# Prop 8 trial update: Walker's ruling upheld

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 14, 2011, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500 "2011-06-14T22:31:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 137

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Farmer\_Jane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Farmer\_Jane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farmer_Jane)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2011, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500/137 "2011-06-16T21:10:13Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> This is not an answer to the question. If you can’t cite your claim (and you can’t), just admit it. You asserted that biology has an “intention.” Cite?  
> Left-handedness is not a medical anomaly. Neither is homosexuality.
> 
> Your claim was not that people desire to reproduce, but that they are _intended_ to? Intended to by who? You can’t have intention without an intender. Who is the intender?

Dio, I just cited what a medical anomaly was. Let me guess. Your post is your cite? When will you understand that you don’t get to redefine things because you feel like it?

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/prop-8-trial-update-walkers-ruling-upheld/585500)._