# Prop 8 trial update: Walker's ruling upheld

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 14, 2011, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500 "2011-06-14T22:31:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 136

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2011, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500/136 "2011-06-16T21:05:35Z")

</div>

> [@CitizenPained](#):
>
> Step 1: Open pants.  
> Step 2: Look down.

This is not an answer to the question. If you can’t cite your claim (and you can’t), just admit it. You asserted that biology has an “intention.” Cite?

> [@](#):
>
> edit: Left-handed people _are_ abnormal.
> 
> [Medical anomaly](http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=2265)

Left-handedness is not a medical anomaly. Neither is homosexuality.

> [@](#):
>
> **Dio** , if reproduction weren’t an innate desire, then why the fuck to lesbians get sperm donors to have their own children? Duh.

Your claim was not that people desire to reproduce, but that they are _intended_ to? Intended to by who? You can’t have intention without an intender. Who is the intender?

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500)._