# Questions about sky marshalls

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 21, 2014, 12:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019 "2014-10-21T12:52:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2014, 12:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/41 "2014-10-22T00:22:22Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Do you have a cite in English for this?

My translate plugin for that page says:  
_In Switzerland the running time of the first national specialty course for the training of professional Sky Marshals. So far, the Canton Police Corps have developed their own flying policemen. The new training location by the federal government is secret - but not the order of Marshals: You should turn off terrorists on the plane - by all means._

> [@exile3D](#):
>
> nitpick: i heard that they use guns that can not acutally hurt the planes hull…no idea how this works but they mentioned that in a documentary

air guns, obviously

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dasilva94](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5ac83/32.png) [@dasilva94](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dasilva94)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2014, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/42 "2014-10-22T01:17:53Z")

</div>

> [@Bullitt](#):
>
> Special bullets maybe?

Love your name relevant the question 🙂

The most likely Bullet that would be used would by the Sky Marshal would be the Glaser Safety Slug [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaser\_Safety\_Slug](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaser_Safety_Slug)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2014, 10:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/43 "2014-10-22T10:21:27Z")

</div>

> [@dstarfire](#):
>
> Finally, some less-lethal rounds (bean-bags, frangible bullets, etc) would be virtually harmless to an aircraft hull.

Bullet holes are virtually harmless to an aircraft hull. Aircraft are designed to be safe with holes or cracks up the size where they are _easily seen by inspection_. If it’s small enough so that you might night notice it, it’s not dangerous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2014, 10:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/44 "2014-10-22T10:25:18Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> (2) Yes. Aircraft aren’t as sensitive to bullets as the media claims.

Are there media claims like that? I haven’t seen them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2014, 11:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/45 "2014-10-22T11:26:46Z")

</div>

> [@Bullitt](#):
>
> Special bullets maybe?

That’s usually the case. The [Glaser Safety Slug](http://www.corbon.com/safety-slug/general/glaser-safety-slug) was designed for this very reason.

ETA: Aarrgh. Ninjaed by DaSilva.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reverend\_Meade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Reverend\_Meade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reverend_Meade)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2014, 2:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/46 "2014-10-22T14:52:47Z")

</div>

> [@Ranger\_Jeff](#):
>
> That, sir, is an insult to every man and woman in the United States Coast Guard. :mad:

You are completely right. I keep forgetting they were moved over there. The Coast Guard is arguably the most effective organization in the U.S. government and does not deserve to be so slighted. My sincerest apologies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2014, 1:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/47 "2014-10-24T13:41:19Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Nitpick: since 1974, they’ve been called [Air Marshals](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Air_Marshal_Service), not Sky Marshals.

Which was a stupid change. An air marshal is a flag-rank officer in an air force. A sky marshal is a cop on a plane.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2014, 1:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/48 "2014-10-24T13:57:47Z")

</div>

I had never heard the term until people starting asking questions about them post-9/11. Made me think of the blue guy from [The Centurions](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Centurions_(TV_series)) for some reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2014, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/49 "2014-10-24T14:10:47Z")

</div>

Keep in mind the skin of an airliner is not armoured, it’s as thin as they can get away with.

As mentioned above, the ammunition would likely not be rhino-stopping massive ordinance Dirty harry uses. The point is not that a gun won’t go through the skin of the aircraft, although if it hits flesh first, likely it slows down enough that it won’t. The point is that a bullet will put a bullet-sized hole in the aluminum skin, and 10psi difference and a half-inch hole does not lead to massive fuselage skin failure, a decompression passenger-ejecting windstorm as first made popular in _Goldfinger_, etc. - it means the compressor works overtime, possibly can’t keep up and there’s slow loss of pressure and the oxygen masks pop down.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StrangerThanFiction](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f05b48/32.png) [@StrangerThanFiction](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/StrangerThanFiction)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2014, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/50 "2014-10-24T14:56:24Z")

</div>

As mentioned up thread, a bullet hole wouldn’t even depressurize an airplane. Air is constantly being pumped into the fuselage, and there is an opening with an automatically actuated door called an outflow valve that lets enough air out to maintain the desired cabin pressure.

Here is a photo of the outflow valve on a Boeing 737: [http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Outflow.jpg](http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Outflow.jpg)

For size reference, the aft cabin door sill can be seen at the top of the image. Obviously, a bullet hole somewhere in the pressure vessel could be easily compensated for by closing the outflow valve a smidge. Larger airplanes have more air coming in, larger outflow valves, and often more outflow valves. Any hole in the pressure vessel is smaller relative to the entire system. The outflow valves on a 747 are each about the size of a cabin window. Now I don’t know that pressurization could be completely maintained after the loss of a cabin window at altitude, but it wouldn’t be the end-of-the-world scenario that Hollywood might have you believe (assuming no other structural damage).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bullitt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bullitt/32/5725_2.png) [@Bullitt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bullitt)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2014, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019/51 "2014-10-24T15:39:08Z")

</div>

Glaser Safety Slugs - interesting.

Wikipedia:

> [@](#):
>
> The United States Federal Air Marshal Service tested and used the Glaser Safety Slug extensively in the 1970s and 80s on board commercial passenger aircraft to defend against hijackers. Air Marshals are now issued SIG Sauer P229 pistols with a 12-round capacity firing conventional-jacketed hollow point ammunition in .357 SIG caliber.

Here’s a video showing tests fired on combinations of dry wall, water (in a 1-gal plastic milk jug), ballistics gel, and denim on a pork shoulder. What’s interesting is the visible spread pattern of the birdshot in the ballistics gel.  
**Glaser Safety Slug 9mm Gel Test; 5:24 video** : [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hFxG6Hpy3A4](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hFxG6Hpy3A4)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/questions-about-sky-marshalls/702019.md?page=2)
