What liberal has said that throwing pig’s blood at a mosque is worse than Radical Islamic Terror?
As usual, you just make shit up.
What liberal has said that throwing pig’s blood at a mosque is worse than Radical Islamic Terror?
As usual, you just make shit up.
Don’t think this has been mentioned yet, but progressives like this administration?: The U.S. Agrees to Give Israel Record $38 Billion in Military Aid | Fortune
nice tangent.
This is a thread about Islam, not Israel, even tho Israel is a nation of winners bc they fight Islamic terror and honour capitalism, freedom, and liberal democracy. Obama knows he’d only help Trump by vetoing it, and making the Democrats look soft on Islamic terror by opposing a nation that fights Islamic terror.
I would note that you started the tangent, i.e.,
But I’ll leave it at that and not respond to your…interesting…take.
The Israel, home of the kibbutz… it honors capitalism. Funny person this derek, he is not only a racist bigot who does the bad job of pretending to be a left wing person, he lives in a fantasy world.
Ignorant bigoted cowards like Derek will try to avoid the real world so they won’t learn how ignorant, bigoted, and cowardly they are.
While I obviously agree with much of what you’re saying blaming the rise of radical Islam on “poverty” is silly. Muhammad Atta and Bin Laden weren’t from poor families. In fact Muslim radicals are far more likely to come from educated, relatively well-off families.
But most of the foot soldiers, suicide bombers, etc., are poor. Take away the poverty, and ISIS would lose most of their fighters, as well as most of the recruiting efforts. Recruiting the truly desperate is much, much easier than recruiting the comfortable.
So did the European left radicals of an earlier era, Bolsheviks leaderships and similar.
This is not a counter point, it is a superficiality.
The frustrated middle that is angered by the lack of the progress, the evident injustices in their society, and having the intellectual tools to organize a response, they are always the typical leadership of the radical organization.
the fact that they are, it does not refute the roots in a certain frustration with a corruption or an oligarchy and the poverty or at least the economic stagnation that comes with it.
A Bin Laden has an idea of social justice and a frustration with real injustices. His solution of course was evil, but the roots are correctly seen in this reality.
I didn’t say “the comfortable”. More like “the frustrated middle class”. And no, I wouldn’t assume most of the volunteers going to serve ISIS are poor or uneducated.
And much of the motivation of the more talented of the leaderships.
there will always be the radical discontents, but the attraction of more then the smallest fringe, this is rooted in some real problems which they provide bad solutions for them.
Not the ones coming from abroad, but the “local” ISIS fighters (who make up the majority IIRC), I believe, are mostly poor.
Lets not forget that the entire region has a very long and storied history of tribalism and factionalism. Islam initially came in and replaced all that with one internal faction and external enemies, but that soon devolved back into internal factionalism, same as pretty much every Human organization ever.
So this is another faction, which grew rapidly, recruiting from the disaffected, as it scored victory after victory and expanded from Syria to the very doors of Baghdad.
There are always a fuckton of disaffected youth, and older people for that matter. Everywhere. Daesh (I refuse to use 'ISIS 'as I have my own affection for Isis, the Egyptian Goddess) gave them a place to be a part of, a growing organization to seek power in, and an outlet for a lot of regular, average mopey angst and anger.
Just as we have these same kind of assholes in our nation occupying parks and threatening internal war over their perceived oppression.
So as every other human region as of course the Europe has been so free of factionalism and factionalist and ethno-tribalistic warfare these centuries.
.
et voila so beni adam beni adam.
Quelle le fuq?
Just because a few middle class people join doesn’t change that it’s mostly full of poorer people. The actual connection will be people who feel powerless, and that’s more likely to be poor people, with a few stragglers who are less poor.
There’s a reason why there’s less of this sort of thing in richer countries, even among people who clearly feel oppressed. Just look at the Shooting War thread in GD. We’re too content to go that far. ISIS/Daesh/ISIL/IS are not.
You’re not very familiar with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt are you?