[QUOTE=Pullet]
IIRC, it would be strange to see a raccoon walking around blatantly in daylight. A professor here teaches us that such behavior from a skunk would be enough to worry about rabies. However, it’s possible that this particular raccoon was just very habituated to people.
Mayhap CannyDan will wander back in.
[/QUOTE]
Sure.
Rabies manifests itself in wildlife with a variety of symptoms, ranging from the classic foaming at the mouth aggressiveness (“furious rabies”) to the polar opposite. The later is termed “dumb rabies”. The animal may appear calm, submissive, tractable, as if it was a “tame” individual. That individual may flip from one behavior to the other instantly and without warning.
A raccoon or any other wild animal wandering the streets at an unlikely time is always suspect. It may be an individual habituated to human presence, or it may be displaying an aberant behavior caused by some underlying injury (e.g., hit by car) or disease (rabies, distemper, or others that attack the central nervous system). Exercise caution and call your local animal control agency. They are in the best position to judge since they will be familiar with the current incidence of rabies in the area.
If one works closely with wild mammals, one must be ever vigilant. Rabies can of course be transmitted by a bite or scratch. It can also, though with much lower probability, be transmitted by aerosolized saliva, such as from a cough or sneeze. It may, though again with low probability, be transmitted by direct contact with any bodily fluid such as blood, urine or feces. It may even be transmitted by contact with the animal’s fur, if saliva is present. If camping where rabies is common (especially in the third world) a rabid animal might inspect you and lick your face while you slept in a sleeping bag.
All these (except the direct bite or scratch) are considered to be “casual exposures”. The pre-exposure rabies vaccine used today for humans is considered to provide sufficient protection from casual exposures. But in the event of an actual bite or other direct exposure, the victim must undergo the post-exposure rabies injection series. There’s a pretty good description of this series and some other rabies issues in another current thread called “Pet Wolves”-- but I seem to be too stupid right now to remember how to link to it.
The pre-exposure vaccination series for humans typically comprises three injections spaced some days apart, each consisting of either 1.0cc of vaccine injected subcutaneously or 0.1cc vaccine injected intradermally. Our cost for this series is usually about $60 per injection.
The pre-exposure vaccination in humans challenges the immune system which will create some antibodies. This level (“blood titre”) is measurable, and as stated above will help to decide if a booster shot is required periodically. When challenged, the immune system first designs a “template” of the antibody. (highly simplified version of immunology) It then makes some but not necessarily much of the actual antibody. In rabies, the virus is pretty selective in its choice of tissue to attack, concentrating first in the central nervous system. It may actually remain “unnoticed” by the body’s immune response system, even if some antibodies are present. If the infection proceeds rapidly enough, it may be able to stay ahead and overwhelm the body’s ability to manufacture sufficient new antibodies from the existing template. In which case, you could still die even if you had the pre-exposure vaccination.
So in case of a significant exposure, as from a bite, the post-exposure series is required whether or not the victim has had pre-exposure innoculation. This is no longer the nasty series of stomach injections. Instead it is a series of (a) some amounts of vaccine, intended to challenge the immune system (which again may or may not have “noticed” the virus from the bite) and produce de novo antibodies, plus (b) massive doses of human rabies immune globulin, intended to “soak up” such virus as is present. Cost for this series is commonly in the $2,000 range. And, while not as nasty as the old stomach shots, it isn’t particularly pleasant.
Bats are always a judgement call, for the reasons stated upthread. It does appear possible to transmit the disease from a bat to a human without an actual bite, presumably by aerosolized saliva and/or urine. Certainly in any wild population of bats, only a low percentage of individuals actually have the disease. One bat found in the house makes transmission rather unlikely. However, as also stated upthread, rabies is pretty much 100% fatal (there are incredibly rare exceptions) once symptoms develop. So when it comes to bats, this is a classic “Are you feeling lucky today?” scenario.
The only reliable way to avoid this nasty scenario is to have the animal examined to either confirm or rule out the possibility of rabies. Of course, this requires that the animal be available, and not have run off into the woods after biting you.
NajaNivea my dear, please accept my apology for the unwarranted assumtion about your gender. (You must admit though that neither skinning foxes nor falconry is practiced by as many women as men.) I hope you get your golden eagle. We don’t have them around here; we only have bald eagles. I’ve got 5 of them here right now. Please do be careful with the foxes. And if you are bitten, refrigerate the carcass (do not freeze) and bring it immediately to your local health department for rabies testing.