# Probability question -

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 3, 2021, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030 "2021-09-03T03:48:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/1 "2021-09-03T03:48:23Z")

</div>

I just saw this online:

> If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance that you will be correct?
> 
> A. 25%  
> B. 0%  
> C. 50%  
> D. 25%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 4:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/2 "2021-09-03T04:01:07Z")

</div>

Are you picking a letter or a number?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 4:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/3 "2021-09-03T04:13:23Z")

</div>

You pick a letter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 4:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/4 "2021-09-03T04:18:43Z")

</div>

Cute. The nice thing is you can reason it out without much knowledge of probability.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 4:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/5 "2021-09-03T04:33:30Z")

</div>

I don’t think it can be answered when the question is worded that way, assuming I can pick only one answer and have to choose one.

If 25% were the correct answer, both A and D would meet the criteria, which would be selected 50% of the time at random, thus nullifying A and D as correct possibilities. Now one might think C is the answer, as that is also 50%, but if it were, it would only be selected at random 25% of the time, thus nullifying itself as well. If the answer were 0%, then B would be correct, except the fact that B is correct means it can no longer be true, as it will be selected 25% of the time.

I don’t think this is a probabilities question, looking at it this way, but I might have missed something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/6 "2021-09-03T05:17:35Z")

</div>

> [@DMC](#):
>
> If 25% were the correct answer, both A and D would meet the criteria, which would be selected 50% of the time at random, thus nullifying A and D as correct possibilities. Now one might think C is the answer, as that is also 50%, but if it were, it would only be selected at random 25% of the time, thus nullifying itself as well. If the answer were 0%, then B would be correct, except the fact that B is correct means it can no longer be true, as it will be selected 25% of the time.

Going a step beyond this, what if the correct answer is 10%? That’s not even a choice. So you have no chance of picking the correct answer if you chose an answer at random.

But if you have 0% chance of getting the correct answer at random, then you have a 25% chance of choosing B, which is the correct answer, at random.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 5:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/7 "2021-09-03T05:19:02Z")

</div>

I will state right now that I have presented the entire problem as I saw it. I don’t know what the correct answer is. I also don’t know if there is a correct answer or if this is just a trick question with no answer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/8 "2021-09-03T05:20:25Z")

</div>

0%. A number I picked randomly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 5:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/9 "2021-09-03T05:44:24Z")

</div>

It’s a paradox, if it helps. So, yes, a trick question of sorts.

ETA: 0% is definitely not it. If the true probability of getting the correct answer is 0% but the probability of choosing the 0% option is 25%, then clearly, that can’t be it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 12:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/10 "2021-09-03T12:33:52Z")

</div>

One could just as well ask a similar question, with the answer choices  
A: 1/2  
B: 1/3  
C: 1/2  
D: 1/6  
E: 1/2  
F: 1/3

Now, instead of none of the answers working, any of them works.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/11 "2021-09-03T13:18:48Z")

</div>

> [@Great\_Antibob](#):
>
> It’s a paradox, if it helps. So, yes, a trick question of sorts.

Yes, this. As @DMC explained, you have a 50% chance of answering “25%” and a 25% chance of answering “50%” and a 25% chance of answering “0%” (as I belive the question was meant to be interpreted), so no answer is correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/12 "2021-09-03T14:30:44Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> One could just as well ask a similar question, with the answer choices  
> A: 1/2  
> B: 1/3  
> C: 1/2  
> D: 1/6  
> E: 1/2  
> F: 1/3
> 
> Now, instead of none of the answers working, any of them works.

Not so, because then the actual answer should be 100%. Oh wait.

Absolutely a paradox. Both this and the original.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/13 "2021-09-03T15:44:55Z")

</div>

No, my example wouldn’t be 100%, because that would require all answer choices to be correct at the same time.

On the other hand, I’m still not convinced that any of this is particularly interesting. One could also have a multiple choice question that went

What’s 1+1?  
A) 7  
B) 3  
C) 0  
D) cucumber

None of those answers works, either, but nobody says that that’s a paradox. We just say that it’s a bad question.

Or, for an analogue to my six-option question, we could have

What is the correct answer to this question?  
A) A  
B) B  
C) C  
D) D

Or for that matter,

What is the correct answer to this question?  
A) B  
B) C  
C) D  
D) A

All any of this shows is “it’s possible to use the English language to construct stupid questions”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/14 "2021-09-03T16:56:36Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Or, for an analogue to my six-option question, we could have
> 
> What is the correct answer to this question?  
> A) A  
> B) B  
> C) C  
> D) D
> 
> Or for that matter,
> 
> What is the correct answer to this question?  
> A) B  
> B) C  
> C) D  
> D) A

No, I don’t feel this is the same thing. In these questions, there is no path to a correct answer. The determination of what a correct answer is doesn’t exist.

But asking what is the probability that a question will be answered correctly is a legitimate question that can produce an objective answer.

For example, if the question was

> If you were asked to spell the following words - cat, dog, mouse, pterodactyl - what percentage of them would you spell correctly?
> 
> A. 0%  
> B. 25%  
> C. 50%  
> D. 75%  
> E. 100%

I don’t think anyone would dispute that this question produces a objectively correct answer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/15 "2021-09-03T17:11:36Z")

</div>

And by extension, if you were asked the following question:

> If you chose a random answer to how many of the following words - cat, dog, mouse, pterodactyl - you could spell correctly, what is the chance you would get the correct answer?
> 
> A. 0%  
> B. 25%  
> C. 50%  
> D. 100%

Now, let’s say you are an expert speller and you know you can spell 100% of those words. Which is one of the possible answers on the list. So if you randomly chose from the four possible answers, the probability you would choose the correct answer is 25%. B is the correct answer to this problem.

The issue is that this question (what are the chances you will get the right answer) is asking about the answer to a different question (how many of these words can you spell). So I’m not sure if it works if the question is self-reflective like the one in the OP is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/16 "2021-09-03T17:15:45Z")

</div>

It does seem possible to construct a valid self-reflective question. Like this:

> If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance that you will be correct?
> 
> A. 100%  
> B. 100%  
> C. 100%  
> D. 100%

Or even:

> If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance that you will be correct?
> 
> A. 0%  
> B. 25%  
> C. 50%  
> D. 100%

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 6:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/17 "2021-09-03T18:13:15Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> It does seem possible to construct a valid self-reflective question. Like this:
> 
> > If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance that you will be correct?
> > 
> > A. 100%  
> > B. 100%  
> > C. 100%  
> > D. 100%

But is that actually valid? I could also say that the correct answer is 0%, as supported by the fact that 0% isn’t one of the answer choices, so you can’t select it.

One problem with self-referential questions like this is that we don’t have a good notion of what “correct” means. And if we try to replace the notion of “correct” with some other notion whose meaning we do know, such as “provable”, then the question becomes fundamentally different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naita](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/naita/32/5862_2.png) [@naita](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/naita)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/18 "2021-09-03T19:05:45Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> I don’t think anyone would dispute that this question produces a objectively correct answer.

I would. Sort of. This one not a question in the sense of “this has a correct answer that you should try to deduce or already know”, it’s a question asking you to predict an outcome. If I answer D and then never try to spell those words, did I give the correct answer? Would the others have been incorrect?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/19 "2021-09-03T19:47:25Z")

</div>

This is basically a reformulation of Russel’s Paradox, which asks “Does the set of sets that do not contain themselves contain itself”. If it does, then it doesn’t, and vice versa. A logical paradox.

Self referential questions sometimes have a logically consistent answer, and sometimes they don’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2021, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030/20 "2021-09-03T19:58:04Z")

</div>

> [@naita](#):
>
> This one not a question in the sense of “this has a correct answer that you should try to deduce or already know”, it’s a question asking you to predict an outcome. If I answer D and then never try to spell those words, did I give the correct answer? Would the others have been incorrect?

I disagree. The question isn’t asking how many of those words you _will_ spell correctly. It’s asking how many you _could_ spell correctly.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/probability-question/950030.md?page=2)
