The most offensive quality of the Florida pro-life plate - and I see one pretty much every day - is that its color is virtually the same shade of yellow as “official vehicle” plates like those seen on cop cars and state vehicles etc. A subtle, yet clearly willful way to make that pet cause “official”.
Oh, and no pro-choice plate, natch. (Too offensive to the tender, fetal ears of the Baptist mafia.)
According to the ACLU Ohio’s website, concerning the case of the license plates, they have followed procedure as outlined in the case here (warning: PDF file).
If you check out page 53 of that PDF document, you will see that the proposed “Pro-Choice” plates would, in similar fashion, have proceeds go to medically FACTUAL information about pregnancy options including adoption and abortion, the money will go to non-profit organizations to offer medically sound information about contraceptives.
But they still refuse to hear it. So the Ohio House is definitely in the wrong here and hopefully the bill will be overturned due to unconstitutionality. I think the ACLU has a winning case here. Providing outlets for both sides or taking it away altogether should be the proper ruling on this.
This message courtesy of your friends from South Carolina, where we only make the news when we do something outrightly racist, moronic, or just plain pathetic.
You know, the sad thing is that after a while, one gets so tired of being outraged at this crap that all you can do is say to yourself, “Well- there they go again”.
Oh, grow up. At least they use the money for a good cause. I heard that a percentage of the donation for each plate goes to groups that fight the death penalty, stop foreign wars where lots of civilans are killed and eliminate AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa and southeast Asia. But I’m having a hard time finding a cite for any of that.
Nope, I agree with ShibbOleth, I think maybe some of the money from the choice life WILL go to support gun control and mandatory gun lock legislation, AIDs education in inner city’s (with a free condom distribution), and feeding the homeless downtown. I mean, that’s what they meant by choice life, right? :rolleyes: I’ll begin looking for that silly citation if you don’t believe me …
This Year’s Model, those all do sound like worthwhile aims. I hope that all people who have the “Choose Life” tags are thinking about that and are not, in fact, just anti-choice bigots intent in mucking in other people’s lives to satisfy their own religious zealotry.
FWIW, to me the term “Pro Life” is a big lie; we should be more direct and call it “Anti-abortion”. I’ve not found many people who are truly “pro life” in all it’s various connotations. Maybe some Buddhists and a few minor Christian sects.
No, I agree completely. If a woman chooses to carry the baby and give it up for adoption (two of my sisters have done just that), and the money from the plates goes to assist them, I think that’s wonderful! I also agree with your concern about it.
I just wanted to point out that if people are telling you the money is going to the other things you mentioned, they’re wrong. Or am I, in fact, wooshed?
And good for your sisters. My baby sister has a daughter that she chose to have and raise on her own and in the end this was certainly the right choice for her. But I’d hate to live in a place where that was her only choice. It’s not been the easiest life, and without a lot of help from family I don’t know how she would have managed.
Absolutely it is a restriction. If you establish a forum for free speech, such as ‘issue’ license plates, the First Amendment requires you to be neutral as to the message presented. Disallowing a pro-choice plate is not in itself a restriction on free speech, disallowing it once you have allowed a pro-life one is, however. In fact, you can argue that disallowing it when you have allowed any ‘issue’ plate is.
When they tried this in Tennessee it caused a lot of people to look at the legality of the program after all. Any restrictions on messages have to be neutrally based in order to pass muster (the requirement of a certain number of signatures appears to be neutral, for example). But it looks like it would be tough to allow, for example, a ‘Racial Harmony’ plate without also permitting the Klan to have one, unless they could not meet the neutral requirements. In the end, my guess is the only way to satisfy the First Amendment and avoid such plates (if one wants to avoid them) is to disallow ALL of these plates. Personally I’d allow any group that can meet the requirements to get its own plate. At least then you can know which of your neighbors you need to snub.
It may turn out to be more of a mandate and less of a free-speech issue here in Florida. On the news this morning there was mention of a 13 year old girl who had tried to get an abortion but was not being allowed to do so by Bush or DCF, because she was “too young” to make her own medical decisions.
I can’t find anything to cite on this yet, and the radio is not the most exact form of communication, so I hope that I’m misunderstanding something here. But this has the potential to turn into Schiavo AND Gonzalez all wrapped into one.