Let’s see. Notorious drunken idiot Milum stops posting stuff like this about a week ago:
Beryl Mooncalf commences posting garbage, culminating with stuff like this:
Coincidence? Maybe. Don’t really think so, though.
You know, I kind of see this thread as your moment in the sun. Let your idiocy shine.
If you want to call me out, I humbly request that you show me the courtesy of beginning a new thread. Try to be creative and come up a more substantial gripe than this childishness.
Please, won’t anyone think of the giant squid children?
Giant squid children? Eh, it’s dark outside and I can’t see them. Here, shine a lighthouse this way so that I can get a better look…
Who’s gonna pay for that fucking lighthouse, SkipMagic?
Giant Squid Children Slave Labor, Desmostylus. We’ll coerce them into making Nike shoes for the rest of the Giant Squids. All those tentacles requiring all those shoes–that’s a lot of friggin’ lighthouses.
…The COURT of FIRST APPEAL,
…For the Hairy Pit of Plop,
…Southern District of Void Cerebellums
…Order on Motion for Addition to
…Credits & New Sentencing
…[.color]…Case No.000001
[color=white]…
…Advance sheet for Order on Motion Case 000001
Justice, Ima Crimescene, jj
-----------------------Revised CREDITS-9/21/03--------------------------
Random
co-signing = bad.
co-signing = top of this list New sentence.
rhum runner
Just a tard. A poor tard. It never pays to start flinging poop when you haven’t advanced sufficiently high on the evolutionary tree to do two things at once. Go lick John Wayne’s hairy saddlebags.
New sentencing
Nametag
You were (are) totally clueless. Devoid of form or function. Lacking purpose and direction, And those are your good points. Your outlook is tainted by your constant breathing through your anus. (Your ego is flatulent, a trouser trumpet, a booty bugle- get it you’re a few octaves short of a note, and
several notes short of a tune, Hard to play a tune on the one string banjo, A prosecutor would (duh) – if he were allowed to do so. Well said, although,… you and Pamela Handerson shouldn’t tickle the pickle while posting. That’s what Bricker was saying; that’s what makes this a double-jeopardy case. Yeah counselor, your school apparently didn’t require reading or math skills right? Really, If you would just try doing something other than a ME TOO approach, you
might have seen i the cleverly hidden (PATIENT) fact differently? Are you typically this careless/clueless in life?
Guess you don’t pay for your own error and omission coverage.
Recertification required.
andros
“Not even. I leaned all that in my 200-level Business Law course last year.” remanded. Sentence to Business Law 200r (what’s the “r” for? -Ohhhh)
(sorry, ya had the wrong lawyer.)
iampuna
dismissed, you’re free to go. (damn)
wring
pending
Captain Amazing
So, this entire thing is because Bricker, when writing his example, made a typo? You realize, he meant to say:
If my aunt had testes, I’d call her “uncle”. CA, Can you seriously imagine using “I made a typo, I meant to say…” after the fact here. I remember a proverb, Pride proceeds destruction,
like haughtiness a fall.…What did I just say?
Prov. xx
-Prosper and Enjoy.-
A person is guilty of mopery when, from the hours of 10 PM to 6 AM, it creeps on tip toes throuth the tulips
affirmed
Otto
“Hunting ain’t no fun when the rabbit got the SHOT gun”, eh… nuff said, remanded for re-sentencing - to consider age appropriate mitigation.
OxyMoron
Affirmed, suspended pending 100 hours pro bono.
Waverly
"doesn’t involve even the most remote knowledge of constitutional law. It’s a fucking logic question a 5th grader
If you want to call me out, I humbly request that you show me the courtesy of beginning a new thread. Try to be creative and come up a more substantial gripe than this childishness. Okay, were you wrong or lying? Let your idiocy shine look, i was just blinded by the glow of yours, nothing more.
Continue this? Arrrhhuh? Unfortunately, I made a pack last night with God, or someone, whoever was on duty then, that if the room ever stopped spinning, I would never again take lunch from 1PM to 9PM. It is going to be a long time, if ever, before I’ll be “eye to eye” with you again Waverly, because I’m
staying off the floor. Besides, You spewed crap, you wade in it.
remanded for new sentencing with appropriate enhancements.
Shayna
-they a have cure penis envy.
remanded for new sentencing.
TeaElle
“Whoo. I’ve never been in active legal practice and I could have given a better answer than Beryl’s.” "Whoo Whoo Whoo =“panty hamster air biscuit’s”, or “TeaElle requests servicing?”
remanded, New sentence with enhancements.
Jodi We need more Jodi’s in the world.
reversed. Ordered this day more Jodi’s from e-bay.
tomndebb…never would I have expected to see your mark here.
Libertarian…never would I have expected to see your mark here.
RETURN TO HEADING 270
Muffin Every time you say such evil things, an inch is added to your caboose. They say you’re getting real close to needing a second engine now.
pending
Geobabe I represent those remarks. but ghaude, it was…
…~.ººurp!ºº~
dismissed
SkipMagic
“polish the lighthouse” then your squid children will come pending
Dissonance
There’s five minutes of my life gone forever. It has been restored with interest. Spend it more wisely than you
have in the past.
pending
Ferret Herder
Beautiful meltdown, I agree. Plus that last post was a great… I think I got hold of some of your swill, Or more. Is that how you get a toothless sea lion for your very own?
unless I missed the “defense” in that muddle And Ms. Bestiality, It was my cut and paste that did that, but I was
in a hurry to get my methadone and then my welfare check, and of course, my unemployment check, and it is bad form, to drive the new benz to the unemployment office, so I had to go borrow a Ferret Herder to ride, The fugliest thing I ever rode, and smell, wow, like pavement pizza.
Referral to AA and ASPCA
Mr. B
Yes, but pointing that out might lend credence to the
“meltdown” for which “lend credence” = “earned credence” dude. You need to get out more, see the real world. Cheap shot? Playing by the rules?
pending
Desmostylus
G’day Sidney. The Honorable Pant Hamster from down under (real men climb on top Sydney) Been a while since I tossed a few shrimp on the barbie. Back when I had employment in a little southeast Asian country. Used to get your way 'bout 1 - 2 times a year I did, for 5 days at a time. Now why was it the local females would complained about the local mates then, oh, it was for not knowing how to set off the “fanny bomb”, instead of “floppin out”. I hope you not a “flop out” Sydney. your last post looked mighty flopped out Sydney. regards,
Coincidence you thinking?
no jurisdiction
Bricker,
Again, I hope you survived the problems, It looks like your absence is unintentional I’ll be leaving in 5 days for 8 days. I hope you are back up before then.
[Filing vacation affidavit here.]
…The COURT of FIRST APPEAL,
…For the Hairy Pit of Plop,
…Southern District of Void Cerebellums
…Order on Motion for Addition to
…Credits & New Sentencing
…[.color]…Case No.000001
[color=white]…
…Advance sheet for Order on Motion Case 000001
Justice, Ima Crimescene, jj
-----------------------Revised CREDITS-9/21/03--------------------------
Random
co-signing = bad.
co-signing = top of this list New sentence.
rhum runner
Just a tard. A poor tard. It never pays to start flinging poop when you haven’t advanced sufficiently high on the evolutionary tree to do two things at once. Go lick John Wayne’s hairy saddlebags.
New sentencing
Nametag
You were (are) totally clueless. Devoid of form or function. Lacking purpose and direction, And those are your good points. Your outlook is tainted by your constant breathing through your anus. (Your ego is flatulent, a trouser trumpet, a booty bugle- get it you’re a few octaves short of a note, and
several notes short of a tune, Hard to play a tune on the one string banjo, A prosecutor would (duh) – if he were allowed to do so. Well said, although,… you and Pamela Handerson shouldn’t tickle the pickle while posting. That’s what Bricker was saying; that’s what makes this a double-jeopardy case. Yeah counselor, your school apparently didn’t require reading or math skills right? Really, If you would just try doing something other than a ME TOO approach, you
might have seen i the cleverly hidden (PATIENT) fact differently? Are you typically this careless/clueless in life?
Guess you don’t pay for your own error and omission coverage.
Recertification required.
andros
“Not even. I leaned all that in my 200-level Business Law course last year.” remanded. Sentence to Business Law 200r (what’s the “r” for? -Ohhhh)
(sorry, ya had the wrong lawyer.)
iampuna
dismissed, you’re free to go. (damn)
wring
pending
Captain Amazing
So, this entire thing is because Bricker, when writing his example, made a typo? You realize, he meant to say:
If my aunt had testes, I’d call her “uncle”. CA, Can you seriously imagine using “I made a typo, I meant to say…” after the fact here. I remember a proverb, Pride proceeds destruction,
like haughtiness a fall.…What did I just say?
Prov. xx
-Prosper and Enjoy.-
A person is guilty of mopery when, from the hours of 10 PM to 6 AM, it creeps on tip toes throuth the tulips
affirmed
Otto
“Hunting ain’t no fun when the rabbit got the SHOT gun”, eh… nuff said, remanded for re-sentencing - to consider age appropriate mitigation.
OxyMoron
Affirmed, suspended pending 100 hours pro bono.
Waverly
"doesn’t involve even the most remote knowledge of constitutional law. It’s a fucking logic question a 5th grader
If you want to call me out, I humbly request that you show me the courtesy of beginning a new thread. Try to be creative and come up a more substantial gripe than this childishness. Okay, were you wrong or lying? Let your idiocy shine look, i was just blinded by the glow of yours, nothing more.
Continue this? Arrrhhuh? Unfortunately, I made a pack last night with God, or someone, whoever was on duty then, that if the room ever stopped spinning, I would never again take lunch from 1PM to 9PM. It is going to be a long time, if ever, before I’ll be “eye to eye” with you again Waverly, because I’m
staying off the floor. Besides, You spewed crap, you wade in it.
remanded for new sentencing with appropriate enhancements.
Shayna
-they a have cure penis envy.
remanded for new sentencing.
TeaElle
“Whoo. I’ve never been in active legal practice and I could have given a better answer than Beryl’s.” "Whoo Whoo Whoo =“panty hamster air biscuit’s”, or “TeaElle requests servicing?”
remanded, New sentence with enhancements.
Jodi We need more Jodi’s in the world.
reversed. Ordered this day more Jodi’s from e-bay.
tomndebb…never would I have expected to see your mark here.
Libertarian…never would I have expected to see your mark here.
RETURN TO HEADING 270
Muffin Every time you say such evil things, an inch is added to your caboose. They say you’re getting real close to needing a second engine now.
pending
Geobabe I represent those remarks. but ghaude, it was…
…~.ººurp!ºº
dismissed
SkipMagic
“polish the lighthouse” then your squid children will come pending
Dissonance
There’s five minutes of my life gone forever. It has been restored with interest. Spend it more wisely than you
have in the past.
pending
Ferret Herder
Beautiful meltdown, I agree. Plus that last post was a great… I think I got hold of some of your swill, Or more. Is that how you get a toothless sea lion for your very own?
unless I missed the “defense” in that muddle And Ms. Bestiality, It was my cut and paste that did that, but I was
in a hurry to get my methadone and then my welfare check, and of course, my unemployment check, and it is bad form, to drive the new benz to the unemployment office, so I had to go borrow a Ferret Herder to ride, The fugliest thing I ever rode, and smell, wow, like pavement pizza.
Referral to AA and ASPCA
Mr. B
Yes, but pointing that out might lend credence to the
“meltdown” for which “lend credence” = “earned credence” dude. You need to get out more, see the real world. Cheap shot? Playing by the rules?
pending
Desmostylus
G’day Sidney. The Honorable Pant Hamster from down under (real men climb on top Sydney) Been a while since I tossed a few shrimp on the barbie. Back when I had employment in a little southeast Asian country. Used to get your way 'bout 1 - 2 times a year I did, for 5 days at a time. Now why was it the local females would complained about the local mates then, oh, it was for not knowing how to set off the “fanny bomb”, instead of “floppin out”. I hope you not a “flop out” Sydney. your last post looked mighty flopped out Sydney. regards,
Coincidence you thinking?
no jurisdiction
Bricker,
Again, I hope you survived the problems, It looks like your absence is unintentional I’ll be leaving in 5 days for 8 days. I hope you are back up before then.
[Filing vacation affidavit here.]
What is it?
I press submit button, and 45 seconds later the connection times out, going to the "The page cannot be displayed The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings
I hit refresh, and when the connection is established again, the reply box still has “submit reply” text in it, but the post has double posted?
I had to delete the already posted text in this box to before adding this message?
Will this DP too…
Beryl_Mooncalf, thanks for the credit, but you’ve really got to stop this. You’re starting to lose your credibility, among other things, as aptly expressed by Otto. I had wanted to rise to your defense, but you’re sounding a little unstable – I think you should just claim agave and call it a week.
Everyone knows the Board’s gone loco. Your last post is beginning to hedge on manic.
BERYL, I appreciate your recognition of my honesty. Now, for the third time, I will tell you in all honesty that every time you post to this thread you do serious damage to the remaining shreds of your dignity and credibitilty, and make yourself look like more of an ass. (Which is really quite remarkable, since with every post you post I think “He couldn’t possibly look any more foolish and ignorant than this!” only to find with your next post that you have exceeded yourself.)
But here’s some FYIs for you:
-
Bricker is correct. You are wrong. You are so wrong you are the poster child for wrongness. Look up “wrong” in the dictionary and it says “see BERYL MOONCALF.” You not only live in Wrong Kong, you are the mayor, nay, the king.
-
At law, the plural includes the singular and the singular the plural; the feminine includes the masculine and the neuter, the masculine includes the feminine and the neuter; and the neuter includes the masculine and the feminine. (Unless context or explicit instruction indicates this general rule does not apply.) Therefore, “he” in a law includes “she,” “it,” and “they;” etc. etc. Therefore, even if BRICKER specified in his law “*he is found” (or whatever, I’m too lazy to look up the actual wording, plus I fear the server will crap out again), that does not add an element to the crime specifying that only males can commit the crime. Gender is rarely – never AFAIK – an element of a crime.
-
Kicking a case up to the Supreme Court for appeal does not add a second jurisdiction for purposes of considering double jeopardy, since the question (jurisdictionally speaking) is whether more than one jurisidiction will or can bring charges for the same crime or actions, and the Supreme Court does not bring charges, ever. Well, hardly ever. I suppose it’s theoretically possible for the Supremes to charge someone with something as a court of original jurisidiction, but I’m not aware of that ever happening. Certainly that ain’t what we’re talking about here. The only question regarding jurisdiction and the Supreme Court is whether the S.C. has jurisidiction to hear the appeal. This has nothing to do with multiple jurisdictions for double jeopardy purposes.
-
The plural of “Jodi” would be “Jodis,” not “Jodi’s,” unless you’re speaking of something belonging to me, like “JODI’s remarkable patience in the face of BERYL’s continued obtuseness.”
But since you like judging people – and grading them – you might take a look at the opinions of the jury of your peers, in the form of the other posters weighing in here. Then take a guess what the general verdict is.
And this is in all probability my last post to this thread, unless you manage to become, if not more intelligent, then at least more interesting. Frankly, your continued obtuseness is either willful, in which case your an attention-seeking ass, or involuntary, in which case you have the intellectual ability of a box of hair. In either case, you’re boring me, and that’s the point at which I generally bow out.
Toodles.
Neither. I’m not a lawyer and I don’t think like one. I see it as a question of sets, one set being an exact subset of the other. Clearly the intent of the law is not to start with one large set and begin paring it down for a series of retrials until we find the largest set we can get a conviction with. It would make great strategy if it were allowable – so I read the fact that it is not done as proof it isn’t allowed. That’s all… it’s a logic question to my eyes, and if my end answer is incorrect, than we can conclude the law does not follow logic.
I admit the ‘5th grade’ comment may have been premature, but I’ll resubmit it at this time based on your latest ramblings. This thread is about you and your inability to answer direct questions or communicate coherently. Once again, if you want to accuse me of lying or make personal insults, by all means, open another thread.
Well, Isabel has knocked the Bricker household offline - the “line” in this case being both high speed cable and electricity, so, with the exception for a few moments over the weekend in which I snuck into work, I haven’t had much online time. And when I was at work yesterday, the boards were acting up - curse the timing.
I see I missed a milum-style meltdown above.
I have made an effort to sort through Beryl’s post in effort to see if, by sheerest coincidence, some point requiring a response might have been made.
Beryl’s last argument seems to hinge on the word ‘he’ appearing in one of my hypothetical crimes but not the other, which Beryl concludes creates an element in each that does not appear in the other, making them different offenses for the purposes of double jeopardy analysis.
Setting aside the obvious inference that this was a scrivener’s error, Jodi correctly pointed out that the masculine gender includes the feminine in statutes, and that a female charged with either mopery or dopery could not escape prosecution by pointing to the word ‘he’ and arguing that the law exlcuded females.
The complaint about my comment about extraordinary writs is equally misplaced. Again as many people pointed out in my absence, my comment was directed to the specific situation at hand, and specifically in repy to Beryl’s assertion that a “Writ of Mandate” would lie. Obviously, there are plenty of cases in which extraordinary writs may come into play earlier in the judicial process – but in my hypothetical, a criminal conviction must be had, all direct appeals exhausted, and the PCR process exhausted before a writ may be considered.
My purpose in starting this thread was to expose Beryl_Mooncalf as a fraud and ensure that persons otherwise inclined to accept at face value at comments about the law he (or she) might make were warned. Frankly, I can’t remember ever starting a thread that has served its purpose so well.
- Rick
Having tossed those harsh words at Beryl, and now having read the thread in its entirety, it would be uncouth of me not to acknowledge the good wishes offered by Beryl regarding safety and security from the hurricane’s wrath. I do appreciate that, and thank you for your concern.
- Rick
Glad to hear all is well in Brickerland, at least not as bad as it could be.
And thank you Beryl Mooncalf for making us laugh at you…again.
Note to self: Do not disagree with Bricker on legal issues. Well, duh!
Y’know, it’s great that we have a certain number of posters on the boards who, when they post something, you are guaranteed that it won’t be stupidly wrong. I have a little list. Some of you all are on that list. Others are not. Yes, I’m talking about you, you and ESPECIALLY you.
Holy shit, dude!
whoops.
It’s Deja mmMMMoooo time again.
We agree finally, ESCAPE is a necessary consideration for any client of yours.
Bricker, you’re feeding usDeja mmMooooo. Ipsi dixit, covered in a steaming fog of huffing and puffing by the honorable meadow Muffin of nebulochaotic logic. Admit it, you ate a 2 letter word, a word you typed, defeat you. Deny it and you’re just deja moo’n us bricker, and it smells mighty like exactly like I would expect Deja mmMooooo to smell like. (I knew you were back before the page fully opened)
[quote]
dopery whenhe creeps in a furtive manner
[quote]
It was your parapraxis, bricker, plus a dose of atelophobia, maybe that causes the denial with “it don’t matter the law sees blabble blllabbblle little boys equal little girls blabla” Deja mmmMoooo= this bullshit is familiar, I’ve seen it all before!
Blame (A) your digit of destruction at the end of your arm, (b)your lack of reading skills I gotta “yank the mask off the old moo ranger, …or. moo data will eschew from him”. Da da dum… (thanks J.C.)
“Bi-deoppilate” procedures may be beneficial, (anterior and posterior) This might improve respiration too.
IZ da boyz da same?
From xxxxxx xx xx. Words and phrases must be construed according to the context and the approved usage of the language; but technical words and phrases, and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, must be construed according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning.
xxxxxxThe words used in an accusatory pleadingare construed in their usual acceptance in common language, except such words and phrases as are defined by law, which are construed according to their legal meaning.
Examples of specificity…or, WTF, are specific in the real world…
People who live in Nullibiety often think that way.
bricker, “the solicitor of slyness suspiciously selling senseless self-serving solutions stained with self-centered crap.”
Quote, Judi, >>>Wow, you really don’t know jack-shit…
On a first name basis, No I don’t know 'em, but I recognize his siblings when I see then before me, Such as these gems from the deja mMoooster and deja mMoooostress,
Lets compare cow jack-chips here.
Deja mmMmoooooster
”Obviously, there are plenty of cases in which extraordinary writs may come into play earlier in the judicial process”OKAY, they are OK…
[think bricker quick] I just forgot to say so. Really I just forgot your honor, I will remedy it with an ex post facto law then I’ll remedy that with making ex post facto laws constitutional only when they result in conviction. That will work”[good thinking bricker]
The references to a “Writ of Mandate” are equally inapposite (AND they don’t apply) but being inappropriate, they might apply, so….
The hypo I presented says that you’re on trial for the second time after an acquittal. An extraordinary writ doesn’t come into play until (a) you’re convicted; (b) you have exhausted the direct appeals process; © you have exhausted the PCR process in your jurisdiction.
Second time, after an acquittal, or Second time after, an acquittal. Sly spinster, I mean Shyster, either way, when you evoke the I forgot rule, you cover it up. Better yey, get some deja mMoooToo’er to do it again for you.
OKAY, let’s look at your law, never mind the ex post facto application of the new rules, cheats, whatever, error? “ I said in my hippo there is no ex post facto relief available. No writs, no need to count, no need to read, no need to do it anyway but my way, because I know the answer I will change the facts to fit.
My law reads as follows:
A person is guilty of mopery when, from the hours of 10 PM to 6 AM, creeps in a furtive manner on a public street, wearing substantially dark clothing. A person is guilty of dopery when he creeps in a furtive manner on a public street, wearing substantially dark clothing. You are indicted for mopery, tried, and acquitted. You are then [1]re-indicted, based on the same act, for dopery.
Beryl wisely sees,
I see it, it is hidden under “he”. Swift dude, There is the paragraph on writs, right where you said it would be. Sorry, I just missed it. Readers error.
First writs are “inapposite” = (inappropriate), Then all of a sudden writs are not allowed, but I only meant “in toon town”, because I clearly said that in my hypo, under the word “he” , where writs used to be, that he means he or her or harry or Percy the perch pirate., you know, everything. everybody, an orgy of sorts. A Legal Orgy of sorts. Cool.
Bricker, your statements contradicts your transparent façade. First the Writs are inappropriate, and nothing more. Then they are not allowed, then they are valid, Then He isn’t there when you count 2 and 3, then when the “He” is fond, he is a typo. And everyone should know from the toon town law offered by another Deja mMoooooer that this mish mash, as you say, of sexual disorientation and confusion, is the law. Deja Elephant. Deja Mammoth. Deja bricker!
One would think our beloved nomographer could stand without the help of our resident paramnesiac.
The problem with doing it your way is that it wasn’t the best way, So you changed the rules, and you did that again, when you boohooed over the “correctly spelled and placed type”. And we both know the score, oh yes we do.
What your saying is that if someone gets ahead you, which appraently, you’ll do to yourself, you will change the rules, if you fall, it will be ruled part of the plan, and if you screw up, its all about taking the turn over. Not much different than moving the goal post when the balls in the air is it? deja mMoooo.
Okay, JUST one question. SHOW me how you found TWO elements for mopey and THREE for Dopsey. Or visaversa? Seriously, don’t wait for another to show you how, I want to see how you broke it up. Not that I believe a single spec of this deja mMOooo defense, but I want to see how you did the math?
Deja mmMmooostresssss
Citing the 193 amendment … Infringing on the asserted civil privacy right
civil cases involving state action that is asserted to infringe on a person’s constitutional right to privacy
? Or.
“Kicking a case up to the Supreme Court for appeal does not add a second jurisdiction for purposes of considering double jeopardy”,
(double jeopardy- Supreme Court – appeal- `(?)’ “Writ of Kick up” )
“ since the question (jurisdictionally speaking) is whether more than one[sp]jurisidiction will or can bring charges for the same crime or actions,” (jurisdiction? <- -> I think the word was sovereignties?)
“ and the Supreme Court does not bring charges, ever. Well, hardly ever. I suppose it’s theoretically possible for the Supremes to charge someone with something as a court of original [sp]jurisidiction,”
(Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in suits between states, otherwise, they have original jurisdiction in all cases where people are accused of pushing ducks into ponds…)
“but I’m not aware of that ever happening. Certainly that ain’t what we’re talking about here. The only question regarding jurisdiction and the Supreme Court is whether the S.C. has [sp]jurisidiction to hear the appeal. This has nothing to do with multiple jurisdictions for double jeopardy purposes.”
(Double jeopardy and multiple jurisdictions have a link, IF two sovereign power share a common jurisdictional area, and the ability to exercise their authority within that geographical area.– Ever see a robber prosecuted by the feds and a state for robbing a fed chartered institution. /sovereign powers/ with /concurrent jurisdiction/. Suggestion, to those wanting a cite, go rob a federal chartered S & L, then let me know. – no don’t seriously don’t)
(Supreme Court = issue of federal law… State court = hear case with “independent and adequate” state ground, where SC has no jurisdiction.- ) If toon town has its own little jurisdiction inside the jurisdiction of the supreme court, then there are courts with jurisdiction to hear matters in the same geographical area, although there may not ge jurisdiction to hear ALL the possible cases that can be hears in those jurisdictions, Supreme court needs federal question. No federal question, of hearin.
“You not only live in Wrong Kong, you are the mayor, nay, the king”.
Well, there is good news and bad news, which do you want first neighbor?
“and the Supreme Court does not bring charges, ever. Well, hardly ever. I suppose it’s theoretically possible for the Supremes to charge someone with something as a court of original [sp]jurisidiction, but I’m not aware of that ever happening Certainly that ain’t what we’re talking about here.” pant, pant, pant, pant…spin…spin…spin…
See, you’ve mastered the rambling nonsense requirement already, and you’ve only been here a few hours. You’ll get much better soon enough. You may use the king’s computer anytime.{Royal Seal})
And this is in all probability my last post to this thread, unless you manage to become, if not more intelligent, [reading encyclopedia, reading journals, reading everything on internet, looking at pictures, reading bookshelf, doing math, no, reading]then at least more interesting.[studying dead poets, studying more interesting things, looking at pictures, WOW, reading books]
Frankly, your continued obtuseness is either willful, in which case your an attention-seeking ass, or involuntary, in which case you have the intellectual ability of a box of hair.
(Subject, you must bow when you leave the kings presence)
In either case, you’re boring me, and that’s the point at which I generally bow out. (great bow, you’re excused wait, my prize…
I think I might choose the box of hair, that is, if it isn’t blonde ?
I don’t want it if it’s blond, ok,
Also, is it carpet or drapes?
I don’t want it if it’s carpet, only drapes,
Unless they match???
Then carpet and drapes, please, not blonde, though…
otherwise tell me all about the “ass” offering???
Oh, Mr…
I was considering taking your advice regarding claiming agave…I’m just curious though, If I claimed agave would I be claiming (a)The “spiny-leafed plant” (b) or the “the mother of Pentheus”? I’ll probably take the spiny-leafed plant, though, that mother doesn’t sound like much fun. Thanks.
“Y’know, it’s great that we have a certain number of posters on the boards who, when they post something, you are guaranteed that it won’t be stupidly wrong”.
Wrong is certainly better than stupidly wrong, always choose wrong over stupidly wrong in these circumstances BTW, how is your new a phoneless cord working?
OK, folks!
Let’s have a pool!
How many pages is this trainwreck/meltdown/pile-on going to go?
I dibs 6!
p.s. - when everybody tells you you’re drunk, lie down - always good advice.