YogSosoth, your demeaning post does nothing to bolster your claim. As it stands, Walker’s ruling is not the law of the land, nor is it immune from critique. Nor is Walker himself immune. Dio and others wanted to conflate the constitutionality of same sex marriage with recusing one’s self, but whatever.
Walker’s ruling (and Wane’s) both derive from legal precedent. What posters in this thread have done is try to address that precedent. If you can’t, then scoot.
No, I don’t think you understand that some people feel that religion is a mental affliction (like Dio) and some find religion to be as natural as a pull as, say, breathing.
Except that one’s sexual orientation is not mundane, and it it were such, then I’m going to form a PAC for the Protection of the Rights of Short Blonds Everywhere.
Cite?
Finally, thank you BigT.