casdave)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 2:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/11 "2000-06-24T14:35:53Z")

</div>

Read **Lindsay** and **Tracey**

Looks to me as if they think that is the main attraction to some people, even if they themselves do not hold with that view.

What else makes this rather ordinary looking boy seem so special?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DVous\_Means](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9fc29f/32.png) [@DVous\_Means](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DVous_Means)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/12 "2000-06-24T14:41:28Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*\*  
> I can think of nothing more Mundane and Pointless than the British royal family. So off it goes…
> 
> \*\*

Bravo! I couldn’t agree more. Just wish a few more Australians felt the same way a few months ago…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/aeb1de/32.png) [@Andy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Andy)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 2:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/13 "2000-06-24T14:42:32Z")

</div>

What irks me about issues such as this is the double standards. People are quite happy to bandy about phrases such as elegible bachelor and the like with regard to an eighteen year old who is no more than a kid. Would you be happy about this if it were _your_ child who was treated as some king of pseudo sex symbol? I think not. the sooner people stop taking any notice _whatsoever_, of this kind of media crap, including talking of it cynically, the better for all of us, the royal family included.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baglady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/cab0a1/32.png) [@Baglady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baglady)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2000, 3:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prince-william-eligible/23373/14 "2000-06-24T15:20:33Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> There is now at least some prospect of the heir to the throne marrying a divorced mother of two. I don’t think it will happen, but nobody is saying, “Well, she’s not a virgin, so that’s that.”

I didn’t realize she had two kids. Well, Charles is also a divorced parent of two.

Hey, it’s almost like the Brady Bunch! :rolleyes:
