Greetings,
JRDelirio here, Puerto Rico’s branch of alt.fan.cecil-adams (as quoted in The Straight Dope Tells All) With what I think I know on this, FWIMBW to y’all:
(a) The 16 FALN members (of which 11 were released) were convicted of “seditious conspiracy” on top of common charges ranging from bank robbery to interstate transport of stolen goods to gunrunning to simple criminal conspiracy. SedCon added something like 30 years to their sentences.
(b) SedCon is a charge that is hardly ever used. It is claimed, though I’d like to see the corroboration, that at the time it had only been used against the FALN in modern times, i.e, not even the Klan, Panthers, Weathermen, SLA, etc. had got hit with it in the prior 50+ years
© A consensus of public opinion around here was that yes, they are guilty of aiding and abetting violent subversive activity, BUT when any other bank robber or gunrunner affiliated to a violent gang that is responsible for drive-by shootings, murders and arsons, gets 10 to 20 w. time off for good behavior, why make it 50 to life only for this one gang 'cause it’s looking for “political” gain, rather than dope-pushing turf.
BTW the Feds let the two real hard-core terrorist masterminds just slip away (one was even let out on bail, which of course he jumped) YEARS ago and still can’t catch them.
(d) 9 of the 11 had their first parole-officer meeting yesterday and it seems that everything will be just fine and everyone is exceedingly willing to cooperate.
(e)<editorial> Bill had that parole offer on his desk since 1993. He could have waited for Thanksgiving week 2000 to sign it</editorial>.
(f) brief recount on US/PR political History:
Takeover after Span-Am war, 1898; lousy colonial government established 1900.
1917: slightly better version of colonial government established; US Citizenship extended to inhabitants on “take it or take it” basis while at the same time being made requisite for voting and public employment…
1930s-50s wave of nationalist violence and government repression, about evenly violent. Congressmen even threaten to declare PR independent w. NO aid whatsoever.
1st 40 yrs of US rule WERE marked by crude naked exploitation. Sanitation improved some, bit otherwise the masses went to pot.
1940s War and New Deal start pumping the economy.
1940-48 New local leadership starts land reforms, locals replace Anglos in most top Gov’t positions
1950-52. Original nationalist insurrection peaks and is crushed. US offers PR to adopt current semi-autonomous Commonwealth Constitution, in take-it-or-leave-it vote; NOT choice of independence or statehood. (At the time Pro-Independence parties were more numerous than pro-statehooders) Overwhelming majority says yes to Commonwealth. Apart from keeping the pre-existing tax exemption, it’s sorta like a State, but with no vote on anything Federal and Congress retains the right to legislate over us.
1950s-60s Boom Times. Economy blossoms. Independence movement turns leftist (hey, it was the fashion), gets on bad side of Gay Edgar Hoover; collapses from height of 33% to low of 3% of electorate. Meanwile statehood movement rises to replace them as 2nd force in electorate (hey, if quasi-statehood is so good, then…)
1973 OPEC Recession. Bubble bursts. Economy has sorta muddled on ever since
1990s Renaissance of cultural-identity nationalism in media and academia, <editorial> mostly in in reaction to dominance of business/govt establishment by pro-american types </editorial>.
The one and only binding, federally mandated vote that carried with it a commitment to results was the one in the early 50s on Commonwealth: take-or-leave
Three locally called status referenda have been called:
1967: 65% improve on statu-quo, 35% Statehood, independence boycotted
1993: 48% improve commonwealth; 46.5% Statehood, 4.5% Independence,
–1993 Court Decision: You must include “None of the Above” option in future referenda –
1998: 50% NOTA, 46.5% Statehood, 2.5% Independence; pro-commonwealth and dissident pro-independence factions deliberately voted with NOTA in protest over “prejudiced” ballot wording.
Attempts to move thru a federally-mandated all-options referendum in 1989-91 and 1995-98 were all torpedoed in US Senate after rough time in US House: consensus of observers say it is due to unwillingness of Congress to commit to giving us what we ask for, and especially to offer statehood “for the asking”.
Statehood seems to have plateaued just short of a majority, Independentism is struggling, and the bare majority is trying to figure out just exactly what would be a right, fair arrangement that avoids recriminations and “paybacks”, maintains a state of peace, civil liberties, a high (by Caribbean standards) standard of living, cultural identity, integration to US economic sphere and free movement between the Island and US Puerto Rican communities: Even if it does mean paying a greater share of some of the Federal services here, but conversely with greater freedom from an overbearing Congress.
No Federal personal**income tax on locally-generated income may seem nice [we pay plenty of other taxes PLUS just as much income tax as we would to the US, only to the logal treasury], but with no vote in Congress or the Electoral College you’re kinda naked when they start looking for whom to sock it to.
(g) major problem w. military right now is not so much large scale of overall activity, but specifically Vieques Island. Inhabited area, 2/3 of it is used as Naval Weapons range. High pollution level, lousy economy, loose ordnance injures folks every so often, last April a civilian got killed when he got bombed by mistake. Brass has been acting really ignorant when called to account for themselves. Other than Vieques the only ones with a problem are the usual complainers (yes, 10% of the land is considered “US Reservation”, but over half of that is for the use of our own NatGuard and is mostly open fields, or is Corps of Engineers wetlands). Could be different tale if the draft were back, then it would really piss people off to have no vote on it.
José
There will be a test on all this worth 25% of your grade
DISCLOSURE: The Author is employed by the Puerto Rico House of Representatives and is himself nominally affiliated with a party that has statehood in its platform.