# Question about UV light from my 1st grader

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 20, 2017, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356 "2017-02-20T22:18:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![busmol](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@busmol](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/busmol)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/1 "2017-02-20T22:18:15Z")

</div>

So my daughter never ceases to amaze me with her questions. She asked if she had a marker that only writes in UV, and she wrote on a white sheet of paper, what color (if any) would you see?

My gut reaction was to say a bluish/violet, but the more I think about it, would you see nothing since true UV is beyond our sight limits?

What does the Dope say?

(BTW this is the first thread I’ve ever started, but she tries to stump me on a regular basis. Thanks to the Dope she thinks her dad is one of the smartest humans alive! Who am I to tell her different?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/2 "2017-02-20T22:29:24Z")

</div>

[UV marker](https://www.amazon.com/Sharpie-Invisible-Ink-Marking-Marker/dp/B000UH0MZG)  
Says it’s invisible in regular light, blue under UV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MindsEye\_Watering](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mindseye_watering/32/3619_2.png) [@MindsEye\_Watering](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MindsEye_Watering)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/3 "2017-02-20T22:31:35Z")

</div>

> [@busmol](#):
>
> So my daughter never ceases to amaze me with her questions. She asked if she had a marker that only writes in UV, and she wrote on a white sheet of paper, what color (if any) would you see?
> 
> My gut reaction was to say a bluish/violet, but the more I think about it, would you see nothing since true UV is beyond our sight limits?
> 
> What does the Dope say?
> 
> (BTW this is the first thread I’ve ever started, but she tries to stump me on a regular basis. Thanks to the Dope she thinks her dad is one of the smartest humans alive! Who am I to tell her different?)

I’m pretty sure that there are UV inks that are perfectly clear until the ink is illuminated with a UV light.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thelurkinghorror](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7c8e57/32.png) [@thelurkinghorror](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thelurkinghorror)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/4 "2017-02-20T22:33:40Z")

</div>

Natural light is rarely monochromatic, so a light could be most UV and still appear violet or blue because it spans a wide enough range, we just see a small part of it. Similarly with inks and dyes, it depends on whether it reflects only UV, in which case it’s invisible to humans, or else it bleeds into the visible range.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/5 "2017-02-20T22:42:58Z")

</div>

_So_ disappointed that the UV light isn’t being emitted by your first-grader…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![busmol](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@busmol](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/busmol)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/6 "2017-02-20T22:43:03Z")

</div>

> [@running\_coach](#):
>
> [UV marker](https://www.amazon.com/Sharpie-Invisible-Ink-Marking-Marker/dp/B000UH0MZG)  
> Says it’s invisible in regular light, blue under UV.

Thanks! I looked it up, but went about it in a totally bassackward way! Never thought to actually look up a UV marker!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whitetho](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whitetho/32/1059_2.png) [@whitetho](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/whitetho)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/7 "2017-02-20T22:46:36Z")

</div>

This topic has come up a few times before. The main reason we can’t see near ultraviolet is because the eye’s cornea blocks UV light. However, some early cornea replacements were transparent to UV light. The unimpressive findings were that UV just looks whitish-blue or whitish-violet. When my father had cataract surgery, I asked him about this, but he said the doctors told him that modern cornea replacements are now designed to block UV rays.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![busmol](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@busmol](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/busmol)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/8 "2017-02-20T22:47:22Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> _So_ disappointed that the UV light isn’t being emitted by your first-grader…

She’s pretty bright…if anyone ever figures out how to emit UV light it would be her!

(Today she lectured me on why we use Latin names for animals and plants, instead of common names)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![busmol](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@busmol](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/busmol)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/9 "2017-02-20T22:49:59Z")

</div>

> [@whitetho](#):
>
> This topic has come up a few times before. The main reason we can’t see near ultraviolet is because the eye’s cornea blocks UV light. However, some early cornea replacements were transparent to UV light. The unimpressive findings were that UV just looks whitish-blue or whitish-violet. When my father had cataract surgery, I asked him about this, but he said the doctos told him that modern cornea replacements are now designed to block UV rays.

We (daughter and I ) read about this. She said she really wants to be able to see like the birds and the bugs, but doesn’t want to resort to surgery…yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chacoguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/50afbb/32.png) [@chacoguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chacoguy)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/10 "2017-02-20T22:51:50Z")

</div>

[UV tattoos.](http://www.boredpanda.com/glow-in-dark-tattoos-uv-black-light/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/11 "2017-02-20T22:59:13Z")

</div>

You wouldn’t necessarily see anything.

Note that most stuff that’s visible under UV is fluorescent (like the linked markers)–which is to say that the dye takes in UV light and converts it to a frequency that we can see. So that doesn’t really count for these purposes.

Look at [these pictures of flowers](http://www.naturfotograf.com/UV_POTE_ANS.html). You would never know it from the visible light image, but there is hidden detail in UV.

To be clear, the colors they chose for the UV image are arbitrary–it’s impossible to say what this would “really look like” if you could see UV. The point is that the dyes that the flower used look identical in the (human) visible spectrum, but reflect differently in UV. Likewise, one could in principle have a marker that was invisible in visible light but reflected UV differently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/12 "2017-02-20T23:14:00Z")

</div>

> [@running\_coach](#):
>
> [UV marker](https://www.amazon.com/Sharpie-Invisible-Ink-Marking-Marker/dp/B000UH0MZG)  
> Says it’s invisible in regular light, blue under UV.

Typically, these things actually fluoresce in the visible band when excited by UV illumination - that’s why we can see them. A UV-coloured dye that only reflects UV light would appear black under normal visible illumination, whereas under invisible UV illumination, it would appear black, because we would not be able to see the invisible UV light being reflected off it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/13 "2017-02-20T23:27:37Z")

</div>

You need to start a conversation about what “a marker that writes in UV” means.

A “red” marker dispenses red ink, which blocks green and blue light, but transmits red light. Which is why the red light can pass through the ink, get reflected by the underlying paper, reflect back and make it to your eyes. All other colors get blocked by the ink. So the mark looks red.

If it’s a “UV marker” in the same sense, then it would block all visible light colors and transmit UV. We can’t see the UV, so it would just look black.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/14 "2017-02-20T23:34:47Z")

</div>

> [@running\_coach](#):
>
> [UV marker](https://www.amazon.com/Sharpie-Invisible-Ink-Marking-Marker/dp/B000UH0MZG)  
> Says it’s invisible in regular light, blue under UV.

As **Dr. Strangelove** said, this is a fluorescent marker. It absorbs UV and converts it to visible light. It’s not really a “UV marker” in the same sense of a “red marker.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thelurkinghorror](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7c8e57/32.png) [@thelurkinghorror](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thelurkinghorror)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2017, 11:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/15 "2017-02-20T23:35:19Z")

</div>

> [@whitetho](#):
>
> This topic has come up a few times before. The main reason we can’t see near ultraviolet is because the eye’s cornea blocks UV light. However, some early cornea replacements were transparent to UV light. The unimpressive findings were that UV just looks whitish-blue or whitish-violet. When my father had cataract surgery, I asked him about this, but he said the doctors told him that modern cornea replacements are now designed to block UV rays.

Cataracts involve the lens, not the cornea. Very right though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anaglyph](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ed8c4c/32.png) [@Anaglyph](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anaglyph)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2017, 9:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/16 "2017-02-21T09:37:53Z")

</div>

UV markers contain fluorescent dyes: They absorb light in the UV range, therefore not visible to the naked eye. However, when excited by UV light of the correct wavelength, they emit light in the visible range of the spectrum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2017, 11:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/17 "2017-02-21T11:24:24Z")

</div>

> [@scr4](#):
>
> You need to start a conversation about what “a marker that writes in UV” means.
> 
> A “red” marker dispenses red ink, which blocks green and blue light, but transmits red light. Which is why the red light can pass through the ink, get reflected by the underlying paper, reflect back and make it to your eyes. All other colors get blocked by the ink. So the mark looks red.
> 
> If it’s a “UV marker” in the same sense, then it would block all visible light colors and transmit UV. We can’t see the UV, so it would just look black.

We probably need to differentiate between transmission and reflection too (not that I disagree with anything you wrote). A ‘dye’ type red marker works as you describe above - a ‘paint’ type red marker appears red because it contains pigments that reflect red in their own right, and absorb everything else.

There’s probably also a third case for dyes that transmit some wavelengths and reflect others (in theory, such a thing, painted on glass, would appear red from the lit side and greenish blue when held up to the light and looked through.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jz78817](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jz78817/32/1028_2.png) [@jz78817](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jz78817)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2017, 11:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/18 "2017-02-21T11:55:15Z")

</div>

also, there’s a (small) chance such a marker wouldn’t be that discernable under a black light; a lot of paper has UV brighteners in it which make it look “more white” and also make it fluorescent when a UV light shines on it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2017, 12:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/19 "2017-02-21T12:16:39Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> We probably need to differentiate between transmission and reflection too (not that I disagree with anything you wrote). A ‘dye’ type red marker works as you describe above - a ‘paint’ type red marker appears red because it contains pigments that reflect red in their own right, and absorb everything else.
> 
> There’s probably also a third case for dyes that transmit some wavelengths and reflect others (in theory, such a thing, painted on glass, would appear red from the lit side and greenish blue when held up to the light and looked through.

Nothing “In Theory” about it.  
Try Mercurochrome - it works exactly as described.  
Such chemicals are “dichroic."

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2017, 12:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356/20 "2017-02-21T12:23:15Z")

</div>

> [@busmol](#):
>
> So my daughter never ceases to amaze me with her questions. She asked if she had a marker that only writes in UV, and she wrote on a white sheet of paper, what color (if any) would you see?
> 
> My gut reaction was to say a bluish/violet, but the more I think about it, would you see nothing since true UV is beyond our sight limits?
> 
> What does the Dope say?
> 
> (BTW this is the first thread I’ve ever started, but she tries to stump me on a regular basis. Thanks to the Dope she thinks her dad is one of the smartest humans alive! Who am I to tell her different?)

Her question is like the premise of the Ambrose Bierce story “The Damned Thing” about a monster that was infrared in color, and which therefore was invisible to human eyes.  
The problem is that you can have something that reflects in the ultraviolet or the infrared, it still has to do something with visible light, as well.

If your daughter’s pen writes in ink that doesn’t affect visible light, but does reflect UV, then it will be invisible to human eyes, but you could see it with an ultraviolet camera. The same goes for infrared (Bierce’s monster wouldn’t be invisible, though – a monster still has to do SOMETHING to visible light, unlike writing with your daughter’s pen) There are inks, in fact, that do exactly this – they’re used as anti-counterfeiting agents.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/question-about-uv-light-from-my-1st-grader/780356.md?page=2)
