# Proposed rule: cut-and-paste from AI must be in quote box

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051
**Category:** About This Message Board
**Created:** [February 27, 2026, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051 "2026-02-27T16:01:01Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/1 "2026-02-27T16:01:01Z")

</div>

Inspired by this post:

> [@What were you THINKING?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/6737):
>
> This is a faceless, anonymous message board. All you have is the text you write - it’s not only what you say, as far as the rest of us are concerned, it’s who you _are_. That’s why the text of your post is supposed to be something you yourself wrote.
> 
> So if you’re quoting someone or some thing, put it in a quote box.

It should be against the rules to post AI crap without putting it in a quote-box. There’s enough AI crap on the internet that this board should, IMO, make this minimum effort to make it easy to identify (and thus ignore, if so desired).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/2 "2026-02-27T16:06:58Z")

</div>

Continuing the discussion from [What were you THINKING?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/6746):

> [@What were you THINKING?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/6746):
>
> > [@What were you THINKING?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/6737):
> >
> > This is a faceless, anonymous message board. All you have is the text you write - it’s not only what you say, as far as the rest of us are concerned, it’s who you _are_. That’s why the text of your post is supposed to be something you yourself wrote.
> > 
> > So if you’re quoting someone or some thing, put it in a quote box.
> 
> I’ll endorse this and go so far as to say it should be enshrined as a rule on this board.

This is an excellent idea and should get some discussion outside the BBQ Pit. To repeat for emphasis.

Proposed rule:  
If you’re quoting something not written by yourself, put it in a quote box. This could be text from another poster or copied from another source, such as another website or an AI chatbot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/3 "2026-02-27T16:08:30Z")

</div>

I merged the two threads together.

**Moderating:**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/4 "2026-02-27T16:09:29Z")

</div>

Sounds good in theory but how would mods catch it? AI is becoming more and more convincing and less obvious than before. It can sound really human-conversational, to the point some humans may get accused of using AI when not quoting AI, or vice versa, AI slips in unnoticed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/5 "2026-02-27T16:10:45Z")

</div>

Yes, I agree. I just created a thread for the same point (I’ve flagged it to be merged. And so it has.)

Most of my irritation of AI content would be soothed if it were in a quote box. We do that for quoting other websites. We should do it for any significant block of text coming from a source not the poster.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/6 "2026-02-27T16:10:53Z")

</div>

Co-sign.

I previously advocated that AI slop should be inside a “hide details” collapsing section thing, so anyone who _wants_ to see it can open it but it’s not inflicted on the rest of us, but got no traction. If I can’t have that, I’ll grudgingly accept a quote box as a compromise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/7 "2026-02-27T16:11:37Z")

</div>

Mods won’t always catch it, just like they won’t always catch socks and trolls and other rule violators. That doesn’t mean those are bad rules.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/8 "2026-02-27T16:14:49Z")

</div>

I don’t think what **msmith537** wrote was inappropriate: they did say the response was from ChatGPT and they did put it inside quotation marks (though they may be hard to notice.) That said, it would be helpful to use properly attributed quote blocks for AI responses. (Ideally, as someone who generally supports AI, I would think it is more useful for a poster to read the response and form their own reply based on it, as AI slop does annoy me on message boards. If I want a ChatGPT response, I’ll use ChatGPT. I want to hear what the personalities of the Dope think in their own words, even if some of it is informed by AI research.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/9 "2026-02-27T16:17:31Z")

</div>

Very short snippets could be in quote marks, but anything longer than about a sentence or two should be in a quote block. Visually, a paragraph should be in a quote block.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/10 "2026-02-27T16:18:46Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> If you’re quoting something not written by yourself, put it in a quote box. This could be text from another poster or copied from another source, such as another website or an AI chatbot.

Agreeing; with the addition that the post should include saying who the quote’s from, with link if applicable.

ETA: of course this won’t stop deliberate rule breakers, any more than any other rule does. But I think a lot of the problem isn’t from people wanting to sneak AI in undetected, but with people who just want to use it without clearly distinguishing it from their own post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/11 "2026-02-27T16:26:47Z")

</div>

> [@Cervaise](#):
>
> I previously advocated that AI slop should be inside a “hide details” collapsing section thing, so anyone who _wants_ to see it can open it but it’s not inflicted on the rest of us, but got no traction.

I would very much like this to be the case, still a distant second to “don’t copy/paste AI because this is a board for humans to read things written by other humans.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/12 "2026-02-27T16:43:50Z")

</div>

I don’t know that it should be in a quote box, per se. But it should be clear that you are posting something from AI somehow, whether it’s a quote box, or italicized, or in a collapsed spoiler box.

I also don’t think we really need a new rule, do we? Isn’t it already forbidden to copy-and-paste from elsewhere without attribution? If I were to find a social media post, or a news article, or a YouTube video, and reproduce what was there as if it was my own words, wouldn’t that already be a violation? It should be, if not.

The only thing I’d propose as a new rule for AI contributions is to require people to say where it’s from. And not “AI”, but rather _which_ AI. Because they aren’t all the same, and different AI engines have different reputations. Much like you shouldn’t say “I read this in the news”, it matters if this was from the _New York Times_ or _National Enquirer_ or _One American News Network_ or _Russia Today_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/13 "2026-02-27T16:50:08Z")

</div>

Can someone link to the offending post that set this off, if any rules are being added or appended, this has to be presented to @Ed_Zotti.

I just merged the 2 almost simul threads on this topic and don’t know the root cause. I know it didn’t happen in the [What were you THINKING? - #6737 by Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/6737) thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/14 "2026-02-27T16:53:16Z")

</div>

Warning, Pit Language, so I’ll dropdown and blur, because people may not want to read the initial exchange - Again Pit Language and insults:

> **AI post in the PIT, reply contains definite Pit Language**
>
> [What were you THINKING? - #6587 by msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/6587)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/15 "2026-02-27T16:55:43Z")

</div>

Me, I’d actually prefer a spoiler box so I know going in not to waste any of my time, but a quote box is acceptable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/16 "2026-02-27T16:56:20Z")

</div>

That is someone being angry at another poster, but it points to here:

> [@What were you THINKING?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-were-you-thinking/991532/6587):
>
> Well it was not my intent to insult anyone. So perhaps my choice of words was poor in using hyperbole to make an overly sweeping statement. I asked ChatGPT “is collecting things the sign of a disturbed mind” and here is what it responded (I assume there’s no SDMB policy against posting quotes from AI?): " No — collecting things is not inherently a sign of a disturbed mind. In fact, collecting is extremely common and usually psychologically healthy. What matters is how and why someone collect…

Is that correct?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/17 "2026-02-27T16:58:05Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> I don’t know that it should be in a quote box, per se. But it should be clear that you are posting something from AI somehow, whether it’s a quote box, or italicized, or in a collapsed spoiler box.

We wouldn’t need a new rule, no, we have an existing one, which this would be a modification of.

> **Artificial intelligence (AI).** AI-generated responses must be clearly marked as such. Do not use AI to generate entire posts. AI responses are often unreliable – if you use them as the primary source for your assertions, you’re likely to get a lot of flak on this board.

@what_exit, I accidently linked to the insult, hit the back link to see the post that started it. I’ll go correct.

ETA - Initial AI post now corrected, FTR, I think said poster did a reasonable job of confirming the source, though they apparently didn’t know the rule cited above and it did end up making nearly the entirety of the post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/18 "2026-02-27T17:00:26Z")

</div>

So it sounds like the rule already exists. Maybe it could use the suggestion that it either be in a Quote Box saying which AI or detail spoilers saying AI text.

I’m not sure @msmith537 's post is or isn’t clearly marked. He wrote:  
“I asked ChatGPT “is collecting things the sign of a disturbed mind” and here is what it responded” so probably counts as clearly marked.

On the other hand it is a long, probably too long quote from ChatGPT. I don’t care much about this issue and even I think that would have been far better hidden by the Detail spoiler tag.

If he was quoting anything not public domain, he would get a modnote about quoting more than fair use allows. I have no idea about ChatGPT rules and fair use. @Ed_Zotti made it clear in the rules that **“if you use them as the primary source for your assertions, you’re likely to get a lot of flak on this board.”**

So rule of thumb, is use AI minimally. Make sure you present it as such.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![susan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/susan/32/17537_2.png) [@susan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/susan)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/19 "2026-02-27T17:01:40Z")

</div>

I agree. Also seeing some Facebook posts (also possibly AI) reproduced with no indication they’re not the poster’s words. A general reitteration that anything you didn’t write needs to be attributed and clearly marked would help.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)
#### Post date: [February 27, 2026, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051/20 "2026-02-27T17:04:16Z")

</div>

I have no problems with at least making it a “best practices” option, _especially_ in more serious threads. The rule as stands says “clearly marked” and this would be a good way to do it, though of course, the final call is in @Ed_Zotti’s hands.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/proposed-rule-cut-and-paste-from-ai-must-be-in-quote-box/1028051.md?page=2)
