I’ll repost what I wrote in another thread
Which “AI”, whether it was a “new chat” on not, and exactly what the query was. Because it’s known that a continuing session can result in the “AI” answering questions in ways that are less than accurate.
It all depends. Say you use a Al Jazeera or Israel news item for the war? going on. Both of those are biased, but trying to find a neutral cite might be difficult. And the NY Post can be right, and is sometimes entertaining, but warn people.
Wikipedia is sometimes a bit off on some controversial news item, but by and large, it is fine for stuff like “Nations in order of Population” or “crime rate” ect. In fact, IMHO wiki is about as good as any other cite- they do give references, you know.
Just an FYI to the thread, both @What_Exit and myself have started editing posts with AI content along the lines of the discussions above. Namely, the particular AI source is being bolded, and the AI specific text/quote being placed in a quote box. Again, a best practice way to comply with the TOS rules above. And so far, only in P&E and GD for myself (duh).
I have done my best to NOT otherwise edit the quote content beyond the above, though I did do some minor formatting changes (generally just placing stuff on it’s own line) to improve the distinction. Please feel free to leave polite feedback if you think it helps, hurts, or is an abomination unto Og.
If we’re not actively reading a thread, we’re not going to notice these AI quotes. So we’ll need flags and such.
The examples I’ve seen of your edit work so far are clear and obvious, yet ubobtrusive.
We (y’all really) aren’t going to satisfy the folks who wish AI content was banned. But as an exercise in truth in labeling, it’s a winner.
Looks good to me.
I like it.
What I like about it is that by bolding the source (the AI engine) and putting the quote in a quote box, it makes it explicit where it’s from and what exactly came from it.
Maybe next week, we’ll pin the instructions for a week like I just did for the new tag.
I’m currently composing a post. I pasted in an AI summary but can’t get it in a quote box.
I’ve tried [ quote ] and < quote > (without the spaces) with no luck. Help?
I’m out right now so on my phone.
Easiest way on most devices is to highlight the text with your mouse finger or other pointer and then hit the quote icon in the editing bar. (With bold, italic, link, etc is)
Oops, never mind - I got it.
Thanks
You can just start the paragraph you are quoting with a > character and it turns into a quote. That’s the super easy way to do it.
> This is a quote Becomes:
This is a quote.
Cool! Thanks.
Using the toolbar is easiest, and typing > is next easiest.
But sometimes the [quote] tag is easier for multiple paragraphs with bullets, and it still works. The trick is you need to have the starting and ending tag on their own lines.
So:
[quote]
This is a quote!
This is still part of the quote!
[/quote]
This is no longer part of the quote.Becomes:
This is no longer part of the quote.
This is the secret. Make sure there is no other text in the same line as either quote tag and it should work.
Aaah, thank you!