# Question about British English and some lack of "the" and "a"?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [June 23, 2013, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734 "2013-06-23T22:30:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 19\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2013, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/81 "2013-06-27T23:30:39Z")

</div>

> [@RobDog](#):
>
> I can’t find that expression anywhere in my Kindle edition, are you sure it’s in Uncle F in the S?

I believe it was in a different Wodehouse novel after all, maybe _Let Psmith Do It_–which I also seem to have lost! (The number of books I have “lost” in recent years, despite having no recollection of intentionally donating or discarding them, mounts and mounts.) However, the passage exists somewhere in Wodehouse and the dialog is between Lady Constance Keeble and Rupert (“The Efficient”) Baxter. IIRC it’s connected in some way with the throwing of flowerpots.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 12:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/82 "2013-06-28T00:22:35Z")

</div>

> [@Noel\_Prosequi](#):
>
> American legalese provides counter examples. A judgment may say something like “Plaintiff seeks relief from Defendant’s behaviour bla bla…”. Commonwealth lawyers would put “the” before plaintiff and defendant. The lack of articles looks odd to our eyes.

Do you capitalize the words Plaintiff and Defendant? That might have something to do with the American practice; by capitalizing those words, they become proper nouns in a way, like names. IANAL so I don’t know what’s customary in this regard. But in terms of how I perceive the language, either of these look slightly odd to me:

> [@](#):
>
> (1)…the Plaintiff seeks relief from the Defendant’s behavior…
> 
> (2) …plaintiff seeks relief from defendant’s behavior

in contrast to:

> [@](#):
>
> (3)…Plaintiff seeks relief from Defendant’s behavior
> 
> (4)…the plaintiff seeks relief from the defendant’s behavior

(All examples are assumed not to be the beginning of the sentence.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 12:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/83 "2013-06-28T00:31:47Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> I have an example that will sound stranger to Americans than any of the foregoing, and it may be obsolete by now in the UK. It’s from a P.G. Wodehouse novel, _Uncle Fred In The Springtime_, published in 1939. A character in the story leans out over a windowsill, overbalances, and falls to the earth outside. On being asked about it later he says he was “jumping out of window”. To which Lady Constance seems mildly shocked and says, "Jumping out of _window_, as if wondering why he didn’t choose a more normal place to jump out of.
> 
> Is this expression still current anywhere?

No way is that normal British English, and I do not believe that it ever was. Like most of the other examples of the British allegedly not using articles where Americans would have them (“Put kettle on.”:rolleyes:), it is just wrong. It sounds as odd to my British ears as it no doubt does to your American ones. If it not your memory that is at fault, I would suggest that the most likely explanation is a typographical error in the book.

Wodehouse characters, of course, do have their own peculiar dialect, one that, probably, no real British person ever spoke. That is part of the humor. However, this is so deviant from ordinary British English that I do not believe Wodehouse would have deliberately put it into the mouth of one of his characters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpyOne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/82dd89/32.png) [@SpyOne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SpyOne)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 5:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/84 "2013-06-28T05:38:03Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> \*\*Grrrrrr!!!\*\*Just noticed “on air”, too.

Well, “SCTV is now on the air!”, but the red sign at the back of every radio studio I’ve ever seen on tv simply says “ON AIR”, so …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19b73/32.png) [@Jragon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jragon)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 8:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/85 "2013-06-28T08:04:07Z")

</div>

> [@Living\_Well\_Is\_Best\_Revenge](#):
>
> Oh I hate when Americans say “I’m on holiday” too. Um, no you’re not. You are on vacation.
> 
> Did you also take the “lift”? Stop for “petrol” on the way home from work?

Here in Tucson, there’s actually a gas station downtown that has the word “petrol” in its name and all its prices and pumps and stuff. The weird thing is it’s not British themed or anything, it’s almost offensively trying to pander to Southwest American culture (as much as the southwest has a distinct culture). I’ve always wanted to ask what was up with that.

I’ve heard “lift” used in the US before for “elevator”, but usually only specific elevators. While saying “I’m taking the lift” is odd, I wouldn’t bat an eye at “maintenance lift” or “freight lift”. Though I hotel in LA I stayed at on Monday insisted on using “lift” to mean **escalator** , cue me wandering around for 5 minutes trying to find the damned elevator they were telling me to use until they pointed me to the escalator.

> [@SpyOne](#):
>
> “Going to Homecoming” I have heard. “Going to prom” is something I hadn’t ever heard until it came up on an episode of Teen Titans where the speaker was clearly unfamiliar with the phrase. I went to _the_ prom. I went to two of them: the Junior Prom, and then the Senior Prom.  
> If my school has held Homecoming, I probably wouldn’t have attended, but I might have gone to the Homecoming dance. 🙂

I’ve heard “going to prom” a lot, and it always bugs me. To me it’s “THE prom”, but you mention Homecoming, and oddly I would go “to Homecoming” not “the Homecoming” or “the Homecoming dance” (though I may use the latter for disambiguation with the football game preceding it). On the other hand, I’d go to **the** Winter Ball, not just “Winter Ball”. This is all very odd and arbitrary.

As for “the university” in English, I’d rarely say it. It’s sort of an in group/out group distinction. 90% of the time when I refer to any location near the university around here I’ll say it’s “on campus” or “near campus.” The “University” part is generally implied. The only time I might say “University” is if I was talking to a tourist or posting on a board like this where I’d say “near the university in town” and say “near the university” for brevity. I may also be more specific if I’m talking to a student enrolled in high school or a community college just so they don’t think I’m talking about **their** campus. I don’t think I’d just say “university” for any other purpose.

I don’t watch the Big Bang Theory, but from what was said here, if all the parties in the conversation were familiar with Caltech, and the speaker worked there, it would sound off to say they’re going “to the university” or even “to the institute”. Just “I’m heading off to campus” or “I’m going to campus” sounds more natural to me, even if other colleges are around, the one the speaker works at seems implied to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malden\_Capell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/malden_capell/32/5274_2.png) [@Malden\_Capell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malden_Capell)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 8:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/86 "2013-06-28T08:34:38Z")

</div>

I’ve always wondered about a very similar thing in American English which sounds very odd to a UKian like myself:

American English:

> [@](#):
>
> Write your Congressman.

Queen’s English:

> [@](#):
>
> Write **to** your MP.

Where’d the ‘to’ go in the US? The sentence sounds to me like you’re writing the words ‘your Congressman’, or funnier yet, writing on the poor person’s face.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19b73/32.png) [@Jragon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jragon)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 8:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/87 "2013-06-28T08:42:29Z")

</div>

I think the UK does use that construction for “call” and “phone” though, right? E.G. “Remember to call/phone your mom.” (“call her what?” :p)

I wonder if the US just took it further for another form of communication (though then why don’t we use “talk your mom” rather than “talk to your mom”? Who knows).

ETA: It might be an extension of “contact” e.g. “contact your MP/Congressman” which should be fine in both countries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malden\_Capell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/malden_capell/32/5274_2.png) [@Malden\_Capell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malden_Capell)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 8:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/88 "2013-06-28T08:51:31Z")

</div>

‘Talk your mom’ sounds like something which ought to be banned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpeedwayRyan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@SpeedwayRyan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SpeedwayRyan)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 4:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/89 "2013-06-28T16:13:04Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> BTW we need to be sure not to include in this discussion phrases in what they used to call telegraphic English, and still widely seen in newspaper headlines. The omission of articles in such contexts is completely typical in America, e.g. “Blackhawks win Cup”, “Area Man Falls Out Of Window”, and so on.

My grandmother, who is 80, uses this approach on Facebook. I remember her using it when writing postcards and informal letters when I was a kid. She never uses it when speaking, just to minimize writing/typing.

Took dog to vet today.

Picture of John at birthday party.

Stuff like that. Like I said, it really reminds me of her postcards that she used to send me…they really had that “telegraph” feel to them in terms of leaving out articles. I wonder if this was pretty common back in her day…not a ton of 80 year olds on my Facebook friends list to compare her to (she’s a pretty high-tech lady, has an iPhone and a laptop!)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2013, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/90 "2013-06-28T17:21:06Z")

</div>

> [@SpyOne](#):
>
> Well, “SCTV is now on the air!”, but the red sign at the back of every radio studio I’ve ever seen on tv simply says “ON AIR”, so …

Those are electric signs, though. The wording on signs is usually constrained by space limitations, so the telegraphic style comes into play.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2013, 8:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/91 "2013-06-29T08:57:28Z")

</div>

“Leave it to Psmith” contains the flowerpot episode, I believe. Baxter is locked outside at night and starts throwing flowerpots to attract attention. He hits the Earl of Emsworth, who concludes Baxter is potty and refuses to re- hire him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![choie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/choie/32/7829_2.png) [@choie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/choie)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2013, 9:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/92 "2013-06-29T09:31:36Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> If it not your memory that is at fault, I would suggest that the most likely explanation is a typographical error in the book.
> 
> Wodehouse characters, of course, do have their own peculiar dialect, one that, probably, no real British person ever spoke. That is part of the humor. However, this is so deviant from ordinary British English that I do not believe Wodehouse would have deliberately put it into the mouth of one of his characters.

If it’s a typo it’s showing up in a helluva lot of Wodehouse.

From _Mike_:

> [@](#):
>
> “Nothing that happens in this luny-bin,” said Psmith, “has power to surprise me now. There was a time when I might have thought it a little unusual to have to leave the house through a canvas shoot at one o’clock in the morning, but I suppose it’s quite the regular thing here. Old school tradition, &c. Men leave the school, and find that they’ve got so accustomed to **jumping out of window** that they look on it as a sort of affectation to go out by the door. I suppose none of you merchants can give me any idea when the next knockabout entertainment of this kind is likely to take place?”

From “The Heart of a Goof”:

> [@](#):
>
> She had a habit of sniffing in a significant way whenever she looked at him, and this can never make for a spirit of easy comradeship between man and woman. Given a free hand, he would have tied a brick to her neck and dropped her in the water-  
> hazard at the second ; but, realising that this was but a Utopian dream, he sensibly decided to make the best of things and to content himself with **jumping out of window** whenever she came into a room in which he happened to be sitting.

And finally, the quote **Spectre** was discussing, which is actually from _Summer Lightning_ (1929):

> [@](#):
>
> ‘May I come in?’ he said curtly. He could explain, but he did not wish to do so on the first floor landing of a house where almost anybody might be listening with flapping ears.
> 
> ‘But, Mr Baxter!’ said Lady Constance.
> 
> He paused for a moment to grit his teeth, then closed the door.
> 
> ‘What _have_ you been doing, Mr Baxter?’
> 
> ‘Jumping out of window.’
> 
> ‘Jumping out of _win_-dow?’

Here’s [the direct Google Books Link to the phrase in _Summer Lightning_](http://books.google.com/books?id=WpRRzvWUUmwC&lpg=PA194&ots=H3nQ4DJvwF&dq=%22jumping%20out%20of%20window%22%20wodehouse&pg=PA194#v=onepage&q=%22jumping%20out%20of%20window%22%20wodehouse&f=false).

So… yeah. Apparently it was one of Wodehouse’s quirks! Or maybe not. I just did a wider Google Book search and found the phrase, not in telegram / truncated context, in several books pre-1920, for example from this nonfiction epic by Thomas Carlyle from 1858:

> [@History of Friedrich II of Prussia](#):
>
> …And, in fact, she disdained the simplicity of dress which her part required;–as did the chief actress," Du Chatelet herself (age now forty-one); “who, in playing PIGGERY, preferred the interests of her own face to those of the Piece, and made her entry in all the splendor and elegant equipments of a Court Lady,”–her “PRINCIPLES,” though the key is turned upon them, not unlike **jumping out of window,** one would say!

Oh, one would, would one? I fear one would sound very odd saying it now. 🙂

(Though I’m surprised that no one offered the most likely potential typo, which would’ve been simply leaving off an ‘s’ – “jumping out of window_s_” is perfectly cromulent.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RobDog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f07891/32.png) [@RobDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RobDog)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2013, 10:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/93 "2013-06-29T10:32:32Z")

</div>

> [@choie](#):
>
> If it’s a typo it’s showing up in a helluva lot of Wodehouse.  
> [Snip lots of examples]

Well I’ll go t’foot of our stairs!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 8:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/94 "2013-07-12T20:45:51Z")

</div>

> [@choie](#):
>
> If it’s a typo it’s showing up in a helluva lot of Wodehouse.
> 
> From _Mike_:
> 
> From “The Heart of a Goof”:
> 
> And finally, the quote **Spectre** was discussing, which is actually from _Summer Lightning_ (1929):
> 
> Here’s [the direct Google Books Link to the phrase in _Summer Lightning_](http://books.google.com/books?id=WpRRzvWUUmwC&lpg=PA194&ots=H3nQ4DJvwF&dq=%22jumping%20out%20of%20window%22%20wodehouse&pg=PA194#v=onepage&q=%22jumping%20out%20of%20window%22%20wodehouse&f=false).
> 
> So… yeah. Apparently it was one of Wodehouse’s quirks! Or maybe not. I just did a wider Google Book search and found the phrase, not in telegram / truncated context, in several books pre-1920, for example from this nonfiction epic by Thomas Carlyle from 1858:
> 
> Oh, one would, would one? I fear one would sound very odd saying it now. 🙂
> 
> (Though I’m surprised that no one offered the most likely potential typo, which would’ve been simply leaving off an ‘s’ – “jumping out of window_s_” is perfectly cromulent.)

Your exhaustive research is appreciated, I missed this until now.

I wonder if “out of window” was an upper-class dialect expression of the early 20th Century, as Wodehouse’s heritage was decidedly of the aristocracy.

Curiously enough, I just came across another typo in _Pigs Have Wings_. As Jerry Vail, sometime occupant of the Blandings Castle secretarial chair, he is pleased to learn that the cottage he has just rented was recently vacated by his old friend Admiral J. G. Biffen; if he could go by the notorious tidiness of _navel_ men then he could be sure Biffen left everything in “apple pie order”. Perhaps the Admiral raised oranges on the fantail of his battleship. I don’t know, though, I thought running a fruit ranch tended to be a bit on the dirty side…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/95 "2013-07-12T20:53:35Z")

</div>

> [@half-elf](#):
>
> Re: washing, the American usage which sounds strange to my ears is saying “wash up” in a context other than washing plates & utensils, i.e. when referring to washing one’s hands or face.

For me it’s exactly the opposite. “Wash up” means to wash _yourself_. If you want me to was something else, give me an object – “Wash the dishes.” Better yet, “Do the dishes.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Great\_Cornholio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ed8c4c/32.png) [@The\_Great\_Cornholio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Great_Cornholio)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/96 "2013-07-12T21:46:31Z")

</div>

> [@Springtime\_for\_Spacers](#):
>
> Where I grew up, in NE Hampshire (urban SE England) a lot of people would say they were going “Up the town” meaning to the town centre but this was decried as “common” by those who spoke RP. Now I get on a bus and ask for a ticket for (t’)City meaning the city centre.

Have you ever encountered any confusion over where “town” is? I live in the Midlands, and remember my Dad mentioning to one of his mates, who comes from down South, that he was going “up into town” to Regent Street. The friend was convinced he meant London (many British towns have Oxford and Regent Streets and London Roads) even though we’d refer to that as “going down London” rather than calling it “Town”.

Anyway, the upshot was that we learned that there are still people here who refer to London as “Town”, and the place they lived as “the town”. You’d think it was the other way round, really, that London would be The Town, wouldn’t you?

> [@choie](#):
>
> Gosh, if “down the pub” makes you outraged, this’ll probably give you a coronary: One fellow says the phrase in _his_ locality (Nottingham) is increasingly being truncated to “go pub” or “I went Asda.” So now even “down” is being removed!

That’s common in Leicestershire and Derbyshire too (“common” in more than one sense of the word!).  
When you’ve heard a gaggle of local lasses in a pub, loudly talking about “gwin’ bed nah” (going to bed now) etc, it drives you a special kind of mental.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Claverhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/13edae/32.png) [@Claverhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Claverhouse)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/97 "2013-07-12T23:39:37Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> Your exhaustive research is appreciated, I missed this until now.
> 
> I wonder if “out of window” was an upper-class dialect expression of the early 20th Century, as Wodehouse’s heritage was decidedly of the aristocracy.

I’d suggest earlier than that. I grew up on Wodehouse, from the age of 11 or 12 on; however, concurrently, I grew up in both Edwardian England — Saki, Bennett, Wells, Hitchens, Jacobs, most of whom were — mildly — more obsessed with upper class _mores_ than those of the lower classes except as a mixture of shocked sympathy and careful amusement rather like children giggling at the zoo beholding bright blue hindquarters of certain apes; and even grew up in the late Victorian era previous, reading such as Mrs. Henry Wood, Conan Doyle, Butler, Wilde etc. — nothing you will note, very strenuous or intellectual. A construction such as ‘out of window’ would not have seemed strange at all ( particularly in William de Morgan [the designer] portraying middle-class Londoners from the 1850s on, or in Robert Hitchens satirising the upper classes etc. ), and I’d place it as probable in the 18th century on, when many upper class dialects pronounced _yellow_ as _yallah_ etc. and had many shibboleths to trap the unwary, and purposefully progressed to further and further stiltedness during the 19th century in order to emphasise both distance from those even slightly beneath and manly indifference.  
In the other hand, not being from that class, for about ten years I imagined another Wodehouse phrase ‘_he died trying to leap a five-bar gate_’ to mean the old gentleman was taking a running jump at the time,like a gymnast going over the bar, rather than that he was mounted on a horse for hunting and went over the field gate badly.

We are cut off progressively by each past becoming more and more that _different country_. How many children today kindle a coal fire in the grate ? Not just a lost skill, will they recognise what a poker and tongs are for in a museum ?

> [@choie](#):
>
> This usage seems to differ from the “There’s trouble down at t’ mill” (to use another _Monty Python_ sketch as an example, oy, can I do anything but quote UK comedies?), where I can hear the sort of hesitation between “at” and “mill” where the word “the” would go.

‘ **Trouble at t’mill** ’ is an old and definite literary genre in itself, long predating the Pythons, set in the North and whose hey day would have been the 1910s to 20s, but which probably extended back to Mrs. Gaskell but which went on to Thomas Armstrong ( now forgotten ) up to the 1950s. Necessary elements were striking factory workers [mill means factory in this context]; a fire at the factory; possibly a faithful dog belonging to either the employer or an honest worker or a brutish scoundrel.

Beyond the reach of non-British people — just as half of American or any other nation’s unspoken tradition is beyond our reach — Bill Tidy’s comic strip _The Fosdyke Saga_ sent up this kind of thing something rotten.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mean_mr.mustard/32/3865_2.png) [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mean_Mr.Mustard)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2013, 12:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/98 "2013-07-13T12:28:27Z")

</div>

I was angry at a British bloke once, told him to go to the hell.  
mmm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Springtime\_for\_Spacers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Springtime\_for\_Spacers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Springtime_for_Spacers)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2013, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734/99 "2013-07-13T14:16:55Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Great\_Cornholio](#):
>
> Have you ever encountered any confusion over where “town” is? I live in the Midlands, and remember my Dad mentioning to one of his mates, who comes from down South, that he was going “up into town” to Regent Street. The friend was convinced he meant London (many British towns have Oxford and Regent Streets and London Roads) even though we’d refer to that as “going down London” rather than calling it “Town”.
> 
> Anyway, the upshot was that we learned that there are still people here who refer to London as “Town”, and the place they lived as “the town”. You’d think it was the other way round, really, that London would be The Town, wouldn’t you?
> 
> That’s common in Leicestershire and Derbyshire too (“common” in more than one sense of the word!).  
> When you’ve heard a gaggle of local lasses in a pub, loudly talking about “gwin’ bed nah” (going to bed now) etc, it drives you a special kind of mental.

I only ever heard the use of “town” to mean London in books, said by people who would only do their serious shopping/culture/socialising there.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-british-english-and-some-lack-of-the-and-a/661734.md?page=4)
