# Question about Edmund in King Lear Popular misunderstanding of illegitimacy in Elizabethan England

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [October 28, 2022, 10:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914 "2022-10-28T10:35:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Octagon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/2acd7d/32.png) [@Octagon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Octagon)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 10:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/1 "2022-10-28T10:35:45Z")

</div>

Is our view of how Elizabethan audiences views illegitimacy largely incorrect ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Octagon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/2acd7d/32.png) [@Octagon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Octagon)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 10:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/2 "2022-10-28T10:42:08Z")

</div>

I’ve read views stating both a lot of tolerance for and intolerance for illegitimacy in Elizabethan England . Which is it? Would Shakespeare’s audiences have sympathized with the character or thought of him as a pure villain unworthy of being called a tragic villain as he is today ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 11:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/3 "2022-10-28T11:55:37Z")

</div>

> [@Octagon](#):
>
> Is our view of how Elizabethan audiences views illegitimacy largely incorrect

Here’s a book you might like:

> **[Illegitimate Power: Bastards... by Findlay, Alison](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Illegitimate-Power-Bastards-Renaissance-Drama/dp/0719080851)**
>
> Buy Illegitimate Power: Bastards in Renaissance Drama by Findlay, Alison (ISBN: 9780719080852) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.

> In Renaissance Drama, the bastard is an extraordinarily powerful and disruptive figure. We have only to think of Caliban or of Edmund to realise the challenge presented by the illegitimate child. Drawing on a wide range of play texts, Alison Findlay shows how illegitimacy encoded and threatened to deconstruct some of the basic tenets of patriarchal rule. She considers bastards as indicators and instigators of crises in early modern England, reading them in relation to witchcraft, spiritual insecurities and social unrest in family and State.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Octagon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/2acd7d/32.png) [@Octagon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Octagon)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 12:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/4 "2022-10-28T12:27:48Z")

</div>

Thanks bob\_2. I’m inclined not to view Edmund as a tragic figure. Edmund’s actions from the very beginning do not show any other mode of behavior other than ruthless ambition. He is the Machiavellian as interpreted in the popular sense of the word. Is it our relativism today that has softened our view of Edmund or am I looking at it all wrong ? I’m open to other opinions. Are we over analyzing Edmund ‘s complexity ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 10:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/5 "2022-10-30T10:06:28Z")

</div>

I think Shakespeare gets overanalysed all the time. He wrote pot-boilers for Elizabethan audiences and they were obviously fond of a bit of gore (Titus Andronicus.), sly sexual innuendo (Romeo and Juliet), and a few ghosts (if they are children so much the better) to scare the ladies (Richard111).

I did Julius Caesar for English Lit, and had to write pages and pages about the “Significance of the supernatural”, or “Is Brutus really a tragic hero?”. I often thought that The Bard himself would probably have failed those exams.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tatterdemalion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/43a26b/32.png) [@Tatterdemalion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tatterdemalion)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 10:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/6 "2022-10-30T10:14:10Z")

</div>

You would not be the first to think that.

> **[The Immortal Bard](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Immortal_Bard)**
>
> "The Immortal Bard" is a science fiction short story by American writer Isaac Asimov. It was first published in the May 1954 issue of Universe Science Fiction, and has since been republished in several collections and anthologies, including Earth Is Room Enough (1957) and The Best Science Fiction of Isaac Asimov (1986). (In Earth Is Room Enough (Panther Books Ltd. reprint 1973 edition) the title of the story is "An Immortal Bard" in the Contents list but "The Immortal Bard" on the destination pa...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morgyn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/morgyn/32/3041_2.png) [@Morgyn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Morgyn)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/7 "2022-10-30T22:05:52Z")

</div>

I’ve often thought that any author confronted with a literary analysis of something they’d written, with its exposition of underlying themes and metaphors and symbolism and the like, would find themselves slack jawed in astonishment.

“Look, you, I was just trying to write a good story that would entertain people and earn me some money. I don’t know where you’re getting all that nonsense, but it certainly wasn’t anything I was thinking about when I was writing it!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/8 "2022-10-30T22:48:32Z")

</div>

Haven’t read much James Joyce recently? 🙂  
[![](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/65/bb/3b/65bb3b59dda7cb09e0f44097b39a6374.jpg) ](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/65/bb/3b/65bb3b59dda7cb09e0f44097b39a6374.jpg)  
But even hard-working authors who can crank out a novel in a year or even less put some degree of conscious (and unconscious—they are already well versed in those themes and metaphors) planning into it; you can’t really write well otherwise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morgyn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/morgyn/32/3041_2.png) [@Morgyn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Morgyn)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2022, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-edmund-in-king-lear-popular-misunderstanding-of-illegitimacy-in-elizabethan-england/973914/9 "2022-10-31T03:40:09Z")

</div>

The only thing I’ve ever read by Joyce was _Portrait of the Artist_, and I didn’t like it at all. It didn’t feel like he was trying to tell a story, it felt like he was trying to show off how clever and intelligent he was, and how nonconformist he was.
