[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by wring *
**
Wring-
I do admit that I work in kind of an unusual industry, but the mentality of the casino industry is leaking out into other types of businesses here in Vegas. We are talking about a state where labor law heavily favors the employer, and the casino industry represents the larges group of employers in town, possibly even the state.
The situation you describe of a place having mostly bad workers exists at my former workplace. Maybe a fourth of the people in the dice pit are good dealers with good attitutes who are cooperative and easy to work with. These people have all been there five years or more.
It’s primarily the three years or less crowd that is so bad. I wouldn’t say it’s an industry-wide thing, not yet anyway. But it is something that seems to be on the increase even in just the three years I’ve been in the business. People with poor dealing skills or skilled dealers with bad attitudes seem to be favored, at least in some of the lower end properties owned by the larger companies. Some companies are basically trying to run their high-rollers off of the lower end properties and encouraging them to play at the company’s more upscale, properties, or at newer properties that the company is trying to justify having sunk literally hundreds of millions of dollars into building. The cynical, paranoid streak in me does wonder if the companies are deliberately trying to get poor employees into the lower-end properties because someone who’s only playing a couple of hundred dollars wouldn’t expect the same level of service as someone who’s playing a couple of hundred grand and if they did, they would be less likely to toke the bad dealers.Tokes come primarily from bets placed by the customer for the dealers, and are money the casino can’t win back, therefore a low-end property has a vested interest in keeping tokes down.
Also, what about the situation where someone (me, for example) is a good worker and does their job correctly but a particular supervisor takes a dislike to them , or perhaps is trying to cover up for the fact that he/she is not paying proper attention to his/her own job, and when a problem results, falsely claims they are not following certain procedures? In a probation situation, that employee may not even be called into the office for the documented verbal warning, and thus not given an opportunity to answer a false accusation.
In all the companies I’ve worked for, the progressive disciplinary progress isn’t all that burdensome. It’s basically three progressive steps, then out the door, and the paperwork isn’t terribly complicated.
Also, in the casino industry, it is quite common, even usual, for dealers to be let go during probation without ever having been told they were not up to standards. A dealer I once worked with was let go on his 89th day. The reason given was an appearance standards violation. Basically, he needed a haircut. Nobody had said anything to him about his hair, and most of us don’t make that trip to the barber/beautician until we realize our hair is getting a bit out of hand. Really, this situation could have been handled by a floorman telling the guy to go get a trim, and if he refused, well, then take more severe action.