Since said gland was biological, just be glad said sound wasn’t flatulent. Just think, Parker might have had to stock up on bean burritos to get the necessary pressure to … er, excrete out to such distances.
Spidey’s mechancial webshooters have gone “thwip” since 1964.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread hijack.
Hmmm, yes, you have all been very helpful, and this has been quite thought provoking on what I’m gonna do in my story now. At the moment, undecided, but you guys have been very helpful.
Thank you.
And I guess I could thank you for welcoming me as well. So I will: Thanks.
Psychopachik Vampire
What’s really awful is when the good guy points a gun at the bad guy and says “stop” and the bad guy says “you won’t shoot me” and the good guy cocks the gun. I guess the idea is to show the bad guy that you’re really serious about shooting him, but wtf are you doing pointing an uncocked guy at someone in the first place?
As for lasers being visible, there was a cartoon show called “Gargoyles” in which they explained this: the laserbeams themselves were far above the visible spectrum, but visible light was added as a tracer beam. I think it was meant as a subtle dig at all the shows which feature laser fights with beams crisscrossing the screen.
I figure that if we ever do get laser guns, they’d artificially include a noise just so you know that the gun was fired. And probably they’d make it a funky zappy noise just for geekiness’s sake.
But, you can see a muzzle flash and hear a gunshot and thus we know a gun was fired. Imagine a movie gunfight scene where the guns didn’t make noise and had no muzzle flash. That is the kind of scene that was earlier described as being boring.
Now THAT was a nitpick. Even in atmosphere, you can’t really see a laser beam much. And it was pretty obvious what I meant - besides, lingually the word laser refers to either the beam or the device.
And really wierd - and not the kind of wierd that people like. All these fighters standing around acting out the image of shooting each toehr with weaponry, which has no noticable effect until one of them dies. Freaky. And not very good cinematography.
Optical sights with superimposed red dots are old school technolgy now. You look through the sight with both eyes open and shoot where you see the dot. Unlike a laser sight it doesn’t project so you won’t give your position away.
Hey, I remember Gargoyles too. The explanation actually was that the fancy weapons were microwave guns, but the laser was added for targetting. I was impressed that the writers even bothered to add the scientific spin. I also liked the explanation for how man-sized creatures could have the energy to glide, as well as fight and talk and other stuff.
The star trek “phaser” means “phase modulated laser” which is a typical star trek type of name. Emphasis is placed on how cool the name sounds rather than what it really means and whether or not the name actually makes sense (like sonic shower). But a phaser really is a laser, or at least it was originally. Star trek also isn’t consistant with its own technology, so they may have fuddled the definition of “phaser” over the years.
Of course nitrogen can be ionized (its ionization energy is only twice that of iron’s). The problem is getting that energy into the molecule. Nitrogen is very nearly transparent to visible light; that’s the 0.02 dB/km attenuation. Since the vast majority of the laser’s energy passes straight through the air, you need a really powerful laser to dump enough energy into the air to ionize it.
REMPI-LIF study you cited supports this (if I read it correctly). The are looking at NO spefically because for N[sub]2[/sub] “the ionization step is rather inefficient”. (Please see the REMPI-LIF study for the complete context.)
I should point a possible flaw in my calculation: I assume all the processes are linear. At the very high energies I ended up with, I expect that non-linear effects may become important.
I also assume that the laser is not tuned to any of the transitions of N[sub]2[/sub].
I don’t believe there was ever an official explanation of what “phaser” meant: in other words, I am pretty sure you definition is a fanboy thing, since I have heard several variations, with no source. Regardless, the only logical thing including the words “phase” and “laser” is Phase Coherent, and lasers already are.
Which is still pointless, since Star Trek weapons display no property of a laser.
Star trek weapons seem to simply stop when they hit refined metal (sometimes failing to damage the beige upholstery when set on kill), can heat rocks with a “wide beam” and kill people, making them dissapear, without actually vaporizing them. There is no scientific explanation for these phenomena. Its not possible with what we know of science. Perhaps that will change someday, but I can positively assert to you that the phaser is not a laser device.
Emphasis is also placed on “coolness” of the technology, not practiality. Sonic shower? Something wrong with “water”?
Of course, my favorite sci-fi weapon has to be the “pulse” rifles and “smart” guns of Aliens. “Pulses” of what? 10mm HE, your standard armor piercing round? Random high pitched noises and muzzle flashes? Yeah and those “smart” guns seem like real precision weapons. Plus all the accessories - grenade launcher, flame thrower (always appropriate for claustrophobic spaces like spaceships and mining colonies), motion tracker, silencer, LOUDENER, flash ENHANCER, voice activation (LETS ROCK!!!).