# Racist all white Vanity Fair Cover?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 5, 2010, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820 "2010-02-05T18:22:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/21 "2010-02-05T20:03:15Z")

</div>

I agree with **Broomstick** : unconscious bias. I’m reluctant to call it “racism” which does imply malice, but I am surprised that the editors didn’t think to add an actress of color if only to avoid this kind of controversey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![2ply](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/2/b2d939/32.png) [@2ply](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/2ply)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/22 "2010-02-05T20:16:26Z")

</div>

The age cutoff for the peice was 30. Zoe Saldana is 31, so she’s too old by Hollywood standards.

I think omitting 26 year old Gabourey Sidibe had way more to do with her being overweight than black. I mean, she is up for an Oscar this year, so she’s more up and coming than any of the women in that photo. But her size is probably going to limit her future career in a way her skin won’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Deeg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deeg/32/2955_2.png) [@Deeg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Deeg)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/23 "2010-02-05T20:17:21Z")

</div>

Evan Rachel Wood is “up and coming”? She’s been [staring in movies](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0296845/) for almost 10 years.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mil0](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ac8455/32.png) [@mil0](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mil0)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/24 "2010-02-05T20:24:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> surely [Oscar nominee Gabourey] Sidibe, Zoe Saldana of ‘Avatar’ and ‘Star Trek,’ and Freida Pinto of ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ are having their moment.

These proposed additions may not have even been plausible. The female actors listed all have another few things in common. They’re all under 30, and have been in on average, ten films.

Gabourey Sidibe only has one movie under her belt. Also, in what reality does the author of this piece reside that putting **her** on a magazine that has a target demographic of underweight, fashion obsessed, celebrity crazed white girls would be considered a good idea?

Freida Pinto, only has one movie.

Zoe Saldana would have been a good addition to the cover, as she seems to fit all the criteria except that she’s 31. The oldest other actress pictured is 27, with the others falling mostly around 24. And who knows, maybe she was offered, but declined.

Can anyone think of some other fresh faces of non-white Hollywood? Maybe Charlyne Yi? I can’t really think of any others off the top of my head.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Death\_of\_Rats](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a6a055/32.png) [@Death\_of\_Rats](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Death_of_Rats)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/25 "2010-02-05T20:27:39Z")

</div>

> [@Raygun99](#):
>
> But you know Mia Wasikowska, Rebecca Hall and Abbie Cornish? Really? From what?

Mia Wasikowska - _Alice in Wonderland_  
Rebecca Hall - _The Prestige, Vicky Cristina Barcelona, Frost/Nixon_  
Abbie Cornish -\* Stop-loss, Elizabeth: the golden age\*

I don’t think you can accurately say these girls deserved to be there any _less_ then Zoe Saldana.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Death\_of\_Rats](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a6a055/32.png) [@Death\_of\_Rats](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Death_of_Rats)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/26 "2010-02-05T20:32:54Z")

</div>

The biggest hit to Gabourey Sidibe is that she has had one good performance in one movie. Not enough of a track record yet to call her an “up and coming” star. She has the acting chops, so if she can get a few more roles under her belt I think she would be a good choice for a future list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Khaki\_Campbell](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9de053/32.png) [@Khaki\_Campbell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Khaki_Campbell)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/27 "2010-02-05T20:34:13Z")

</div>

> [@Anaamika](#):
>
> As **a woman of color** , I will say it would have been _nice_ to have a non-white woman on the cover. Is that really so much to ask? That not every role model presented to us be lily-white and so conforming to the standards of beauty?

Because, of course, white is not a “color” :rolleyes:.

Diversity ? There’s plenty of (beautiful) diversity on that cover. Brunettes, redheads, blondes, hazel-haired.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raygun99](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6f9a4e/32.png) [@Raygun99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Raygun99)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/28 "2010-02-05T20:41:55Z")

</div>

> [@Death\_of\_Rats](#):
>
> Mia Wasikowska - _Alice in Wonderland_  
> Rebecca Hall - _The Prestige, Vicky Cristina Barcelona, Frost/Nixon_  
> Abbie Cornish -\* Stop-loss, Elizabeth: the golden age\*
> 
> I don’t think you can accurately say these girls deserved to be there any _less_ then Zoe Saldana.

So:  
For Mia, a film that hasn’t come out yet, for Rebecca, two bit roles and a decent supporting one, and for Abbie Cornish, two minor roles in bombs. Zoe Saldana: a major role in Star Trek and the female lead in _the highest grossing film in history_. I’ll grant the 31 years old thing, but people can’t be serious when they say she wouldn’t be more worthy of inclusion but for that.

I wouldn’t accuse Vanity Fair of racism, but they’re certainly unimaginative.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eonwe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eonwe/32/240_2.png) [@Eonwe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eonwe)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/29 "2010-02-05T21:05:17Z")

</div>

> [@Khaki\_Campbell](#):
>
> Because, of course, white is not a “color” :rolleyes:.
> 
> Diversity ? There’s plenty of (beautiful) diversity on that cover. Brunettes, redheads, blondes, hazel-haired.

Come now, really?

Are you suggesting that there is no difference culturally between the fact that my roommate and I have slightly different colored hair, and the fact that I can (rightly or wrongly) identify the culture and geographic regional differences between Anaamika and I just on sight?

Sure, white is a color. It’s also the color of power and dominance in America and Europe. What is your point?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sailboat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sailboat/32/461_2.png) [@Sailboat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sailboat)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 9:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/30 "2010-02-05T21:11:43Z")

</div>

> [@Raygun99](#):
>
> So:  
> For Mia, a film that hasn’t come out yet, for Rebecca, two bit roles and a decent supporting one, and for Abbie Cornish, two minor roles in bombs. Zoe Saldana: a major role in Star Trek and the female lead in _the highest grossing film in history_

Maybe they’re stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gangster\_Octopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a8b319/32.png) [@Gangster\_Octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gangster_Octopus)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/31 "2010-02-05T21:52:22Z")

</div>

What about Aemrica Fererra?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freudian\_Slit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@Freudian\_Slit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freudian_Slit)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/32 "2010-02-05T22:14:16Z")

</div>

> [@Khaki\_Campbell](#):
>
> Because, of course, white is not a “color” :rolleyes:.
> 
> Diversity ? There’s plenty of (beautiful) diversity on that cover. Brunettes, redheads, blondes, hazel-haired.

As **Eonwe** has pointed out, it’s not really the same thing. I note the same thing comes up when people talk about getting plastic surgery to fit in with the mainstream (read: white) culture, and people get all huffy and reply that white people tan themselves now so doesn’t that mean something? I guess it’s different because it’s not like there’s a long history in our culture of black people setting the trend of what is attractive or acceptable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Fight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90ced4/32.png) [@Cat\_Fight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Fight)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/33 "2010-02-05T22:30:01Z")

</div>

> [@Broomstick](#):
>
> I could see it as unconscious bias. That is, it’s racism without malice, but racism nonetheless.

It’s a magazine cover. Nothing’s unconscious. Even when[Zoe Saldana was on the cover](http://thebosh.com/upload/2008/02/04/vanity_fair_magazine_hollywood_issue_march_2008/vanityfairx-large.jpg)a while back she was after the fold and the only girl darker than mocha, as well as the woman wearing the least amount of clothing.

Are there racists on staff? Probably. Did someone suggest someone ‘colorful’ and get a stern look or a ‘We’re not sure we want to go in that… direction’? Maybe. Are they factoring in actual sales of past covers or real demands from advertisers when they make decisions like this? Probably (as is often the case with this, everyone’s likely so terrified of messing up they’d rather feature Gwyneth Paltrow again than anyone ‘different,’ even if they have to cite a single cover from six years back of a B-list star of mixed ethnic heritage that sold badly in a an economic slump).

Beyond just being a bunch of pasty, pretty, forgettable girls (nothing against the individual actresses themselves – they can’t control what they look like, for the most part, or how they’re photoshopped), the cover is Boring with a capital B. And it has been done by Vanity Fair countless times, I’m glad they’re finally getting called out on it. Enough with the same boring faces. If they don’t want to go under, they’re going to have to up the ante – and that includes (gasp) acknowledging that their readers both are and aspire to be more than pale white socialites. A Hamptons mixer has more color than that cover.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freudian\_Slit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@Freudian\_Slit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freudian_Slit)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/34 "2010-02-05T22:34:12Z")

</div>

But would it have been less boring if everything else was the same except the skin color of the actresses? Is it the poses and the clothing or is it just the whiteness?

Also, I can see why from a sales point of view, they’d only put one black girl on the cover and put her after the fold–but why put her in the least amount of clothing? It does into into the stereotype of black=oversexed, but do people really respond to that? If we’re looking at the same people who would rather not even see a black person on a cover, are they also thinking that if they do have to see one they’d rather see one dressed more provocatively?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/35 "2010-02-05T22:40:02Z")

</div>

> [@Cat\_Fight](#):
>
> It’s a magazine cover. Nothing’s unconscious. Even when[Zoe Saldana was on the cover](http://thebosh.com/upload/2008/02/04/vanity_fair_magazine_hollywood_issue_march_2008/vanityfairx-large.jpg)a while back she was after the fold and the only girl darker than mocha, as well as the woman wearing the least amount of clothing.

The woman at the back with the hat is wearing pretty well exactly the same outfit as her. Except, of course, for the hat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mean_mr.mustard/32/3865_2.png) [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mean_Mr.Mustard)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/36 "2010-02-05T22:49:10Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> but i would guess that Oprah has been on it at some point in time.

How many non-blacks have been on the cover of Oprah’s magazine.

For that matter, how many non-Oprah folks? 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Fight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90ced4/32.png) [@Cat\_Fight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Fight)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/37 "2010-02-05T22:51:40Z")

</div>

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> But would it have been less boring if everything else was the same except the skin color of the actresses? Is it the poses and the clothing or is it just the whiteness?

It’s a bit of everything. The runway model sameness of the girls themselves (which I think is rampant in the industry – if you replace cover models with actresses and aren’t particularly creative, then actresses need to start looking like models – skinny and white), but also in the context of other, very similar covers. It’s hard to get excited about a new crop of ‘fresh’ faces when they look so unremarkable grouped together. Perhaps Hollywood’s fault (an argument I’ve already read), but at this point _Vanity Fair_ can lead as much as follow celebrity trends. If they blame Hollywood, then they’re ceding power and pretty much writing themselves off. ‘We’d love to feature non-white actresses, but there aren’t any!’ only works if you lack foresight or any sort of creative edge. I’d sooner take that argument from a magazine like People – and they are actually pretty good when it comes to featuring non-white celebrities.

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> Also, I can see why from a sales point of view, they’d only put one black girl on the cover and put her after the fold–but why put her in the least amount of clothing? It does into into the stereotype of black=oversexed, but do people really respond to that? If we’re looking at the same people who would rather not even see a black person on a cover, are they also thinking that if they do have to see one they’d rather see one dressed more provocatively?

Oversexualizing black people is pretty par for the course in fashion spreads and magazines like VF and Vogue. Pretty surprising that she’s not in a leopard print bikini, actually. I’m also not convinced that putting her next to Anne Hathaway and Jessica Biel would have caused the issue to tank (though honestly I have no idea what its sales were like, anyway).

When publishers talk about how covers with black faces don’t sell well, they almost always mean black models. Or, as I mentioned before, they cite some January cover with a black actress from five years ago that didn’t do well as proof that America won’t buy them, ever (while poor sales of [Nicole Kidman and Drew Barrymore](http://horiwood.com/2009/04/11/angelina-jolie-reigns-as-queen-of-magazine-cover-girls/) covers hardly take them out of the running).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Fight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90ced4/32.png) [@Cat\_Fight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Fight)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/38 "2010-02-05T22:54:28Z")

</div>

I think it was the infamous [Tom Ford issue](http://dailycontributor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/vanity-fair-april-2009-2.jpg) that had several black celebrities, and only the black celebrities, stark naked in their profiles. IIRC there were also some naked white women’s (or girls’) limbs, but they made appearances in profile photos for male musicians and actors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/39 "2010-02-05T22:57:21Z")

</div>

Thank God! We are reduced to quibbling about whether the cover of a fashion magazine is racist because it has no people of color on it.

Racism must be well and truly dead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Fight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90ced4/32.png) [@Cat\_Fight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Fight)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 12:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820/40 "2010-02-06T00:03:28Z")

</div>

> [@Contrapuntal](#):
>
> Thank God! We are reduced to quibbling about whether the cover of a fashion magazine is racist because it has no people of color on it.
> 
> Racism must be well and truly dead.

Free at last! Free at last!

Honestly, I did not know GD (or debate in general) could only be of the life-or-death variety. I don’t know what people have been complaining about, recently – hel-lo, the slaves were freed, guys! And everyone knows magazines, TV, children’s books, billboards, commercials, videogames, movies and websites are something mature, educated adults tune into briefly and objectively after they’ve spent their day in reality. If they affect anyone’s perspective or self-esteem, alone or together, it’s only because that person is too dumb to not be manipulated!

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/racist-all-white-vanity-fair-cover/527820.md?page=3)
