CP, I think you need to go back and read the decision and familiarize yourself with how laws fundamentally work. You are a person who has a partial grasp of the subject and tries to stretch that out into an argument. It’s not working, everyone can see it but you, and further arguing is not going to help anyone because you either can’t or refuse to become more knowledgeable in the subject.
Basically, your understanding of the difference between an inherent quality and a chosen one is flawed. You may understand it if you contrasted the difference on something mundane, like eye color or height vs. occupation, but bring in the subject of gays, religion, and marriage and your understanding falls apart. However, you’ve shown that you’ve got a hell of an axe to grind against gays by referring to them as some medical anomaly that needs to be cured, so I don’t think you’ll ever want to be proven incorrect with facts.